Improving Higher Education Productivity and Its Measurement: Linking Productivity and Student Success in Australia

In: International Journal of Chinese Education

Abstract

The current research explores links between university productivity and student success in Australia. Interviews were conducted with 15 stakeholders and experts on the topic of higher education productivity. The research uses qualitative methods to identify instances when participants discussed institutional productivity in conjunction with student success factors. Four common themes emerged that linked institutional productivity to student success: “Student experience and engagement,” “attrition, retention and progression,” “cross-subsidies,” and “teaching-research effort.” Findings reveal two feasible options for improving productivity estimation for the education function of universities. Findings also reveal leverage points for intervention to improve student success and productivity. The research highlights where mutual interests lie for managing resources and facilitating better student outcomes.

  • AltbachPhilip GLiz Reisberg and Laura E Rumbley. “Trends in Global Higher Education: Tracking an Academic Revolution Trends in Global Higher Education: Tracking an Academic Revolution,” no. July (2009).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Australia Productivity Commission. “University Education, Shifting the Dial.” Canberra2017.

  • BairamErkin. Homogeneous and Nonhomogeneous Production Functions: Theory and Applications. Avebury1994.

  • BarnettRonald. Improving Higher Education: Total Quality Care. Society for Research into Higher Education1992.

  • BesankoD.R. R. Braeutigam and K. Rockett. “Inputs and Production Functions 6.1,” 5th ed.183-220. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley2015.

  • BexleyE.R. James and S. Arkoudis. “The Australian Academic Profession in Transition.” Melbourne, Australia2011.

  • BowmanNicholas A. “Validity of College Self-Reported Gains at Diverse Institutions.” Educational Researcher 40no. 1 (January 12011): 22-24.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CantwellBrendan. “Are International Students Cash Cows? Examining the Relationship Between New International Undergraduate Enrollments and Institutional Revenue at Public Colleges and Universities in the US.” Journal of International Students 512no. 4 (2015): 512-525.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CariniRobert M.George D. Kuh and Stephen P. Klein. “Student Engagement and Student Learning: Testing the Linkages*.” Research in Higher Education 47no. 1 (February 2006): 1-32.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CoatesHamish. The Market for Learning. Singapore: Springer Singapore2017.

  • CoffeyAmanda and Paul Atkinson. Making Sense of Qualitative Data: Complementary Research Strategies. Sage Publications1996.

  • CollierPeter. “Why Peer Mentoring Is an Effective Approach for Promoting College Student Success.” Metropolitan Universities 28no. 3 (2017): 9.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Department of Education and Training. “The Higher Education Reform Package.” Canberra2017.

  • DrengenbergNicholas and Alan Bain. “If All You Have Is a Hammer, Everything Begins to Look like a Nail—How Wicked Is the Problem of Measuring Productivity in Higher Education?” Higher Education Research & Development 36no. 4 (June 72017): 660-673.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • EastmanJacqueline K.Maria Aviles and Mark D. Hanna. “Determinants of Perceived Learning and Satisfaction in Online Business Courses: An Extension to Evaluate Differences Between Qualitative and Quantitative Courses.” Marketing Education Review 27no. 1 (2017): 51-62.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FairweatherJames S. “Academic Research and Instruction: The Industrial Connection.” The Journal of Higher Education 60no. 4 (1989): 388-407.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FallonDaniel. The German University: A Heroic Ideal in Conflict with the Modern World. Colorado Associated University Press1980.

  • HarlandTony and Navé Wald. “Vanilla Teaching as a Rational Choice: The Impact of Research and Compliance on Teacher Development.” Teaching in Higher EducationOctober 2720171-16.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HarperShaun R. and Stephen John Quaye. Student Engagement in Higher Education : Theoretical Perspectives and Practical Approaches for Diverse Populations. Routledge2009.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HazelkornEllen. Rankings and the Reshaping of Higher Education : The Battle for World-Class Excellence. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan: [distributor] Macmillan(US)2015. 2015.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • JaegerDavid A. and Marianne E. Page. “Degrees Matter: New Evidence on Sheepskin Effects in the Returns to Education.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 78no. 4 (November 1996): 733.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KahuElla R. and Karen Nelson. “Student Engagement in the Educational Interface: Understanding the Mechanisms of Student Success.” Higher Education Research and Development 37no. 1 (2018): 58-71.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KnightJane. “Concepts, Complexities and Challenges.” In International Handbook of Higher Education edited by James J.F. Forest and Philip G. Altbach207-227. Springer2007.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KuhGeorge D. Student Success in College: Creating Conditions That Matter. 1st ed. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass2010.

  • KuhGeorge D.Jillian KinzieJennifer A. BuckleyBrian K. Bridges and John C. Hayek. Piecing Together the Student Success Puzzle Research Propositions and Recommendations: ASHE Higher Education Report Volume 32 Number 5. John Wiley & Sons2011.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KuhGeorge D.Jillian KinzieJennifer A BuckleyBrian K Bridges and John C Hayek. “What Matters to Student Success: A Review of the Literature,” 2006.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LiuYeAndy Green and Nicola Pensiero. “Expansion of Higher Education and Inequality of Opportunities: A Cross-National Analysis.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 38no. 3 (2016): 242-263.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MannSarah J. “Alternative Perspectives on the Student Experience : Alienation and Engagement.” Studies in Higher Education 26no. 1 (2001): 7-19.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MassyWilliam F. Reengineering the University : How to Be Mission Centered Market Smart and Margin Conscious. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press2016.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McDonaldDebi. “Doing More with Less: Five Trends in Higher Education Design.” Planning for Higher Education Journal 42no. 1 (2013): 1-5.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MillerBarbara A. Assessing Organizational Performance in Higher Education. Jossey-Bass2007.

  • MooreKennethHamish Coates and Gwilym Croucher. “Understanding and Improving Higher Education Productivity.” In Research Handbook on Quality Performance and Accountability in Higher Education edited by Ellen HazelkornHamish Coates and A. C. McCormick. In Press: Edward Elgar2018.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MooreKennethHamish Coates and Gwilym Croucher. “Investigating applications of university productivity measurement models using Australian data.” Studies in Higher Education2018. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2018.1479846.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NeumannRuth. “Researching the Teaching-Research Nexus: A Critical Review.” Australian Journal of Education 40no. 1 (1996): 5-18.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NichollsGill. Professional Development in Higher Education : New Dimensions & Directions. Kogan Page2001.

  • NygaardLynn P. “Publishing and Perishing: An Academic Literacies Framework for Investigating Research Productivity.” Studies in Higher Education 42no. 3 (2017): 519-532.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ParkJin Heum. “Estimation of Sheepskin Effects Using the Old and the New Measures of Educational Attainment in the Current Population Survey.” Economics Letters 62no. 2 (February 11999): 237-240.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SchoferEvan and John W. Meyer. “Education in the Twentieth Century.” American Sociological Review 70no. December (2005): 898-920.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SullivanTeresa A.Christopher MackieWilliam F Massy and Esha Sinha. “Improving Measurement of Productivity in Higher Education.” Washington, DC: National Academies Press2012.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • TitusMarvin A. and Kevin Eagan. “Examining Production Efficiency in Higher Education: The Utility of Stochastic Frontier Analysis.” In Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research edited by M. PaulsenVol. 31. Dordrecht: Springer International Publishing2016.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • TompkinsRicky and Laura Cates. “Non-Academic Assessment in an Accountability World: Achieving More with Less.” Community College Journal of Research and Practice 33no. 11 (2009): 953-955.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • TrowMartin. “Problems in the Transition from Elite to Mass Higher Education.” Berkeley, CA1973.

  • TrowMartin. “Reflections on the Transition from Elite to Mass to Universal Access: Forms and Phases of Higher Education in Modern Societies since WWII.” In International Handbook of Higher Education243-280. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands2007.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WilliamsonKirsty and Graeme Johanson eds. Research Methods; Information Systems and Context. 1st Edition. Prarhan, Australia: Tilde Publishing and Distribution2013.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 209 168 11
Full Text Views 93 93 1
PDF Downloads 15 15 2