Save

The Requisite Rigour in the Identification of Customary International Law

A Look at the Reports of the Special Rapporteur of the International Law Commission

In: International Community Law Review
Author:
Noora Arajärvi The Berlin Potsdam Research Group “The International Rule of Law – Rise or Decline?” Noora.Arajarvi@eui.eu

Search for other papers by Noora Arajärvi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Over the last few decades, the methodology for the identification of customary international law (cil) has been changing. Both elements of cil – practice and opinio juris – have assumed novel and broader forms, as noted in the Reports of the Special Rapporteur of the International Law Commission (2013, 2014, 2015, 2016). This contribution discusses these Reports and the draft conclusions, and reaction by States in the Sixth Committee of the United Nations General Assembly (unga), highlighting the areas of consensus and contestation. This ties to the analysis of the main doctrinal positions, with special attention being given to the two elements of cil, and the role of the unga resolutions. The underlying motivation is to assess the real or perceived crisis of cil, and the author develops the broader argument maintaining that in order to retain unity within international law, the internal limits of cil must be carefully asserted.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 316 101 7
Full Text Views 577 28 3
PDF Views & Downloads 406 47 7