The current research explores links between university productivity and student success in Australia. Interviews were conducted with 15 stakeholders and experts on the topic of higher education productivity. The research uses qualitative methods to identify instances when participants discussed institutional productivity in conjunction with student success factors. Four common themes emerged that linked institutional productivity to student success: “Student experience and engagement,” “attrition, retention and progression,” “cross-subsidies,” and “teaching-research effort.” Findings reveal two feasible options for improving productivity estimation for the education function of universities. Findings also reveal leverage points for intervention to improve student success and productivity. The research highlights where mutual interests lie for managing resources and facilitating better student outcomes.
Altbach, Philip G, LizReisberg, and Laura ERumbley. “Trends in Global Higher Education: Tracking an Academic Revolution Trends in Global Higher Education: Tracking an Academic Revolution,”no.July (2009).
Cantwell, Brendan. “Are International Students Cash Cows? Examining the Relationship Between New International Undergraduate Enrollments and Institutional Revenue at Public Colleges and Universities in the US.”Journal of International Students512, no. 4 (2015): 512-525.
Drengenberg, Nicholas, and AlanBain. “If All You Have Is a Hammer, Everything Begins to Look like a Nail—How Wicked Is the Problem of Measuring Productivity in Higher Education?”Higher Education Research & Development36, no. 4 (June7, 2017): 660-673.
Eastman, Jacqueline K., MariaAviles, and Mark D.Hanna. “Determinants of Perceived Learning and Satisfaction in Online Business Courses: An Extension to Evaluate Differences Between Qualitative and Quantitative Courses.”Marketing Education Review27, no. 1 (2017): 51-62.
Kuh, George D., JillianKinzie, Jennifer A.Buckley, Brian K.Bridges, and John C.Hayek. Piecing Together the Student Success Puzzle Research, Propositions, and Recommendations: ASHE Higher Education Report, Volume 32, Number 5. John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
Liu, Ye, AndyGreen, and NicolaPensiero. “Expansion of Higher Education and Inequality of Opportunities: A Cross-National Analysis.”Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management38, no. 3 (2016): 242-263.
Moore, Kenneth, HamishCoates, and GwilymCroucher. “Understanding and Improving Higher Education Productivity.” In Research Handbook on Quality, Performance and Accountability in Higher Education, edited by EllenHazelkorn, HamishCoates, and A. C.McCormick. In Press: Edward Elgar, 2018.
Moore, Kenneth, HamishCoates, and GwilymCroucher. “Investigating applications of university productivity measurement models using Australian data.”Studies in Higher Education, 2018. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2018.1479846.
Titus, Marvin A., and KevinEagan. “Examining Production Efficiency in Higher Education: The Utility of Stochastic Frontier Analysis.” In Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, edited by M.Paulsen, Vol. 31. Dordrecht: Springer International Publishing, 2016.
Trow, Martin. “Reflections on the Transition from Elite to Mass to Universal Access: Forms and Phases of Higher Education in Modern Societies since WWII.” In International Handbook of Higher Education, 243-280. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2007.