The Policy and Politics of the Cohort Participation Rate in Universities

The Case of Singapore and “SkillsFuture”

in International Journal of Chinese Education
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?


In the media and policy discourses in Singapore, comparisons have often been made with countries like Taiwan and South Korea to validate the Singapore government’s long time policy approach of maintaining the cohort participation rate (cpr) in public universities at around 25% to 30%. Considering the rates of youth unemployment in Taiwan (12.7%) and South Korea (9.5%), where the cpr in universities has hovered around 80% to 90%, it would appear that the problem is one of an over-supply of graduates. While Singapore has maintained a commitment to skills training and to fostering a well-resourced polytechnic sector and the technical and vocational education sector, the government announced in 2012 its plans to raise the country’s cpr in universities to 40% by the year 2020. It established new public-autonomous universities to fulfill this goal, and expanded study places in existing universities, nevertheless with the proviso that internships would central to the curriculum, and that the degrees on offer would be well-tuned to the job shortages in the economy.

What policy and political factors explain this change in Singapore’s long-held approach to the cpr for universities, especially when compared to the cases of Taiwan and South Korea? This paper offers an explanation of the policy and politics that underpinned the issue of the number of university places in Singapore, and also an explanation of the Singapore government’s shift in policy in 2012—albeit a policy move that took place within the context and language of the government’s new SkillsFuture programme, in which the education institutions are expected to continue to be well plugged into the needs of industries.

The Policy and Politics of the Cohort Participation Rate in Universities

The Case of Singapore and “SkillsFuture”

in International Journal of Chinese Education



ChanHeng Chee HuiOng Jin “Politics in an Administrative State: Where Has the Politics Gone?” Understanding Singapore Society 1997 Singapore Times Academic Press 294 306 [republication of original 1974 edition]

ChouChuing Prudence CheolShin JungPostiglioneGerardHuangFutao “Who Benefits from Taiwan’s Mass Higher Education?” Mass Higher Education Development in East Asia: Strategy Quality and Challenges 2015 accessed October 30 2016 Singapore Springer 231 232

Committee on University Education Pathways Beyond 2015 (cuep) Report of the CUEP: Greater Diversity More Opportunities: Final Report 2012 accessed October 30 2016 Singapore Ministry of Education Singapore

DoreRonald “The Diploma Disease Revisited” Institute of Development Studies Bulletin 1980 accessed October 30 2016 11 2

Economic Committee The Singapore Economy: New Directions 1986 Singapore Ministry of Trade and Industry Singapore

Goh Keng Swee and the Education Study Team Report on the Ministry of Education 1978 1979 Singapore Singapore National Printers

Institute of Singapore Chartered Accountants (isca) ISCA Pre-Budget Survey 2016 accessed October 30 2016 Singapore ISCA

Ministry of Education Singapore Applied Study in Polytechnics and Institute of Technical Education Review (ASPIRE) Report: August 2014 accessed October 30 2016

TanKelvinLamPeng Er Lee’s Lieutenants: Singapore’s Old Guard 1999 Sydney Allen & Unwin

World Bank Higher Education: The Lessons of Experience 1994 accessed October 30 2016 Washington, D.C. World Bank 28 39


See for instance: Amelia Teng“Singapore’s Youth Unemployment Rate One of the World’s Lowest: Tan Chuan-Jin,” Straits TimesMay 28 2013 accessed October 30 2016; Ng Jing Yng “As Graduate Numbers Grow a Hard Truth: Not All Degrees Are Equal” Channel NewsAsia May 23 2015 accessed October 30 2016


Chang May Cho“Dream Jobs Prove Elusive for South Korea’s College Grads,” Straits TimesMarch 11 2016 accessed October 30 2016


Jeanette Tan“Contain Singapore’s Rich, Institutionalise Dissent: Donald Low,” Yahoo NewsJanuary 29 2013 accessed October 30 2016


Chan Heng Chee“Politics in an Administrative State: Where Has the Politics Gone?,” in Understanding Singapore Societyed. Ong Jin Hui et al. (Singapore: Times Academic Press 1997 [republication of original 1974 edition]) 294-306.


Kevin Tan and Lam Peng ErLee’s Lieutenants: Singapore’s Old Guard (Sydney: Allen & Unwin1999).


Economic CommitteeThe Singapore Economy: New Directions (Singapore: Ministry of Trade and Industry, Singapore1986).


Loong Swee Yin et al.“Third University Will Have to Wait: Dr Tan,” Straits TimesMarch 21 1989 accessed October 30 2016










Amelia Teng“More Private Schools Make Grade,” Straits TimesDecember 5 2015 accessed October 30 2016


Randolph Tan“Growing Concerns Over Graduate Employment,” Straits TimesSeptember 5 2014 accessed October 30 2016


Chong Zi Liang “Singapore Budget 2015: Every Singaporean Above 25 to Get $500 For a Start Under SkillsFuture” Straits Times February 23 2015 accessed October 30 2016


Ronald Dore“The Diploma Disease Revisited,” Institute of Development Studies Bulletin 11.2 (1980) accessed October 30 2016


Ong Ye Kung“Tensions and Opportunities in Higher Education,” Straits TimesOctober 15 2015.


Calvin Yang“NUS Launches Centre to Promote Lifelong Learning,” Straits TimesJune 18 2016 accessed October 30 2016


Philip Altbach as quoted in: Yuen Sin“Broad-based Learning ‘More Relevant Now’,” Straits TimesAugust 15 2016 accessed October 30 2016

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 10 10 6
Full Text Views 9 9 9
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0