Long-Distance Movements by Fire Salamanders (Salamandra Infraimmaculata) and Implications for Habitat Fragmentation

In: Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution

Dispersal may be particularly important for the regional persistence of metapopulations that experience local extinctions. Some amphibian species are structured as metapopulations. Long-term persistence of these species should depend on natural connections between local subpopulations through dispersal. We explored movement distances of fire salamander adults (Salamandra infraimmaculata), a locally endangered species, on Mt. Carmel, northern Israel, and investigated the implications of movement for persistence of populations.

During the breeding seasons (November-March) of 1999-2000 and 2002-2006, capture-recapture surveys were conducted around four breeding sites and along unpaved roads connecting them. Out of 300 adult salamander captures, 72 cases were recaptures. Most of the recaptures were in the same site as the initial capture. In eight cases (11%), however, salamanders were recaptured at least 400 m away from the first site. The maximum direct distances between capture-recapture sites (1100-1300 m) were greater than previously documented and indicated potential connectivity between breeding sites.

We then examined the potential implications of habitat fragmentation, i.e., isolation of a breeding site, on population persistence by calculating local extinction risks of one of the sites assuming it is an isolated population. Parameters were based on 18 years of count-based data. The high probability of local extinction found by the analysis highlights the severe consequences of fragmentation. Hence, we conclude that it is important to preserve the terrestrial habitats and promote landscape connectivity between breeding sites, in addition to the aquatic sites, in order to enable individual movements between sites and the possibility of a rescue effect.

  • Beebee, T. J. C., Griffiths, R. A. 2005. The amphibian decline crisis: a watershed for conservation biology? Biological Conservation 125: 271-285.

  • Blaustein, A. R., Wake, D. B., Sousa, W. P. 1994. Amphibian declines-judging stability, persistence, and susceptibility of populations to local and global extinctions. Conservation Biology 8: 60-71.

  • Brown, J. H., Kodricbrown, A. 1977. Turnover rates in insular biogeography—effect of immigration on extinction. Ecology 58: 445-449.

  • Colbert, J., Danchin, E., Dhondt, A. A., Nichols, J. D. 2001. Dispersal. Oxford University Press, New York.

  • Cushman, S. A. 2006. Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: a review and prospectus. Biological Conservation 128: 231-240.

  • Degani, G. 1996. Salamandra salamandra at the southern limit of its distribution. Laser Pages Publishing, Jerusalem, Israel, 154 pp.

  • Degani, G., Jackson, K., Dosoretz, K., Plotzki, Y. 1999. Molecular DNA variation in Salamandra salamandra infraimmaculata from different habitats. Israel Journal of Zoology 45: 239-246.

  • Dennis, B., Munholland, P. L., Scott, J. M. 1991. Estimation of growth and extinction parameters for endangered species. Ecological Monographs 61: 115-144.

  • Dodd, C. K., Smith, L. L. 2003. Habitat destruction and alteration, historical trends and future prospects for amphibians. In: Semlitsch, R. D., ed. Amphibian conservation. Smithsonian Books, Washington and London.

  • Dolev, A., Perevolotsky, A. 2004. The red book-vertebrates in Israel. Israel Nature and National Parks Authority and The Society for the Protection of Nature in Israel, Jerusalem, Israel.

  • Funk, W. C., Greene, A. E., Corn, P. S., Allendorf, F. W. 2005. High dispersal in a frog species suggests that it is vulnerable to habitat fragmentation. Biology Letters 1: 13-16.

  • Hanski, I. A., Gilpin, M. E. 1997. Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics and evolution. Academic Press, San Diego, California.

  • Johnson, J. R., Semlitsch, R. D. 2003. Defining core habitat of local populations of the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor) based on choice of oviposition site. Oecologia 137: 205-210.

  • Lesbarreres, D., Lode, T., Merila, J. 2004. What type of amphibian tunnel could reduce road kills? Oryx 38: 220-223.

  • Marsh, D. M., Trenham, P. C., 2001. Metapopulation dynamics and amphibian conservation. Conservation Biology 15: 40-49.

  • Marsh, D. M., Beckman, N. G. 2004. Effects of forest roads on the abundance and activity of terrestrial salamanders. Ecological Applications 14: 1882-1891.

  • Marsh, D. M., Thakur, K. A., Bulka, K. C., Clarke, L. B. 2004. Dispersal and colonization through open fields by a terrestrial, woodland salamander. Ecology 85: 3396-3405.

  • Marsh, D. M., Milam, G. S., Gorham, N. R., Beckman, N. G. 2005. Forest roads as partial barriers to terrestrial salamander movement. Conservation Biology 19: 2004-2008.

  • Morris, W. F., Doak, D. F. 2002. Quantitative conservation biology, theory and practice of population viability analysis. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.

  • Nathan, R., Perry, G., Cronin, J. T., Strand, A. E., Cain, M. L. 2003. Methods for estimating longdistance dispersal. Oikos 103: 261-273.

  • Petranka, J. W., Kennedy, C. A., Murray, S. S. 2003. Response of amphibians to restoration of a southern appalachian wetland: a long-term analysis of community dynamics. Wetlands 23: 1030-1042.

  • Peleg, N., Segev, O., Hill, N., Fahima, T., Tempelton, A. R., Blaustein, L. 2007. Genetic diversity and conservation of the endangered fire salamander on Mt. Carmel and the Lower Galilee (Salamanadra salamandra). Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution 52: 159-204 (Abstract).

  • Porej, D., Micacchion, M., Hetherington, T. E. 2004. Core terrestrial habitat for conservation of local populations of salamanders and wood frogs in agricultural landscapes. Biological Conservation 120: 399-409.

  • Regosin, J. V., Windmiller, B. S., Homan, R. N., Reed, J. M. 2005. Variation in terrestrial habitat use by four poolbreeding amphibian species. Journal of Wildlife Management 69: 1481-1493.

  • Rothermel, B. B. 2004. Migratory success of juveniles: a potential constraint on connectivity for pond-breeding amphibians. Ecological Applications 14: 1535-1546.

  • Rubbo, M. J., Kiesecker, J. M. 2005. Amphibian breeding distribution in an urbanized landscape. Conservation Biology 19: 504-511.

  • Schmidt, B. R., Schaub, M., Steinfartz, S. 2007. Apparent survival of the salamander Salamandra salamandra is low because of high migratory. Frontiers in Zoology 4: 19.

  • Seigel, R. A., Dodd, C. K. 2002. Translocations of amphibians: proven management method or experimental technique? Conservation Biology 16: 552-554.

  • Semlitsch, R. D. 1998. Biological delineation of terrestrial buffer zones for pond-breeding salamanders. Conservation Biology 12: 1113-1119.

  • Semlitsch, R. D. 2003. Amphibian conservation. Smithsonian Books, Washington and London.

  • Smith, M. A., Green, D. M. 2005. Dispersal and the metapopulation paradigm in amphibian ecology and conservation: are all amphibian populations metapopulations? Ecography 28: 110-128.

  • Spencer, M., Schwartz, S. S., Blaustein, L. 2002. Are there fine-scale spatial patterns in community similarity among temporary freshwater pools? Global Ecology and Biogeography 11:71-78.

  • Steinfartz, S., Veith, M., Tautz, D. 2000. Mitochondrial sequence analysis of Salamandra taxa suggests old splits of major lineages and postglacial recolonizations of Central Europe from distinct source populations of Salamandra salamandra.Molecular Ecology 9: 397-410.

  • Stuart, S. N., Chanson, J. S., Cox, N. A., Young, B. E., Rodrigues, A. S. L., Fischman, D. L., Waller, R. W. 2004. Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science 306: 1783-1786.

  • Sztatecsny, M., Schabetsberger, R. 2005. Into thin air: vertical migration, body condition, and quality of terrestrial habitats of alpine common toads, Bufo bufo.Canadian Journal of Zoology-Revue Canadienne de Zoologie 83: 788-796.

  • Templeton, A. R., Robertson, R. J., Brisson, J., Strasburg, J. 2001. Disrupting evolutionary processes: the effect of habitat fragmentation on collared lizards in the Missouri Ozarks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98: 5426-5432.

  • Templeton, A. R., Neuwald, J. L., Brazeal, N. H., Robertson, R. J. 2007. Restoring demographic processes in translocated populations of collared lizards in the Missouri Ozarks through prescribed forest fires. Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution 53: 179-196, this issue.

  • Trakhtenbrot, A., Nathan, R., Perry, G., Richardson, D. M. 2005. The importance of long-distance dispersal in biodiversity conservation. Diversity and Distributions 11: 173-181.

  • Trenham, P. C., Shaffer, H. B. 2005. Amphibian upland habitat use and its consequences for population viability. Ecological Applications 15: 1158-1168.

  • Trenham, P. C., Koenig, W. D., Shaffer, H. B. 2001. Spatially autocorrelated demography and interpond dispersal in the salamander Ambystoma californiense.Ecology 82: 3519-3530.

  • Warburg, M. R., 1994. Population ecology, breeding activity, longevity, and reproductive strategies of Salamandra salamandra during an 18-year long study of an isolated population on Mt. Carmel, Israel. Mertensiella 4: 399-421.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 72 57 3
Full Text Views 13 9 0
PDF Downloads 4 2 0