Getting the Public Involved in Butterfly Conservation: Lessons Learned from a New Monitoring Scheme in Germany

in Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.

Help

 

Have Institutional Access?

Login with your institution. Any other coaching guidance?

Connect

In 2005 a nationwide monitoring scheme for butterflies (and diurnal moths) was launched in Germany. Coordinated by the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research—UFZ, it started as an integral part of the public relations campaign "Abenteuer Schmetterling" (Adventure Butterfly) with German public television and an environmental NGO as partners. The core objectives of the monitoring scheme are (a) to provide a central element for the analysis of biodiversity and (b) to investigate and develop the role of butterflies as indicators for the state of biodiversity. Both are aims at a regional, national, and European scale. After three years of monitoring (2005-2007), first results and experiences are presented. We show that the use of multiple media (TV, internet, community-level activities) yielded high responsiveness from the public and high recruitment of volunteers. We further show that the quality of data is likely to qualify for scientific analyses of abundances and phenology and therefore possibly for the recognition of long-term trends. Main lessons learned for the successful establishment of a volunteer-based monitoring scheme are that (a) an institution that hosts such a project should be able to provide long-term basic financial and personnel resources; (b) the media can play a vital role in activating a minimum number of volunteers required to start a monitoring project; and (c) the motivation of recorders is the key for success. Therefore permanent coordination, support, motivation activities, continuous contacts with the volunteers, and continuous recruitment of new recorders are all essential to ensure regular data entry and the overall success of such a project.

Getting the Public Involved in Butterfly Conservation: Lessons Learned from a New Monitoring Scheme in Germany

in Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution
References
  • Asher J. Warren M. S. Fox R. Harding P. T. Jeffcoate G. Jeffcoate S. 2001. The millennium atlas of butterflies in Great Britain and Ireland. Oxford University Press Oxford.

  • Chevan A. Sutherland M. 1991. Hierarchical partitioning. American Statistician 45: 90-96.

  • Erhardt A. 1985. Wiesen und Brachland als Lebensraum f�r Schmetterlinge. Eine Feldstudie im Tavetsch (GR) Birkh�user Basel.

  • Erhardt A. Thomas J. A. 1991. Lepidoptera as indicators of change in the semi-natural grasslands of lowland and upland Europe. In: Collins M. Thomas J. A. eds. The conservation of insects and their habitats. Academic Press London pp. 213-236.

  • Harding P. T. Asher J. Yates T. J. 1995. Butterfly monitoring I—recording the changes. In: Pullin A. S. ed. Ecology and conservation of butterflies. Chapman & Hall London p. 20.

  • Hintermann U. Weber D. Zangger A. 2000. Biodiversity monitoring in Switzerland. Schriftenreihe f�r Landschaftspflege und Naturschutz 62: 47-58.

  • Leopold P. Vischer-Leopold M. 2005. Monitoring tagaktiver Schmetterlinge in Nordrhein-Westfalen. L�BF-Mitteilungen Nr. 2/2005: 2-7.

  • Mac Nally R. 2002. Multiple regression and interference in conservation biology and ecology: further comments on identifying important predictor variables. Biodiversity and Conservation 11: 1397-1401.

  • Pollard E. 1977. Method for assessing changes in abundance of butterflies. Biological Conservation 12: 115-134.

  • Pollard E. Yates T. J. 1993. Monitoring butterflies for ecology and conservation. Chapman and Hall London.

  • R Development Core Team. 2006. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing Vienna Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org

  • Randle Z. Simcox D. J. Sch�nrogge K. Wardlaw J. C. Thomas J. A. 2005. Myrmica ants as keystone species and Maculinea arion as an indicator of rare niches in UK grasslands. In: Settele J. K�hn E. Thomas J. A. eds. Studies on the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe Vol. 2: Species ecology along a European gradient: Maculinea butterflies as a model. Pensoft Sofia/Moscow pp. 26-27.

  • Reinhardt R. Sbieschne H. Settele J. Fischer U. Fiedler G. 2007. Tagfalter von Sachsen. In: Klausnitzer B. Reinhardt R. eds. Beitr�ge zur Insektenfauna Sachsens Band 6. Entomologischen Nachrichten und Berichte Beiheft 11 Dresden.

  • Settele J. Hammen V. Hulme P. Karlson U. Klotz S. Kotarac M. Kunin W. Marion G. O'Connor M. Petanidou T. Peterson K. Potts S. Pritchard H. Pysek P. Rounsevell M. Spangenberg J. Steffan-Dewenter I. Sykes M. Vighi M. Zobel M. K�hn I. 2005. ALARM—Assessing LArge-scale environmental Risks for biodiversity with tested Methods. GAIA—Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 14(1): 69-72.

  • Stefanescu C. Dantart L. Lewington R. Llobet T. Miquel A. Salas J. R. 2001. Estat de la xarxa del Butterfly Monitoring Scheme a Catalunya l'any 2001. Cynthia 1: 3-15.

  • Thomas J. A. 2005. Monitoring changes in the abundance and distribution of insects using butterflies and other indicator groups. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B 360: 339-357.

  • Thomas J. A. Morris M. G. 1994. Patterns mechanisms and rates of extinction among invertebrates in the United Kingdom. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B 344: 47-54.

  • Thomas J. A. Telfer M. G. Roy D. B. Preston C. D. Greenwood J. J. D. Asher J. Fox R. Clarke R. T. Lawton J. H. 2004. Comparative losses of British butterflies birds and plants and the global extinction crisis. Science 303: 1879-1881.

  • van Swaay C. A. M. 1996. Handleiding Dagvlindermointoring. De Vlinderstichting Wageningen.

  • van Swaay C. A. M. Maes D. Plate C. 1997. Monitoring butterflies in the Netherlands and Flanders: the first results. Journal of Insect Conservation 1: 81-87.

  • van Swaay C. A. M. Warren M. S. 1999. Red data book of European butterflies (Rhopalocera). Nature and Environment 99: 1-260.

  • van Swaay C. A. M. van Strien A. 2005. Using butterfly monitoring data to develop a European grassland butterfly indicator. In: Kuehn E. Thomas J. A. Feldmann R. Settele J. eds. Studies on the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe Vol. 1: general concepts and case studies. Pensoft Sofia/Moscow pp. 106-107.

  • van Swaay C. A. M. Warren M. S. Lois G. 2006. Biotope use and trends of European butterflies. Journal of Insect Conservation 10: 189-209.

  • Warren M. Hill J. K. Thomas J. A. Asher J. Fox R. Huntley B. Roy D. B. Telfer M. G. Jeffcoate G. Jeffcoate S. Harding P. Willis S. G. Greatorex-Davies J. N. Moss D. Thomas C. D. 2001. Rapid response of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change. Nature 414: 65-69.

  • Weber D. Hintermann U. Zangger A. 2004. Scale and trends in species richness: considerations for monitoring biological diversity for political purposes. Global Ecology and Biogeography 13

Index Card
Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 103 94 2
Full Text Views 14 14 0
PDF Downloads 9 9 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0