A considerable number of Chinese postgraduate students with strong academic and professional competences choose to stay abroad, despite the Chinese government’s success in attracting many overseas students. The paper explores the main considerations of these highly qualified non-returnees in choice-making between staying in the host country and returning home after graduation. The paper uses the Push-Pull framework to analyze online interview data with 12 participants. A hybrid “opportunity-constraint” heuristic has been extracted, and three types of Chinese overseas postgraduate students’ identities as stayers, nomads, and future returnees have been displayed. They emphasized career and individual development spaces, including access to different career choices, professional development, favorable social environment and lifestyle, and cultural recognition. This paper outlines the connection of Chinese students’ identity changes through international learning and decision making, provides insights for further analysis of the “brain drain,” “brain gain,” and “brain circulation.”
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Altbach, P. G. (1998). Comparative higher education: Knowledge, the university and development. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.
Altbach, P. G. (2002). Centers and peripheries in the academic profession: The special challenges of developing countries. In P. G. Altbach (Ed.), The Decline of the Guru: The Academic Profession in Developing and Middle-income Countreis (pp. 1–21). New York: Palgrave.
Baker, C. (2001). Membership categorization and interview accounts. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice. London: Sage.
Bian, Y. (2019). Guanxi, how China works. John Wiley & Sons.
Cai, S., Jun, M., & Yang, Z. (2010). Implementing supply chain information integration in China: The role of institutional forces and trust. Journal of Operations Management, 28(3), 257–268.
Cao, C., Zhu, C., & Meng, Q. (2015). A Survey of the Influencing Factors for International Academic Mobility of Chinese University Students. Higher Education Quarterly, 70(2), 200–220.
Cao, J. (2009). The Analysis of Tendency of Transition from Collectivism to Individualism in China. Cross-Cultural Communication, 5(4), 42–50.
Chen, C. G., & Liu, C. M. (2003). Talents’ Return and Utilization. Guangzhou: Guangdong People’s Press. (In Chinese).
Chen, X. (2000). Qualitative research in social sciences. (In Chinese). Beijing: Education Science Press.
Choi, S., & Nieminen, T. A. (2013). Factors influencing the higher education of international students from Confucian East Asia. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(2), 161–173.
Dai, K. (2020). Learning between two systems: A Chinese student’s reflexive narrative in a China-Australia articulation programme. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 50(3), 371–390.
Egri, C. P., & Ralston, D. A. (2004). Generation Cohorts and Personal Values: A Comparison of China and the United States. Organization Science, 15(2), 210–220.
Fan, W., Cai, X., & Li, Q. (2013). A Comparative Study of Policies Concerning Entrepreneurial Returnees. In H. Wang & L. Miao (Eds.), Blue Book of Global Talent. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press (China). (In Chinese).
Gill, S. (2007). Overseas students’ intercultural adaptation as intercultural learning: A transformative framework. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 37(2), 167–183.
Gong, X., & Huybers, T. (2015). Chinese students and higher education destinations: Findings from a choice experiment. Australian Journal of Education, 59(2), 196–218.
Hao, J., & Welch, A. (2012). A Tale of Sea Turtles: Job-Seeking Experiences of Hai Gui (High-Skilled Returnees) in China. Higher Education Policy, 25(2), 243–260.
Hao, J., Wen, W., & Welch, A. (2016). When sojourners return: Employment opportunities and challenges facing high-skilled Chinese returnees. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 25(1), 22–40.
Kellogg, R. P. (2010). Chinese S&E Graduate Students in the US: The Increasing Lure of the Economic Boom Back Home? Paper presented at the 51st International Studies Association Annual Conference.
Li, M., & Bray, M. (2007). Cross-border flows of students for higher education: Push—pull factors and motivations of mainland Chinese students in Hong Kong and Macau. Higher Education(53), 791–818.
Marginson, S. (2014). Student self-formation in international education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 18(1), 6–22.
Mazzarol, T., & Soutar, G. N. (2002). The Push-Pull Factors Influencing International Student Selection of Education Destination. International Journal of Educational Management, 16(2), 82–89.
Miller, J., & Glassner, B. (2004). The “inside” and the “outside”: Finding realities in interviews. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative Research: Theory, Methods and Practice. London: Sage.
Ministry of Education. (2018). The statistics of outbound students in China in 2018. (In Chinese). Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/gzdt_gzdt/s5987/201903/t20190327_375704.html.
Musumba, M., Jin, Y., & Mjelde, J. W. (2009). Factors influencing career location preferences of international graduate students in the United States. Education Economics, 19(5), 501–517.
Oleksiyenko, A., Cheng, K.-M., & Yip, H.-K. (2012). International student mobility in Hong Kong: private good, public good, or trade in services. Studies in Higher Education, 38(7), 1079–1101.
Peters, M. A., Wang, H., Ogunniran, M. O., Huang, Y., Green, B., Chunga, J. O., ... & Khomera, S. W. (2020). China’s internationalized higher education during Covid-19: collective student autoethnography. Postdigital Science and Education, 1.
Porschitz, E., Guo, C., & Alves, J. (2012). ‘Going through the mist’: Early career transitions of Chinese millennial returnees. In Ng, E. S., Lyons, S. T. & Schweitzer, L. (Eds.). Managing the new workforce: International perspectives on the millennial generation (pp. 86–106). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Saxenian, A. (2005). From Brain Drain to Brain Circulation: Transnational Communities and Regional Upgrading in India and China. Studies in Comparative International Development, Summer (40), 35–61.
Seidman, I. (1998). Interviewing as qualitative research: a guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (2nd ed.). New York; London: Teachers College Press.
Tharenou, P., & Seet, P.-S. (2014). China’s reverse brain drain: Regaining and retaining talent. International Studies of Management & Organization, 44(2), 55–74.
Tian, L. (2003). Research on China’s Foreign Cultural Exchange in Higher Education. Beijing: The Ethnic Publishing House. (In Chinese).
Tran, L. T. (2016). Mobility as ‘becoming’: A Bourdieuian analysis of the factors shaping international student mobility. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37(8), 1268–1289.
Wang, H. (2013). Migration tide: how China makes talents stay. Beijing: Zhongxin Press. (In Chinese).
Wang, T. (2020). The COVID-19 Crisis and Cross-Cultural Experience of China’s International Students: A Possible Generation of Glocalized Citizens? ECNU Review of Education, 1–6.
Welch, A. R., & Zhen, Z. (2008). Higher Education and Global Talent Flows: Brain Drain, Overseas Chinese Intellectuals, and Diasporic Knowledge Networks. Higher Education Policy, 21(4), 519–537.
Wen, W., & Shen, W. (2016). After Graduation: the Contribution of Former International Students in Their Home Countries. Research Digest, 11.
Yang, L., Sing, H. F., & Ping, C. Y. (2013). Chinese students’ choice of major when considering higher education abroad: the case of Mainland China. China: An International Journal, 11(1), 94–112.
Yang, R. (2013). Indigenizing the Western concept of university: the Chinese experience. Asia Pacific Education Review, 14, 85–92.
Yang, R. (2020). Benefits and challenges of the international mobility of researchers: the Chinese experience. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 18(1), 53–65.
Zhang, X., Lu, J., Lin, D., & Wang, H. (2012). Analyses of Motives, Barriers, and Effects of Policies on Returnees. (In Chinese). In H. Wang (Ed.), Annual Report on Chinese Returnee Entrepreneurship (2012) No.1. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press (China).
Zong, L., & Lu, Y. (2017). Reconceptualization of “Brain Drain”: The Transnational Mobility of Talent in Canada and China. International Journal of Chinese Education, 6(2), 288–314.
Zweig, D. (2013). Luring Back the Chinese Who Study Abroad. The New York Times, 21 January. Accessed 30 August 2020 https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2013/01/21/the-effects-of-chinas-push-for-education/luring-back-the-chinese-who-study-abroad.
Zweig, D., & Ge, Z. (2018). How Chinese students who return home after studying abroad succeed—and why they don’t. South China Morning Post. Accessed 30 August 2020. Retrieved from https://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/asia/article/2157081/how-chinese-students-who-return-home-after-studying.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1491 | 942 | 103 |
Full Text Views | 76 | 8 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 136 | 8 | 0 |
A considerable number of Chinese postgraduate students with strong academic and professional competences choose to stay abroad, despite the Chinese government’s success in attracting many overseas students. The paper explores the main considerations of these highly qualified non-returnees in choice-making between staying in the host country and returning home after graduation. The paper uses the Push-Pull framework to analyze online interview data with 12 participants. A hybrid “opportunity-constraint” heuristic has been extracted, and three types of Chinese overseas postgraduate students’ identities as stayers, nomads, and future returnees have been displayed. They emphasized career and individual development spaces, including access to different career choices, professional development, favorable social environment and lifestyle, and cultural recognition. This paper outlines the connection of Chinese students’ identity changes through international learning and decision making, provides insights for further analysis of the “brain drain,” “brain gain,” and “brain circulation.”
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1491 | 942 | 103 |
Full Text Views | 76 | 8 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 136 | 8 | 0 |