Save

Dogs of War or Jackals of Terror? Foreign Fighters and Mercenaries in International Law

In: International Community Law Review
Author:
Simon Chesterman National University of Singapore chesterman@nus.edu.sg

Search for other papers by Simon Chesterman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

The threat of “blowback” from foreign fighters, unaffiliated volunteers who join an insurgency in a distant land, has led states to explore a variety of normative mechanisms. Among these is the international legal regime applicable to mercenaries. This short paper considers the evolution of mercenarism and the efforts to regulate it. Attempts to fit foreign fighters into that normative category are unlikely to succeed. In part this is due to the question of motivation, which is central to most definitions of mercenary and focuses on private gain. But it is also linked to the reasons for regulation in the first place: mercenaries are seen as threats in the states to which they travel, while foreign fighters are primarily deemed threats by the states to which they might return.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 890 210 69
Full Text Views 422 7 0
PDF Views & Downloads 424 20 0