Maintaining Ethnic Ties in the Process of EU Enlargement: The Relationship between Kin-Minority Laws, EU Anti-Discrimination Law and the Schengen Acquis

in International Journal on Minority and Group Rights
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Within the course of the 1990s, several European Union (EU) Member States have adopted so-called “kin-minority laws”, granting preferential entry and residence rights to their co-ethnics abroad. This paper investigates the relationship between such kin-minority legislation and the Union acquis, in particular the prohibition of nationality discrimination and the Schengen rules. It provides for a comprehensive overview of kin-minority laws in Europe, comparing their scope of application, eligibility requirements and benefits granted. We argue that in the absence of Union competence in the area of minority protection, kin-minority laws provide crucial instruments in protecting ethnic minorities. At the same time, legislation granting favourable treatment to co-ethnics may be at odds with the strict Schengen regime and the principle of non-discrimination on grounds of nationality and/or ethnic origin. Even though EU law allows for positive discrimination under certain circumstances, a strict proportionality test applies. We argue that kin-minority provisions enacted by several Member States are questionable from an EU law perspective, illustrating the challenge to allow for the protection of ethnic minorities on the basis of national law whilst ensuring the coherency of the EU legal order.

Maintaining Ethnic Ties in the Process of EU Enlargement: The Relationship between Kin-Minority Laws, EU Anti-Discrimination Law and the Schengen Acquis

in International Journal on Minority and Group Rights

Sections

References

6)

Singhsupra note 4 p. 309.

42)

2001: LXII‘A szomszédos államokban élô magyarokról’Magyar Közlöny 77Budapest 2001. július 7.

47)

G.N. Toggenburg‘The debate on European Values and the Case of Cultural Diversity’European Diversity and Autonomy Papers (EDAP) No. 1 (2004).

156)

Act 2005:XLVI on the amendment of Act 1993:LV on the Hungarian citizenship and of Act 2001:XXXIX on the entrance and sojourn of alien nationals of 14 June 2005.

157)

H. Küpper‘Double citizenship, the Home Fund Act and the Inclusion of the Cultural Nation into the Constitution: Hungary’s Steps to Protect her kin-minorities in the neighbouring countries after the status law’Working Papers on EU and Eastern Europe (Hokkaido University 2005) p. 10.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 11 11 4
Full Text Views 16 16 11
PDF Downloads 3 3 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0