Save

Butterfly Monitoring Methods: The ideal and the Real World

In: Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution
View More View Less
  • 1 Institute of Environmental Sciences, Jagiellonian Universitypiotr.nowicki@uj.edu.pl
  • | 2 Department of Community Ecology, UFZ—Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research—UFZ
  • | 3 Département Ecologie et Gestion de la Biodiversité—UMR5173/UMR7179, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle
  • | 4 Institute of Environmental Sciences, Jagiellonian University
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€29.95$34.95

Butterflies may serve as indicators of biodiversity trends, but for this purpose reliable methods of monitoring their distribution and abundance are essential. We discuss advantages and disadvantages of the currently used methods and suggest potential refinements, based on methodological advances achieved in other organisms. While assessing butterfly distribution, it is vital to account for imperfect species detection at investigated sites. This can be achieved through conducting repeated presence-absence surveys within a single season, and analyzing data with statistical models that estimate detection probability and site occupancy by a species. Transect counts, predominantly used for assessing butterfly abundance in monitoring programs, are cost-effective and easy to implement, but less reliable than mark-release-recapture sampling frequently applied for the same purpose in research studies. Deficiencies of transect counts stem from the fact that they do not account for individual detection probability and temporal fragmentation of butterfly populations, i.e., the situation in which just a small fraction of individuals belonging to a single generation is present on any day of a season. Consequently, transect counts can only yield relative abundance indices, which presumably correlate well with daily butterfly numbers, but not necessarily with their seasonal population sizes. Possible refinements to transect counts that would allow the estimation of individual detection probability include double observer or double zone approaches. In contrast, finding an effective way to estimate longevity (a measure of temporal fragmentation) with transect counts seems impossible. Instead, efforts should be made to evaluate how variation in longevity affects transect-count results.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1183 334 25
Full Text Views 77 22 15
PDF Views & Downloads 66 25 9