Save

Righting Injustices Towards the Sámi

A Critical Perspective on the Norwegian Truth and Reconciliation Commission

In: International Journal on Minority and Group Rights
Authors:
Anne Margrethe Sønneland Associate Professor, VID Specialized University, Oslo, Norway

Search for other papers by Anne Margrethe Sønneland in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Carola Lingaas Associate Professor, VID Specialized University, Oslo, Norway

Search for other papers by Carola Lingaas in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$34.95

Abstract

One of the mandates of the Norwegian Truth and Reconciliation Commission (trc) is to contribute to reconciliation between the majority population and the Sámi and Kven population. The Commission is tasked to create greater equality between the majority and minority populations as well as increasing the knowledge about the Sámi and Kven population in the majority. In this paper, we will focus on the Sámi indigenous people.

We will examine three aspects: first, the assumption that the reconciliation should be between the majority population and the Sámi population rather than between the State and the population targeted by the Norwegianisation policies. Second, how such a reconciliation between the State and the Sámi is possible when there are ongoing conflicts over the use of land and water, exemplified by the Fosen windmill case. Finally, the trc believes that a common understanding of the Norwegianisation policies and its consequences will lay the foundation for a continued reconciliation between the Sámi and the majority population. The paper discusses the involvement of the majority population in the process as well as the issues of public hearings and reparations.

By means of an interdisciplinary examination of the Norwegian trc, this paper presents sociological and legal perspectives. It draws on research from Latin American trc s, particularly the Peruvian trc, and thereby offers comparative perspectives.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 297 297 73
Full Text Views 531 531 24
PDF Views & Downloads 596 596 43