Interpreting fpic in undrip

In: International Journal on Minority and Group Rights
Dwight Newman University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada,

Search for other papers by Dwight Newman in
Current site
Google Scholar
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution


Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):


This article discusses the divergent interpretations of what the free, prior, and informed consent (fpic) provisions in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (undrip) mean, showing how textual and purposive interpretations end up with different positions. The article engages more broadly with the appropriate approach to interpretation of General Assembly resolutions and argues that undrip is within a particular category that are more treaty-like in character and to which principles of treaty interpretation should be applied. The application of those principles supports both divergent interpretations but calls for them to be combined in light of other interpretive factors, all of which have the potential to continue shifting over time. Within the context of undrip interpretation having received much less direct attention than it should, the article seeks to contribute to ongoing conversations on how to interpret undrip in ways that support a sustainable implementation of fpic.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1600 296 15
Full Text Views 348 69 4
PDF Views & Downloads 758 148 6