Unveiling Christ in the Islamicate World: Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī’s Prophetology as a Model for Christian Apologetics in Gregory Bar ʿEbrōyō’s Treatise on the Incarnation

in Intellectual History of the Islamicate World
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

When looking for original lines of Christian apologetics in response to Islam from later periods, a unique vantage point is offered by the bilingual authors of the ‘Syriac Renaissance’, such as the West Syrian (‘Jacobite’) scholarly bishop of the thirteenth century, Gregory Bar ʿEbrōyō. This contribution builds upon previous scholarship on the latter author’s borrowings from Muslim sources in composing his own writings, and in particular on his use of Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī’s theological compendium Muḥaṣṣal afkār al-mutaqaddimīn wa-l-mutaʾakhkhirīn, in his principal work on Christian theology, the Lamp of the Sanctuary (Mnōrat qudšē). It is argued that Bar ʿEbrōyō’s reliance on Rāzī’s proofs of prophecy in the treatise on the Incarnation goes much further than hitherto assumed, as the Muslim theologian’s prophetology served as the model for his Christian apologetic defense of the doctrine of the Incarnation.

Sections

References

4

Teule, “Barhebraeus,” pp. 604–606, and further references.

19

Roggema, “Ibn Kammūna’s and Ibn al-ʿIbri’s Responses,” p. 205.

22

Ibid., p. 29 (note 12), p. 9.

26

Quoted in Weiss, “Knowledge of the Past,” p. 90. The actual source from which Bar ʿEbrōyō borrowed his discussion of tawātur is unclear.

33

Griffith, “Answering the Call of the Minaret,” p. 116.

40

Cheikho (ed.), “Maǧālis,” p. 116; Delly (tr.), La théologie d’ Élie, p. 84.

46

Khoury, p. 41 (note 25): “Cette allégorie est presque littéralement empruntée à Al-Muḥaṣṣal de Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī”.

49

Khoury, p. 9.

50

Gimaret, La doctrine d’ al-Ashʿari, p. 459.

61

Khoury, p. 9.

63

Khoury, p. 9; 11: “En somme, on se tromperait si l’ on s’ attendait à trouver en Bar Hebraeus un penseur profond ou un vrai novateur. Il est plutôt l’ érudit aux connaissances prodigieusement étendues, qui recueille et ordonne excellemment, mais qui n’ a ni le souci, le loisir, de rien renouveler”.

64

Takahashi, Barhebraeus, pp. 98–99.

65

Thomas, “Christian Borrowings from Islamic Theology,” p. 141.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 13 13 13
Full Text Views 2 2 2
PDF Downloads 0 0 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0