The First Investigation Report of the Norwegian Finnmark Commission
In: International Journal on Minority and Group RightsSearch for other papers by Øyvind Ravna in
Current site
Google Scholar
The Alta case and the Sámi struggle for “rights to lands and waters” put political pressure on the Norwegian government to broadly explore the rights of the indigenous Sámi people to such resources. Both Norway’s ratification of the International Labour Organization (ILO) Convention No. 169 concerning Indigenous and Tribal Peoples in Independent Countries in 1990, and the 2005 Finnmark Act are results of that exploration. To meet the obligations Norway undertook by signing the ILO Convention, the Finnmark Act authorises the Finnmark Commission to investigate land rights held by Sámi and other people in the most central part of Sámi areas in Norway. In March 2012, the Commission submitted its first report, which is the first specific legal clarification of a particular area after 30 years of examinations and discussions of Sámi rights. The report is therefore met with high expectations. This article analyses the main findings of the Commission, including the interpretation of its mandate and thus also Norway’s obligations in regards to the ILO Convention. The article concludes with reflections as to whether the investigation fulfils Norway’s commitments to identify and recognise the lands of the Sámi, both under national and international law.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
5)
13 February 2013, after this manuscript was sent the editors, the Finnmark Commission filed its Report 2, Nesseby. It will not be reviewed here. However, with respect to the recognition of collective use and ownership rights, it can be mention that Report 2 has largely similar conclusions as Report 1.
-
7)
NOU 1984: 18 Om samers rettsstilling, pp. 42–44.
-
18)
Finnmarkskommisjonen, supra note 3, p. 9. The decision was done in a meeting 30 October 2008.
-
24)
Finnmarkskommisjonen, supra note 3, p. 64 with further references to NRt. Rt. 2001 p. 1229, at p. 1244.
-
25)
Finnmarkskommisjonen, supra note 3, p. 61.
-
32)
Finnmark Commission, supra note 3, p. 104.
-
34)
Finnmark Commission, supra note 3, p. 104.
-
37)
Finnmark Commission, supra note 3, p. 77.
-
44)
Finnmark Commission, supra note 3, p. 15. The date relates to the time when Finnmark Estate took over the former State land.
-
45)
Finnmark Commission, supra note 3, p. 7.
-
49)
Finnmark Commission, supra note 3, p. 15.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 706 | 147 | 32 |
| Full Text Views | 194 | 19 | 4 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 119 | 27 | 8 |
The First Investigation Report of the Norwegian Finnmark Commission
In: International Journal on Minority and Group RightsSearch for other papers by Øyvind Ravna in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
The Alta case and the Sámi struggle for “rights to lands and waters” put political pressure on the Norwegian government to broadly explore the rights of the indigenous Sámi people to such resources. Both Norway’s ratification of the International Labour Organization (ILO) Convention No. 169 concerning Indigenous and Tribal Peoples in Independent Countries in 1990, and the 2005 Finnmark Act are results of that exploration. To meet the obligations Norway undertook by signing the ILO Convention, the Finnmark Act authorises the Finnmark Commission to investigate land rights held by Sámi and other people in the most central part of Sámi areas in Norway. In March 2012, the Commission submitted its first report, which is the first specific legal clarification of a particular area after 30 years of examinations and discussions of Sámi rights. The report is therefore met with high expectations. This article analyses the main findings of the Commission, including the interpretation of its mandate and thus also Norway’s obligations in regards to the ILO Convention. The article concludes with reflections as to whether the investigation fulfils Norway’s commitments to identify and recognise the lands of the Sámi, both under national and international law.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 706 | 147 | 32 |
| Full Text Views | 194 | 19 | 4 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 119 | 27 | 8 |
