Save

Between Rights, Sovereignty and Cooperation

Responding to Victims of Armed Conflict

In: Journal of International Humanitarian Legal Studies
Author:
Emily Camins PhD Candidate, Faculty of Law, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia, emily.camins@research.uwa.edu.au

Search for other papers by Emily Camins in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

Although the humanitarian effects of armed conflict are vast and transcend national boundaries, international law does not yet provide an adequate or comprehensive response to the suffering of victims of war. This article argues considerations of State sovereignty have shaped the development of international law on post-war redress, hindering the emergence of individual rights to reparations under international humanitarian law. Meanwhile, alternative models such as victim assistance, which largely preserve sovereignty, are emerging in pockets of international humanitarian law, such as weapons treaties. This article suggests that victim assistance offers a potential model for addressing the harm to victims of armed conflict more broadly.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 612 126 17
Full Text Views 269 16 0
PDF Views & Downloads 496 38 1