Save

Low Geographic and Subspecific Variation in the Loud Call of the Widespread and Phenotypically Cryptic Northern Lesser Galago (Galago senegalensis) Suggests Taxonomic Uniformity

In: Folia Primatologica
Authors:
Magdalena S. Svensson null

Search for other papers by Magdalena S. Svensson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Thomas M. Butynski null
null

Search for other papers by Thomas M. Butynski in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Yvonne A. de Jong null
null

Search for other papers by Yvonne A. de Jong in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Simon K. Bearder null

Search for other papers by Simon K. Bearder in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Irena Schneiderová null
null

Search for other papers by Irena Schneiderová in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Vincent Nijman null

Search for other papers by Vincent Nijman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Like other nocturnal primates, many species of galago (Galagidae) are phenotypically cryptic, making their taxonomic status difficult to resolve. Recent taxonomic work has disentangled some of the confusion. This has resulted in an increase in the number of recognised galago species. The most widespread galago species, and indeed the most widespread nocturnal primate, is the northern lesser galago (Galago senegalensis) whose geographic range stretches >7,000 km across Africa. Based on morphology, 4 subspecies are currently recognised: G. s. senegalensis, G. s. braccatus, G. s. sotikae and G. s. dunni. We explore geographic and subspecific acoustic variation in G. senegalensis, testing three hypotheses: isolation by distance, genetic basis, and isolation by barrier. There is statistical support for isolation by distance for 2 of 4 call parameters (fundamental frequency and unit length). Geographic distance explains a moderate amount of the acoustic variation. Discriminant function analysis provides some degree of separation of geographic regions and subspecies, but the percentage of misdesignation is high. Despite having (putative) parapatric geographic ranges, the most pronounced acoustic differences are between G. s. senegalensis and G. s. dunni. The findings suggest that the Eastern Rift Valley and Niger River are significant barriers for G. senegalensis. The acoustic structures of the loud calls of 121 individuals from 28 widespread sites are not significantly different. Although this makes it unlikely that additional unrecognised species occur within G. senegalensis at the sites sampled, vast areas of the geographic range remain unsampled. We show that wide-ranging species do not necessarily exhibit large amounts of variation in their vocal repertoire. This pattern may also be present in nocturnal primates with smaller geographic ranges.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 302 158 12
Full Text Views 15 9 0
PDF Views & Downloads 40 32 0