Cultural Genocide and Key International Instruments: Framing the Indigenous Experience

in International Journal on Minority and Group Rights
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?


Since its introduction by Raphael Lemkin during the Second World War, cultural genocide has served as a conceptual framework for the non-physical destruction of a group. Following a vigorous debate over the legitimacy of the concept by states fearing prosecution for ethnocidal acts, namely Australia, the United States, Sweden and Canada, cultural genocide/ethnocide was abrogated from the 1948 Genocide Convention. This pivotal move has shifted the frame of analysis and has sparked a contentious debate about the distinguishing elements of the physical destruction of a people and their cultural dissipation. The achievements of the indigenous peoples’ movement throughout the 1980s reignited the debate surrounding cultural genocide within the international arena. This article is both a survey of cultural genocide of indigenous populations of North America, South America and Australia, as well as the role of indigenous social movements within the international arena. It analyzes the development of cultural genocide within international law by Raphael Lemkin, its subsequent debate by the United Nations’ Ad Hoc Committee on Genocide, its omission from the Genocide Convention, and its reintroduction by indigenous peoples’ mobilization to the international arena. The Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, the Indigenous Peoples Rights Act (Philippines), the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights, the various findings of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia relating to cultural genocide, the conference findings of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe relating to minorities, along with Lemkin’s original reference to the term will be used as frameworks for illuminating the extent and gravity of such crimes.

Cultural Genocide and Key International Instruments: Framing the Indigenous Experience

in International Journal on Minority and Group Rights




UNHCHR 200218.


Schabassupra note 3 pp. 183–184.


Mosessupra note 23 pp. 90–91.


Lemkinsupra note 22 pp. 82–89.


Schabassupra note 3 pp. 183–184.


Burgersupra note 5 p. 30.


E. Rogers‘Aust Adopts UN Indigenous Declaration’ABC AustraliaApril 2009 available at < >.


Niezensupra note 3 p. 182.


Anayasupra note 42 p. 70.


Anayasupra note 42 p. 66.


Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 63 63 26
Full Text Views 106 106 60
PDF Downloads 18 18 8
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0