Save

Ethiopia: The Interplay Between Federalism and Dominant Party Rule and the Sidama’s Quest for Statehood

In: International Journal on Minority and Group Rights
Author:
Lovise Aalen Chr. Michelsen Institute, Bergen, Norway, lovise.aalen@cmi.no

Search for other papers by Lovise Aalen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

Political parties are particularly important for the operation of federal systems. The way parties are organised might reinforce or corrode the federal division of power. Ethiopian federalism is a case in point: although the Constitution gives wide rights of autonomy for regional states, centralised party rule has undermined the regional states’ ability to determine their own affairs. In this paper, the Sidama’s quest for regional statehood is discussed. This quest has been suppressed until recently, when a split in the ruling party led to political liberalisation and a new party leadership. The change made it possible for the Sidama to conduct a referendum for a separate regional state in 2019, resulting in a new Sidama state in 2020. A new national centre-oriented Prosperity Party may however lead to a recentralisation, showing how federal structures are vulnerable to changes in national political power.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 902 295 20
Full Text Views 56 13 1
PDF Views & Downloads 120 25 4