The 1960 Master Plan for Higher Education in California, created by University of California President Clark Kerr and his contemporaries, brought college within reach of millions of American families for the first time and fashioned the world’s strongest system of public research universities. The California idea, combining excellence with access within a tiered system of higher education, and underpinned by a taxpayer consensus on the common good inherent in equality of opportunity in education, became the leading model for higher education across the world. Yet the political conditions supporting the California idea in California itself have evaporated. The taxpayer consensus broke down two decades after the Master Plan began and California no longer provides the fiscal conditions necessary to ensure both excellence and access, especially access for non-white and immigrant families. Many students are now turned away, public tuition is rising, the great research universities face resource challenges, and educational participation in California, once the national leader in the United States, lags far behind. The article traces the rise and partial fall of the Californian system of higher education as embodied in the Master Plan, and draws out lessons for other countries in general, and China in particular.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
arwu “Academic Ranking of World Universities” 2016 Accessed 30 December 2016 http://www.shanghairanking.com/World-University-Rankings-2016/USA.html
Amadae S.M. Rationalizing Capitalist Democracy: The Cold-War Origins of Rational Choice Liberalism 2003 Chicago University of Chicago Press
Arrow Kenneth Social Choice and Individual Values 1963 New York Wiley
Autor David , Katz Lawrence & Kearney Melissa “Trends in U.S. Wage Inequality: Revising the Revisionists” The Review of Economics and Statistics 2008 90 no. 2 300 323
Babcock Philip & Marks Mindy “The Falling Time Cost of College: Evidence from Half a Century of Time Use Data” Review of Economics and Statistics 2011 93 468 478
Buchanan James Post-socialist Political Economy 1997 Lyme, Conn Edward Elgar
Callan Patrick Rothblatt Sheldon “The Perils of Success” Clark Kerr’s World of Higher Education Reaches the 21st Century: Chapters in a Special History 2012 Dordrecht Springer 61 84
Dorling Danny Inequality and the 1% 2014 London Verso
Douglass John The Californian Idea and American Higher Education: 1850 to the 1960 Master Plan 2000 Stanford Stanford University Press
Douglass John “Can We Save the College Dream?” Boom: A Journal of California 2011a 1 no. 2 25 42
Douglass John To Grow or not to Grow? A Post-Great Recession Synopsis of the Political, Financial, and Social Contract Challenges Facing the University of California 2013 Berkeley Center for Studies in Higher Education, University of California Berkeley Research and Occasional Paper cshe 15.13
Goodman David Class in Contemporary China 2014 Cambridge Polity
Hansen Hal “Rethinking Certification Theory and the Educational Development of the United States and Germany” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 2011 29 31 55
Huang F. “Building the World-Class Research Universities: A Case Study of China” Higher Education online doi 10.1007/s10734-015-9876-8.2015
Kerr Clark The Uses of the University 2001a Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press
Kerr Clark The Gold and the Blue: A Personal Memoir of the University of California, 1949-1967 2001b Berkeley University of California Press
Lukes Steven Individualism 1973 Oxford Basil Blackwell
Marginson Simon Araya D. & Marber P. “Emerging Higher Education in the Post-Confucian Heritage Zone” Higher Education in the Global Age 2013 New York Routledge 89 112
Marginson Simon Higher Education and the Common Good 2016 Melbourne Melbourne University Press
Mettler Suzanne Degrees of Inequality: How the Politics of Higher Education Sabotaged the American Dream 2014 New York Basic Books
Milanovic Branko “More or Less” Finance and Development 2011 48 no. 3 6 11
Mouw Ted & Kalleberg Arne “Occupations and the Structure of Wage Inequality in the United States 1980s to 2000s” American Sociological Review 2010 75 no. 3 402 431
nsf “National Science Foundation” Science and Engineering Indicators 2014 2014 Accessed 30 November 2014 http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind14/
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (oecd) United States: Tackling High Inequalities, Creating Opportunities for All 2014 Paris OECD
oecd “Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development” Main Science and Technology Indicators 2015 Accessed 30 December 2015 http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=GERD_FUNDS
Pelfrey Patricia Entrepreneurial President: Richard Atkinson and the University of California, 1995-2003 2012 Berkeley University of California Press
The PELL Institute “Indicators of Higher Education Equity in the United States” Accessed 28 September 2016 Co-published with PennAHEAD, Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania http://www.pellinstitute.org/downloads/publications-Indicators_of_Higher_Education_Equity_in_the_US_45_Year_Trend_Report.pdf
Piketty Thomas Capital in the Twenty-first Century 2014 Cambridge, MA Belknap Harvard University Press
Rothblatt Sheldon Education’s Abiding Moral Dilemma: Merit and Worth in the Cross-Atlantic Democracies, 1800-2006 2007 Oxford Symposium Books
Saez Emmanuel “Striking it Richer” The Evolution of Top Incomes in the United States 2013 Accessed 31 March 2017 Berkeley University of California, Berkeley, Department of Economics http://eml.berkeley.edu//~saez/saez-UStopincomes-2012.pdf
Salmi Jamil The Challenge of Establishing World-Class Universities 2009 Washington World Bank Publications
Stiglitz Joseph The Price of Inequality 2013 Penguin London
unesco “United Nations Educational, Social and Cultural Organization” UNESCO Institute for Statistics Data on Education 2017 Accessed 31 March 2017 http://data.uis.unesco.org/
University of Leiden Leiden Ranking 2016 2017 Accessed 31 March 2017 http://www.leidenranking.com/ranking/
Wilton John 2014 Data supplied by Vice-Chancellor, Administration and Finance, University of California Berkeley
Wolff Edward & Zacharias Ajit “Class Structure and Economic Inequality” Cambridge Journal of Economics 2013 37 1381 1406
David Goodman, Class in Contemporary China (Cambridge: Polity, 2014).
John Douglass, The Californian Idea and American Higher Education: 1850 to the 1960 Master Plan (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000).
John Douglass, The Californian Idea and American Higher Education: 1850 to the 1960 Master Plan (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000).
Sheldon Rothblatt, Education’s Abiding Moral Dilemma: Merit and Worth in the Cross-Atlantic Democracies, 1800-2006 (Oxford: Symposium Books, 2007).
Patrick Callan, “The Perils of Success,” in Clark Kerr’s World of Higher Education Reaches the 21st Century: Chapters in a Special History, ed. Sheldon Rothblatt (Dordrecht: Springer, 2012), 61-84.
John Douglass, “Can We Save the College Dream?” Boom: A Journal of California 1, no. 2 (2011a): 25-42.
Sheldon Rothblatt, Education’s Abiding Moral Dilemma: Merit and Worth in the Cross-Atlantic Democracies, 1800-2006 (Oxford: Symposium Books, 2007).
Hal Hansen, “Rethinking Certification Theory and the Educational Development of the United States and Germany,” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, no. 29 (2011): 31-55.
John Douglass, “Can We Save the College Dream?” Boom: A Journal of California 1, no. 2 (2011a): 25-42.
Patricia Pelfrey, Entrepreneurial President: Richard Atkinson and the University of California, 1995-2003 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2012).
Kenneth Arrow, Social Choice and Individual Values (New York: Wiley, 1963).
Steven Lukes, Individualism (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1973); S.M. Amadae, Rationalizing Capitalist Democracy: The Cold-War Origins of Rational Choice Liberalism (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003).
James Buchanan, Post-socialist Political Economy (Lyme, Conn: Edward Elgar, 1997).
Emmanuel Saez, “Striking it Richer,” The Evolution of Top Incomes in the United States. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, Department of Economics (2013), accessed 31 March 2017, http://eml.berkeley.edu//~saez/saez-UStopincomes-2012.pdf.
Branko Milanovic, “More or Less,” in Finance and Development (2011), 6-11; Thomas Piketty, Capital in the Twenty-first Century (Cambridge, ma: Belknap Harvard University Press, 2014); Joseph Stiglitz, The Price of Inequality (Penguin: London, 2013).
Suzanne Mettler, Degrees of Inequality: How the Politics of Higher Education Sabotaged the American Dream (New York: Basic Books, 2014).
Jamil Salmi, The Challenge of Establishing World-Class Universities (Washington: World Bank Publications, 2009); F Huang, “Building the World-Class Research Universities: A Case Study of China,” in Higher Education online doi 10.1007/s10734-015-9876-8 (2015).
Simon Marginson, Higher Education and the Common Good (Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 2016).
Simon Marginson, “Emerging higher education in the post-Confucian heritage zone,” in Higher Education in the Global Age, ed. D. Araya and P. Marber (New York: Routledge, 2013), 89-112.
David Goodman, Class in Contemporary China (Cambridge: Polity, 2014).
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 622 | 99 | 12 |
Full Text Views | 250 | 0 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 50 | 1 | 0 |
The 1960 Master Plan for Higher Education in California, created by University of California President Clark Kerr and his contemporaries, brought college within reach of millions of American families for the first time and fashioned the world’s strongest system of public research universities. The California idea, combining excellence with access within a tiered system of higher education, and underpinned by a taxpayer consensus on the common good inherent in equality of opportunity in education, became the leading model for higher education across the world. Yet the political conditions supporting the California idea in California itself have evaporated. The taxpayer consensus broke down two decades after the Master Plan began and California no longer provides the fiscal conditions necessary to ensure both excellence and access, especially access for non-white and immigrant families. Many students are now turned away, public tuition is rising, the great research universities face resource challenges, and educational participation in California, once the national leader in the United States, lags far behind. The article traces the rise and partial fall of the Californian system of higher education as embodied in the Master Plan, and draws out lessons for other countries in general, and China in particular.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 622 | 99 | 12 |
Full Text Views | 250 | 0 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 50 | 1 | 0 |