Somānanda on the Meaningfulness of Language
In: Indo-Iranian JournalSearch for other papers by John Nemec in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
The present article examines Somānanda’s understanding of the denotative capacity of speech (śabda) as presented in his Śivadṛṣṭi, āhnika four. Somānanda argues that this denotative capacity is innate in words because based in a real sāmānya or universal; that a permanent connection links śabda and its object (artha), not convention (saṃketa); and that the referent of speech is an object innately imbued with linguistic capacity in the form of an ever-present, innate sāmānya. Each of these positions is also supported by the Mīmāṃsā, and Somānanda, citing both Śabara and Kumārila, assents to their positions on these points on the understanding that they may only be accepted as philosophically sound if one presumes the existence of a Śaiva non-duality of all as Śiva-as-consciousness. These positions, in turn, are all deployed as arguments against those of the Buddhist Pramāṇa Theorists, whose views in each of these three areas Somānanda contests.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Arnold, Dan. 2006. “On Semantics and Saṃketa: Thoughts on a Neglected Problem with Buddhist Apoha Doctrine.” Journal of Indian Philosophy 34.5: 415–478.
-
Chaturvedi, Radheshyam, Trans. 1986. The Śivadṛṣṭi of Śri Somānanda Nātha. Varanasi: Varanaseya Sanskrit Saṅsthan.
-
Eltschinger, Vincent, John Taber, Michael Torsten Much, and Isabelle Ratié. 2018. Dharmakīrti’s Theory of Exclusion (apoha), Part I: On Concealing, An Annotated Translation of Pramāṇavārttikasvavṛtti 24,16–45,20 (Pramāṇavārttika 1.40–91). Studia Philologica Buddhica 36. Tokyo: The International Institute for Buddhist Studies.
-
Frauwallner, Erich. 1932–1933. “Beiträge zur Apohalehre. I. Dharmakīrti. Übersetzung.” Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes 39: 247–285; 40: 51–94.
-
Frauwallner, Erich. 1935. “Beiträge zur Apohalehre. I. Dharmakīrti. Zusummenfassung.” Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes 42: 93–102.
-
Frauwallner, Erich. 1959. “Dignāga, sein Werk und seine Entwicklung.” Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Süd- und Ostasiens 3: 83–164.
-
Gnoli, Raniero. 1957. “Śivadṛṣṭi by Somānanda: Translation and Commentary, Chapter I.” East and West 8: 16–22.
-
Goudriaan, Teun. 1978. Māyā Divine and Human: A Study of Magic and its Religious Foundations in Sanskrit Texts, with Particular Attention to a fragment of Viṣṇu’s Māyā Preserved in Bali. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
-
Hattori, Masaaki. 2006a. “Introduction.” Special Issue on “Word and Meaning in Indian Philosophy,” Ed. by M. Hattori. Acta Asiatica (Bulletin of the Institute of Eastern Culture) 90: iii–xii.
-
Hattori, Masaaki. 2006b. “The Apoha theory as Referred to in the Nyāyamañjarī.” Special Issue on “Word and Meaning in Indian Philosophy,” Ed. by M. Hattori. Acta Asiatica (Bulletin of the Institute of Eastern Culture) 90: 55–70.
-
Hattori, Masaaki. 2000. “Dignāga’s Theory of Meaning: An Annotated Translation of the Pramāṇasamuccayavṛtti, Chapter V: Anyāpoha-parīkṣā (I).” In Jonathan A. Silk, Ed., Wisdom, Compassion, and the Search for Understanding: The Buddhist Studies Legacy of Gadjin M. Nagao. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
-
Hayes, Richard. 1988. Dignāga on the Interpretation of Signs. Studies of Classical India 9. Dordrecht, Boston, and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
-
Jha, Ganganatha, Trans. 1937, 1939. The Tattvasaṅgraha of Shāntarakṣita, with the Commentary of Kamalashīla, Translated into English. 2 Vols. Gaekwad Oriental Series 80 and 83. Baroda: Oriental Institute.
-
Jha, Ganganatha. 1933. Śābara-Bhāṣya, Translated into English. 3 Vols. Baroda: University of Baroda (Sadhana Press).
-
Jha, Ganganatha. [1900] 1983. Ślokavārttika: Translated from the Original Sanskrit with Extracts from the Commentaries ‘Kasika’ of Sucarita Misra and ‘Nyayaratnakara’ of Partha Sarathi Misra. Sri Garib Das Oriental Series 8. Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications.
-
Kataoka, Kei, Ed. 2008. “A Critical Edition of Bhaṭṭa Jayanta’s Nyāyamañjarī: The Section on Kumārila’s Refutation of the Apoha Theory.” The Memoirs of the Institute of Oriental Culture 154: 1–31.
-
Katsura, Shōryū. 1991. “Dignāga and Dharmakīrti on Apoha.” In E. Steinkellner, Ed., Studies in the Buddhist Epistemological Tradition: Proceedings of the Second International Dharmakīrti Conference. pp. 129–146. Vienna: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften.
-
Kuranishi, Kenichi. 2013. “Yantras in the Buddhist Tantras—Yamāritantras and Related Literature.” In Puṣpikā: Tracing Ancient India Through Texts and Traditions. Vol. 1. Ed. by Nina Mirnig, Péter-Dániel Szántó and Michael Williams. Oxford and Philadelphia: Oxbow Books.
-
McCrea, Lawrence. 2016. “Abhinavagupta as Intellectual Historian of Buddhism.” In Around Abhinavagupta: Aspects of Intellectual History of Kashmir from the Ninth to the Eleventh Century. Leipziger Studien zu Kultur und Geschichte Süd- und Zentralasiens 6. Ed. by Eli Franco and Isabelle Ratié. 263–286. Leipzig: LIT Verlag.
-
McCrea, Lawrence. 2013. “The Transformations of Mīmāṃsā in the Larger Context of Indian Philosophical Discourse.” In Periodization and Historiography of Indian Philosophy, Ed. by Eli Franco. Vienna: Institut für Südasien-, Tibet- und Buddhismuskunde der Universität Wien. 127–144.
-
Muller-Ortega, Paul. 1989. The Triadic Heart of Śiva: Kaula Tantricism of Abhinavagupta in the Non-Dual Shaivism of Kashmir. Albany: State University of New York Press.
-
Nemec, John. forthcoming. The Ubiquitous Śiva (II): Somānanda’s Śivadṛṣṭi and his Śāstric Interlocutors.
-
Nemec, John. 2017. “On the Contributions of the Śivadṛṣṭi of Somānanda to the Intellectual History of the Pratyabhijñā.” Annuaire de l’ École pratique des hautes études (EPHE), Section des sciences religieuses. 124: 15–23.
-
Nemec, John. 2016. “Realism and the Pratyabhijñā: Influences on and Legacies of Somānanda’s Conception of Materiality.” In Around Abhinavagupta: Aspects of Intellectual History of Kashmir from the Ninth to the Eleventh Century. Leipziger Studien zu Kultur und Geschichte Süd- und Zentralasiens 6. Ed. by Eli Franco and Isabelle Ratié. 339–371. Leipzig: LIT Verlag.
-
Nemec, John. 2012. “The Two Pratyabhijñā Theories of Error.” Journal of Indian Philosophy 40.2(2012): 225–257.
-
Pind, Ole Holten. 2009. Dignāga’s Philosophy of Language Dignāga on anyāpoha Pramāṇasamuccaya V: Texts, Translation, and Annotation. D.Phil. Thesis. University of Vienna.
-
Ratié, Isabelle. 2014. Une critique bouddhique du Soi selon la Mīmāṃsā. Présentation, édition critique et traduction de la Mīmāṃsakaparikalpitātmaparīkṣā de Śāntarakṣita (Tattvasaṅgraha 222–284 et Pañjikā). Wien: Verlag der Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften.
-
Taber, John. 2005. A Hindu Critique of Buddhist Epistemology: Kumārila on Perception, The ‘Determination of Perception’ Chapter of Kumārila Bhaṭṭa’s Ślokavārttika. Routledge Hindu Studies Series. London: Routledge.
-
Taber, John. 1992. “What did Kumārila Bhaṭṭa mean by Svataḥ Prāmāṇya?” Journal of the American Oriental Society 112.2: 204–221.
-
Tarkatīrtha, Pandit Visvabandhu. 1992. “The Nyāya on the Meaning of Some Words.” Trans. with Explanatory notes by J.L. Shaw. Journal of Indian Philosophy 20.1: 41–88.
-
Torella, Raffaele. 2004. “How is Verbal Signification Possible: Understanding Abhinavagupta’s Reply.” Journal of Indian Philosophy 32.2–3: 173–188.
-
Torella, Raffaele. 1992. “The Pratyabhijñā and the Logico-Epistemological School of Buddhism.” In Ritual and Speculation in Early Tantrism: Studies in Honor of André Padoux. Ed. by Teun Goudriaan. 327–345. Albany, N.Y.: SUNY Press.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 536 | 236 | 15 |
| Full Text Views | 65 | 2 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 98 | 4 | 0 |
Somānanda on the Meaningfulness of Language
In: Indo-Iranian JournalSearch for other papers by John Nemec in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
The present article examines Somānanda’s understanding of the denotative capacity of speech (śabda) as presented in his Śivadṛṣṭi, āhnika four. Somānanda argues that this denotative capacity is innate in words because based in a real sāmānya or universal; that a permanent connection links śabda and its object (artha), not convention (saṃketa); and that the referent of speech is an object innately imbued with linguistic capacity in the form of an ever-present, innate sāmānya. Each of these positions is also supported by the Mīmāṃsā, and Somānanda, citing both Śabara and Kumārila, assents to their positions on these points on the understanding that they may only be accepted as philosophically sound if one presumes the existence of a Śaiva non-duality of all as Śiva-as-consciousness. These positions, in turn, are all deployed as arguments against those of the Buddhist Pramāṇa Theorists, whose views in each of these three areas Somānanda contests.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 536 | 236 | 15 |
| Full Text Views | 65 | 2 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 98 | 4 | 0 |
