In the context of internationalization of higher education in China, this essay analyzes some inherent differences between the stem disciplines and humanities disciplines when it comes to the internationalization of curriculum and implementation. With a focus on the challenges facing the internationalization of the liberal arts, or humanities disciplines, a functional 3M model, that is, the internationalization of “Mind,” “Method,” and “Medium”, was proposed to address different aspects of the internationalization process. Moreover, we proposed multiple strategies that could possibly promote the professional development of faculty members along the three specific dimensions, aligning the strategies with the working definitions within each dimension of the 3M model.
ChenXuefei“The variations and outcomes of the governmental policy on studying abroad since the reform and opening up in China.” [Gaige kaifang yilai dalu gongpai liuxue jiaoyu zhengce de yanbian ji chengxiao]Fudan jiaoyu luntan20042no. 31216
ZhangHongChenFengSunJiqing“Comparison and analysis with full English teaching curriculums in Shanghai institutions” [Shanghai gaoxiao quan yingyu jiaoxue kecheng bijiao yu fenxi]Jiaoyu jiaoxue luntan2013no. 713
ZhuJiabinYangBoLiuQunqunChenBingRhodesJoan A.MilbyTammy M.“International summer programs: An innovative learning platform in a Chinese context.”Advancing teacher education and curriculum development through study abroad programsIGI Global233249
ZhuangDelinSunChaopin“Obstacles to the implementation of bilingual teaching and corresponding solutions.” [Zhiyue gaoxiao shuangyu jiaoxue de zhuyao yinsu ji duice tantao]Hefei gongye daxue xuebao (Shehui kexue ban)200418no. 4177182