Save

Death Zones, Comfort Zones: Queering the Refugee Question

In: International Journal on Minority and Group Rights
Author:
Eddie Bruce-Jones Lecturer, Birkbeck College School of Law, University of London, London, UK, e.bruce-jones@bbk.ac.uk

Search for other papers by Eddie Bruce-Jones in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Sexuality-based refugee claims constitute an expanding area of legal practice and scholarship. This expansion in the field of refugee law mirrors international efforts to address homophobia in various sites around the globe, and in legal terms, this has predominantly taken the form of rights-based protections, such as decriminalising same-sex sexual acts as a matter of civil and political rights. The strategies of addressing sex-, gender- and sexuality-based oppression in the context of free movement on one hand and constitutional protections on the other share a common set of tensions and dilemmas, and both risk re-inscribing fundamental aspects of the very violence that they each seek to address. This article asks what it might mean to “queer” refugee law, particularly in the context of its dynamic relationship with the discourse of decriminalisation. The article takes forward the centrality of sexual politics within the moral economy of migration regulation and attempts to approach it with the methodological impulse and transformative potential that “queer” suggests.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 669 117 6
Full Text Views 710 3 0
PDF Views & Downloads 788 8 0