This paper is a study of the transmission and assimilation of ideas and motifs in different types of Sanskrit literature in ancient India. I examine the classification of both male and female character types in three different Sanskrit literary genres: Jyotiḥśāstra, Āyurveda and Nāṭyaśāstra. The results of the study indicate that the list of male character types offered in the early Jyotiḥśāstra treatise of Garga (Gārgīyajyotiṣa) dating from the beginning of the Common Era contributed in part to the formulations in Āyurveda and formed the basis of the version in the Nāṭyaśāstra. Early āyurvedic treatises expanded the list and organised the male character types according to the Sāṃkhyan guṇa-theory, and the Nāṭyaśāstra further increased the animal similes of Garga, changed the gender emphasis from male to female, and used Kāmaśāstra as the genre for introducting the catalogue of female character types into dramaturgy.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Board of Scholars, trans. (2000). The Nāṭyaśāstra of Bharatamuni. 2nd revised ed. Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications (a division of Indian Book Centre) [Raga Nṛtya Series 2].
Dvivedī, Pārasanātha, ed. (1992–2004). Nāṭyaśāstra of Śrī Bharata Muni, with the commentary Abhinavabhāratī by Śrī Abhinavaguptācārya and Manoramā (Hindi commentary) by Pārasanātha Dvivedī. 4 Vols. Varanasi: Sampurnanand Sanskrit University [Gaṅgānāthajhā-granthamālā 14].
Ghosh, Manomohan, trans. (1951). The Nāṭyaśāstra. A treatise on Hindu Dramaturgy and Histrionics. 2 vols. Calcutta: Asiatic Society of Bengal [Bibliotheca Indica 272].
Kavi, M. Ramakrishna, ed. (1956–1964). Nāṭyaśāstra of Bharata Muni, with the commentary Abhinavabhāratī by Śrī Abhinavaguptācārya. Vols 1 (revised edition by K.S. Ramaswami Sastri)–4. Baroda: Oriental Institute [Gaekwad’s Oriental Series 36, 68, 124, 145].
Krishnamoorthy, K., ed. (1992). Nāṭyaśāstra of Bharatamuni, with the commentary Abhinavabhāratī by Abhinavaguptācārya. Chapters 1–7 Illustrated. Vol. 1. Revised and critically edited. Vadodara: Oriental Institute.
Nagar, R.S., ed. (1988). Nāṭyaśāstra of Bharata Muni, with the commentary Abhinavabhāratī by Śrī Abhinavaguptācārya. 4 Vols. Delhi: Parimal Publications [Parimal Sanskrit Series 4].
Rangacharya, Adya, trans. (1996). The Nāṭyaśāstra. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
Śarmā, Baṭukanātha and Baludeva Upādhyāya, eds. (1929). The Nāṭyaśāstra of Bharata. Banares City: Jai Krishnadās Haridās Gupta, The Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series Office, Vidyā Vilās Press [Kashi-Sanskrit Series 60].
Śāstrī, Bābū Lāla Śukla, ed. (1983). Nāṭyaśāstra of Bharata Muni. 4 Parts. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthan [Kāśī Saṃkṛtagranthamālā 215].
Shastri, Madhusudan, ed. (1971–1981). Nāṭyaśāstra of Bharata Muni, with the commentary Abhinavabhāratī by Śrī Abhinavaguptācārya. 3 Vols. Varanasi: Banaras Hindu University.
Śivadatta, Paṇḍit and Kāśīnāth Pāṇḍurang Parab, eds. (1894). The Nāṭyaśāstra by Śrī Bharatamuni. Bombay: Tukārām Jāvajī proprietor of Javaji Dadaji’s Nirṇaya-sagar Press; revised edition by Paṇḍit Kendārnāth (1943) [Kāvyamālā 42].
Unni, N.P. ed. and trans. (1998). Nāṭyaśāstra. Text with introduction, English translation and indices in four volumes. 4 Vols. Delhi: Nag Publishers.
Trikamjī, Jādavaji, ed. (1941). The Charakasaṃhitā by Agniveśa. Revised by Charaka and Dṛidhabala, with the Āyurveda-Dīpikā Commentary of Cakrapānidatta. Bombay: Satyabhāmābāī Pāṇḍurang for the Nirṇaya Sāgar Press.
Trikamjī, Jādavaji and Nārāyaṇ Rām Āchārya “Kāvyatīrtha”, eds. (1980 [1938]). Suśrutasaṃhitā of Suśruta with the Nibandhasaṅgraha Commentary of Śrī Ḍalhaṇāchārya, and the Nyāyacandrikā Pañjikā of Śrī Gayasāsāchārya on Nidānasthāna. Varanasi/Delhi: Chaukhambha Orientalia [Jaikrishnadas Ayurveda Series 34].
Yatiraja, Yadugiri and K.S. Ramaswami Sastri, eds. (1968 [1930]). Bhārataprakāśana of Śāradātanaya. Baroda: Oriental Institute [GOS 45]. Verses not numbered.
Zysk, Kenneth (2002). Conjugal Love in India. Ratiśāstra and Ratiramaṇa. Text, translation, and notes. Leiden: E.J. Brill [Sir Henry Wellcome Asian Series, Vol. 1].
Zysk, Kenneth (2016). The Indian System of Human Marks. Text, translation, and notes. 2 Vols. Leiden: E.J. Brill [Sir Henry Wellcome Asian Series, Vol. 15].
Bansat-Boudon, Lyne (1990). “The Sāmānyābhinaya or How to Play the Game,” Indologica Taurinensia 15–16: 67–77.
Bansat-Boudon, Lyne (1991). “Les sāttvikālankāra: un theatre de la seduction,” Journal asiatique 279: 199–226.
Duce, Wallace (1963). “The concept of “rasa” in Sanskrit dramatic theory,” Educational Theatre Journal 15.3 (1963): 249–254.
Klaus, Karttunen (2015). Yonas and Yavanas in Indian Literature. Helsinki: Finnish Oriental Society [Studia Orientalia, 116].
Lidova, Natalia (2014). “Natyashastra,” in the online Oxford Bibliographies: http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780195399318/obo-9780195399318-0071.xml.
Tarkekar, G.H. (1975). Studies in the Nāṭyaśāstra. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Tripathi, K.D. [2001 (1988)]. “Lakṣaṇa” in Bettina Bäumer, ed. Pervasive Terms. Vyāpti. Kalātattvakośa. Vol. I. Delhi: Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts and Motilal Banarsidass: 179–191.
Tripathi, K.D. and Narendra Dutt Tiwari, eds. (2015). Nāṭyaśāstra of Bharata Muni. Vol. 1. Chapters I–XIV. Nepal Version. Delhi: Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts [in the Kālamūlaśastra Series]
Vatsyayan, Kapila (1996). Bharata. The Nāṭyaśāstra. New Delhi: Sahiya Akademi.
Zysk, Kenneth (2018). “Greek and Indian Physiognomics.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 138.2: 313–325.
Zysk, Kenneth (forthcoming). “Female character types in ancient Greece and India: Semonides and Nāṭyaśāstra.”
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 551 | 175 | 10 |
Full Text Views | 139 | 4 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 97 | 11 | 0 |
This paper is a study of the transmission and assimilation of ideas and motifs in different types of Sanskrit literature in ancient India. I examine the classification of both male and female character types in three different Sanskrit literary genres: Jyotiḥśāstra, Āyurveda and Nāṭyaśāstra. The results of the study indicate that the list of male character types offered in the early Jyotiḥśāstra treatise of Garga (Gārgīyajyotiṣa) dating from the beginning of the Common Era contributed in part to the formulations in Āyurveda and formed the basis of the version in the Nāṭyaśāstra. Early āyurvedic treatises expanded the list and organised the male character types according to the Sāṃkhyan guṇa-theory, and the Nāṭyaśāstra further increased the animal similes of Garga, changed the gender emphasis from male to female, and used Kāmaśāstra as the genre for introducting the catalogue of female character types into dramaturgy.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 551 | 175 | 10 |
Full Text Views | 139 | 4 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 97 | 11 | 0 |