This study explores engineering design students’ perceptions of humor in the experiences of creativity development in Project-Organized Groups (pogs). This study links theories including humor, learning, creativity, and engineering design in one framework. Empirically, this study carried out interviews with a total of 13 students in engineering design education at Northeastern University (neu) in China. We found that students think all humorous people are creative, and they welcome humor in project groups; they also regard humor as not only a personality or communication tool, but also the outcome of applying creative ideas in design practice. The students additionally think that humor is mainly used to keep individuals’ harmonious relationship with the group and that humor is the immediate ability to create using language in ongoing communication contexts. These findings are helpful to unpack the black box of humor from a learner’s perspective and contribute to future joint efforts of studies on humor and creativity in engineering design education.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Amabile Teresa M Creativity in Context 1996 Boulder Westview Press
Cayirdag Nur & Acar Selcuk “Relationships Between Styles of Humor and Divergent Thinking.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 2010 2 no. 2 3236 3240
Chen XiaoYing “On Origins of ‘Humor’.” Journal of Aesthetic Study and Appreciation 1982 no. 1 60 65
Cohen Louis , Manion Lawrence & Morrison Keith Research Methods in Education 2007 London Routledge
Craft Anna Creativity in Schools: Tensions and Dilemmas 2005 London Routledge
Ditlow Florence “The Missing Element in Health Care, Humor as a Form of Creativity.” Journal of Holistic Nursing 1993 11 no. 1 66 79
Ekvall Göran “Organizational Climate for Creativity and Innovation.” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 1996 5 no. 1 105 123
Freud Sigmund Strachey James Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious 1960 New York W. W. Norton & Company (Original work published 1905)
Frymier Ann Bainbridge , Wanzer Melissa Bekelja & Wojtaszczyk Ann M. “Assessing Students’ Perceptions of Inappropriate and Appropriate Teacher Humor.” Communication Education 2008 57 no. 2 266 288
Gero John S “Creativity, Emergence and Evolution in Design.” Knowledge-Based Systems 1996 9 no. 7 435 448
Goncalo Jack A & Staw Barry M. “Individualism-collectivism and Group Creativity.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process 2006 100 96 109
Grossen Michèle “Methods of Studying Collaborative Creativity: An Original and Adventurous Blend.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 2008 3 no. 3 246 249
Humke Christians & Schaefer Charles E. “Sense of Humor and Creativity.” Perceptual and Motor Skills 1996 82 no. 2 544 546
Kim Kyung Hee “Exploring the Interactions between Asian Culture (Confucianism) and Creativity.” Journal of Creative Behavior 2007 41 no. 1 28 53
Lee Yih Hwai & Kim Soon Ang “Brand Name Suggestiveness: A Chinese Language Perspective.” International Journal of Research in Marketing 2003 20 no. 4 323 335
Li Wuwei Keane Michael Li Hui & Guo Marina How Creativity is Changing China 2011 UK Bloomsbury Academic
Liu Katy Wing Yin “Humor Styles, Self-Esteem and Subjective Happiness.” Discovery-ss Student E-Journal 2012 1 21 41
Pahl Gerhard , Beitz Wolfgang , Feldhusen Jörg & Grote Karl-Heinrich Wallace Ken & Blessing Luciënne Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach 2007 London Springer Science & Business Media
Runco Mark A Creativity, Theories and Themes: Research, Development, and Practice 2007 London Elsevier Academic Press
Sawyer Keith R Sawyer Keith R., John-Steiner Vera, Moran Seana, Sternberg Robert J., Feldman David Henry, Gardner Howard, Nakamura Jeanne & Csikszentmihalyi Mihaly “Emergence in Creativity and Development.” Creativity and Development 2003 Oxford Oxford University Press 12 60
Sawyer Keith Group Genius: the Creative Power of Collaboration 2007 New York Basic Books
Sternberg Robert J Handbook of Creativity 1999 New York Cambridge University Press
Ten Have Paul Understanding Qualitative Research and Ethnomethodology 2004 London SAGE Publications
Thompson Graham & Lordan M. “A Review of Creativity Principles Applied to Engineering Design.” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering 1999 213 no. 1 17 31
Torrance Ellis Paul Encouraging Creativity in the Classroom 1970 Dubuque, lowa W. C. Brown Company Publishers
Wallinger Linda M “Don’t Smile Before Christmas: The Role of Humor in Education.” National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin 1997 81 no. 589 27 34
Weber Robert Philip Basic Content Analysis 1990 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA Sage
Yue Xiao Dong “Exploration of Chinese Humor: Historical Review, Empirical Findings, and Critical Reflections.” Humor 2010 23 no. 3 403 420
Zhang Qin “Immediacy, Humor, Power Distance, and Classroom Communication Apprehension in Chinese College Classrooms.” Communication Quarterly 2005 53 no. 1 109 124
Zhou Chunfang Group Creativity Development in Engineering Education in a Problem and Project-Based Learning Environment (pbl) 2012 Aalborg AK Print (Ph.D. Thesis)
Robert J. Sternberg, Handbook of Creativity (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999).
Michèle Grossen, “Methods of Studying Collaborative Creativity: An Original and Adventurous Blend,” Thinking Skills and Creativity 3, no. 3 (2008): 246-249.
Christians Humke and Charles E. Schaefer, “Sense of Humor and Creativity,” Perceptual and Motor Skills 82, no. 2 (1996): 544-546.
Nur Cayirdag and Selcuk Acar, “Relationships Between Styles of Humor and Divergent Thinking,” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 2, no. 2 (2010): 3236-3240.
John S. Gero, “Creativity, Emergence and Evolution in Design,” Knowledge-Based Systems 9, no. 7 (1996): 435-448.
Qin Zhang, “Immediacy, Humor, Power Distance, and Classroom Communication Apprehension in Chinese College Classrooms,” Communication Quarterly 53, no. 1 (2005): 109-124.
Linda M. Wallinger, “Don’t Smile Before Christmas: The Role of Humor in Education,” National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin 81, no. 589 (1997): 27-34.
Zhang, “Immediacy, Humor, Power Distance, in Chinese College Classrooms,” 109-124.
Xiao Dong Yue, “Exploration of Chinese Humor: Historical Review, Empirical Findings, and Critical Reflections,” Humor 23, no. 3 (2010): 403-420.
Mark A. Runco, Creativity, Theories and Themes: Research, Development, and Practice (London: Elsevier Academic Press, 2007).
Graham Thompson and M. Lordan, “A Review of Creativity Principles Applied to Engineering Design,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering 213, no. 1 (1999): 17-31.
Teresa M. Amabile, Creativity in Context (Boulder: Westview Press, 1996).
Keith R. Sawyer, “Emergence in Creativity and Development,” in Creativity and Development, ed. Keith R. Sawyer, et al. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), 12-60.
Anna Craft, Creativity in Schools: Tensions and Dilemmas (London: Routledge, 2005).
Ibid., 107.
Florence Ditlow, “The Missing Element in Health Care, Humor as a Form of Creativity,” Journal of Holistic Nursing 11, no. 1 (1993): 66-79.
Ellis Paul Torrance, Encouraging Creativity in the Classroom (Dubuque, lowa: W. C. Brown Company Publishers, 1970).
Göran Ekvall, “Organizational Climate for Creativity and Innovation” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 5, no. 1 (1996): 105-123.
Gero, “Creativity, Emergence, Evolution in Design,” Knowledge-Based Systems, 435-448.
Cayirdag and Acar, “Relationships Between Styles of Humor and Divergent Thinking,” 3236-3240.
Grossen, “Methods of Studying Collaborative Creativity,” 246-249.
Keith Sawyer, Group Genius: the Creative Power of Collaboration. (New York: Basic Books, 2007).
XiaoYing Chen, “On Origins of “Humor” Journal of Aesthetic Study and Appreciation, no. 1 (1982): 60-65.
Yih Hwai Lee and Kim Soon Ang, “Brand Name Suggestiveness: A Chinese Language Perspective” International Journal of Research in Marketing 20, no. 4 (2003): 323-335.
Jack A. Goncalo and Barry M. Staw, “Individualism-collectivism and Group Creativity” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process 100 (2006): 96-109.
Kyung Hee Kim, “Exploring the Interactions between Asian Culture (Confucianism) and Creativity” Journal of Creative Behavior 41, no. 1 (2007): 28-53.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 293 | 55 | 12 |
Full Text Views | 192 | 0 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 17 | 1 | 0 |
This study explores engineering design students’ perceptions of humor in the experiences of creativity development in Project-Organized Groups (pogs). This study links theories including humor, learning, creativity, and engineering design in one framework. Empirically, this study carried out interviews with a total of 13 students in engineering design education at Northeastern University (neu) in China. We found that students think all humorous people are creative, and they welcome humor in project groups; they also regard humor as not only a personality or communication tool, but also the outcome of applying creative ideas in design practice. The students additionally think that humor is mainly used to keep individuals’ harmonious relationship with the group and that humor is the immediate ability to create using language in ongoing communication contexts. These findings are helpful to unpack the black box of humor from a learner’s perspective and contribute to future joint efforts of studies on humor and creativity in engineering design education.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 293 | 55 | 12 |
Full Text Views | 192 | 0 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 17 | 1 | 0 |