Save

Vocal Repertoire and Intraspecific Variation within Two Loud Calls of the Small-Eared Greater Galago (Otolemur garnettii) in Tanzania and Kenya

In: Folia Primatologica
Authors:
Caroline M. Bettridgenull

Search for other papers by Caroline M. Bettridge in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Simon P. Kenworthynull

Search for other papers by Simon P. Kenworthy in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Thomas M. Butynskinull
null

Search for other papers by Thomas M. Butynski in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Yvonne A. de Jongnull
null

Search for other papers by Yvonne A. de Jong in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Selvino R. de Kortnull

Search for other papers by Selvino R. de Kort in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
View More View Less
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$34.95

Vocal repertoires and call structure can provide insights into the behaviour and evolution of species, as well as aid in taxonomic classification. Nocturnal primates have large vocal repertoires. This suggests that acoustic communication plays an important role in their life histories. Little is known about the behavioural context or the intraspecific variation of their vocalisations. We used autonomous recording units and manual recorders to investigate the vocal behaviour and structure of loud calls of the small-eared greater galago (Otolemur garnettii) in Kenya and Tanzania. We describe the vocal repertoire, temporal calling patterns and structure of 2 loud calls of 2 subspecies: O. g. panganiensis and O. g. kikuyuensis. We found considerable intraspecific structural differences in both loud calls. These are congruent with the current subspecies classification. Differences in vocalisations among populations are not consistent with the “acoustic adaptation hypothesis,” rather they are likely a result of geographic variation due to isolation caused by vegetational barriers in southern Kenya.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 213 169 34
Full Text Views 26 26 5
PDF Views & Downloads 48 48 12