Effective and efficient strategy is central to university internationalization. This study focused on 50 top research universities worldwide to compare their international endeavors through in-depth analysis of their publicly stated international strategies. The study conducted a typological analysis of those world-class research universities at macro, meso and micro levels. The findings point to a set of generic strategies across the universities, as well as various specific strategies at individual universities. We provide a conceptual framework to describe, explain and evaluate university international strategies.
ArumStephenVan de WaterJackKlasekC. Carbondale“The need for a definition of international education in
u.s. universities”Bridges to the Futures: Strategies for Internationalizing Higher Education1992CarbondaleAssociation of International Education Administrators191203
HudzikJoho KComprehensive Internationalization: From Concept to Action2011Accessed August 7, 2014Wastington, D.C.Association of International Educators (NAFSA)http://www.nafsa.org/uploadedFiles/NAFSA_Home/Resource_Library_Assets/Publications_Library/2011_Comprehen_Internationalization.pdf
MaringeFelixFoskettNickWoodfieldSteve“Emerging Internationalization Models in an Uneven Global Terrain: Findings from a Global Survey.”Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education2013431936
ZhongZhouUlicnaDanielaHanShuangmiao“The eu and China: the Race for Talent The Relevance and Responsiveness of Education and Training”Internationalization of Higher Education: An eaie Handbook2015BerlinRaabe Academic Publishers132European Association for International Education