Jon Mills’ and Erik Goodwyn’s (2023) work Archetypal Origins establishes a foundation for ongoing dialogue about metaphysical origins for Jungian Psychology. This article explores tensions within their work, particularly concerning consciousness, agency, and the ontological status of matter. Examining Goodwyn’s cosmopsychism, it problematizes its treatment of matter and suggests an alternative framework. Retaining some of Goodwyn’s key themes of holism and formal cause, this variation of ontological idealism gives consciousness more primacy. The proposal suggests Universal Spirit as non-local absolute consciousness and Soul as a localized projection within the appearance of spacetime.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Baluška, F., Miller, W.B., & Reber., A.S., (2021). Biomolecular basis of cellular consciousness via subcellular nanobrains. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(5), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22052545
Block, N. (1995). On a confusion about a function of consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18(2), 227–287. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00038188
Bogart, V. (1994). Transcending the dichotomy of either “subpersonalities” or “an integrated unitary self.” Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 34(2), 82–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/00221678940342006
Bromberg, P.M. (1996). Standing in the spaces: The multiplicity of self and the psychoanalytic relationship. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 32(4). Retrieved from https://pep-web.org/browse/document/cps.032.0509a
Ceylan, M.E., Donmez, A., Unsalver, B.Ö., Evrensel, A., & Kaya Yertutanol, F.D. (2017). The soul, as an uninhibited mental activity, is reduced into consciousness by rules of quantum physics. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 51(4), 582–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-017-9395-5
Chalmers, D. (1996). Facing up to the problem of consciousness. In S.R. Hameroff, A.W. Kaszniak, & A.C. Scott (Eds.), Toward a science of consciousness: The first Tucson discussions and debates (pp. 5–28). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6860.003.0003
Corning, P.A. (2023). Teleonomy in evolution: “The ghost in the machine.” In P.A. Corning, S.A. Kauffman, D. Noble, J.A. Shapiro, R.I. Vane-Wright, & A. Pross (Eds.), Evolution “On Purpose”: Teleonomy in Living Systems (pp. 13–32). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/14642.003.0005
Del Giudice, M. (2018). Evolutionary psychopathology: A unified approach. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Fadiman, J., & Gruber, J. (2020). Your symphony of selves: Discover and understand more of who we are. Rochester, VT: Park Street Press.
Faggin, F. (2024). Irreducible: Consciousness, life, computers, and human nature. Winchester, UK: Essentia Books. Goodwyn, E. (2022). The origins of psyche: From experience to ontology. International Journal of Jungian Studies, 14(2), 127–146. doi: 10.1163/19409060-bja10016
Gagliano, M. (2020). Aware: Glimpses of consciousness. [Film]. Retrieved September, 12, 2024 from https://aware-film.com/.
Goodwyn, E. (2020). Commentary on Mills’ “The Essence of Archetypes.” International Journal of Jungian Studies, 12(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1163/19409060-01201007
Goodwyn, E. (2023a). Archetype, psyche, world: From experience to cosmopsychism. International Journal of Jungian Studies, 15(1), 32–51. https://doi.org/10.1163/19409060-bja10007
Goodwyn, E. (2023b). Psyche, world, archetype: Final thoughts. In J. Mills, & E. Goodwyn (Eds.), Archetypal ontology: New directions in analytical psychology (pp. 113–140). New York, NY: Routledge.
Hermans, H.J.M., & Hermans-Konopka, A. (2010). Dialogical self-theory: Positioning and counter-positioning in a globalizing society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hillman, J. (1975). Re-visioning psychology. New York, NY: Harper & Row. Hoffman, D.D. (2019). Case against reality: Why evolution hid the truth from our eyes. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
Hoffman, D.D., Prakash, C., & Prentner, R. (2023). Fusions of consciousness. Entropy, 25 (1), 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/e25010129
Holsapple, R.J. (2024). Psychic multiplicity and individuation: Reexamining the part–whole relationship. https://www.proquest.com/openview/cb4de640e8568e3bf3e1be1c7ec102f1/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
Jung, C.G. (1969a). Psychology and religion: West and east (R.F.C. Hull, Trans.; Vol. 11). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Jung, C.G. (1969b). The archetypes and the collective unconscious (R.F.C. Hull, Trans.; 2nd ed., Vol. 9.1). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Jung, C.G. (1970). Mysterium coniunctionis (R.F.C. Hull, Trans.; Vol. 14). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Jung, C.G., (1972). On the psychogenesis of mental disease (R.F.C. Hull, Trans.; Vol. 3). Princeton University Press.
Jung, C.G. (1975). The structure and dynamics of the psyche. (R.F.C. Hull, Trans.; Vol. 8). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Jung, C.G. (1971). Psychological types (R.F.C. Hull, Trans.; Vol. 6). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Jung, C.G. (2009). The red book: Liber novus (S. Shamdasani, Ed.). New York: Norton.
Kastrup, B., (2017). There is an ‘unconscious,’ but it may well be conscious. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 13(3), 559–572. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v13i3.1388
Kastrup, B., (2018). The universe in consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 25(5–6), 125–155. Retrieved from https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/imp/jcs/2018/00000025/f0020005/art00006
Kastrup, B. (2019). The idea of the world: A multi-disciplinary argument for the mental nature of reality. Winchester, UK: Iff Books.
Kastrup, B. (2023, October 15). The universe in consciousness [Video]. YouTube. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X4YVgM2HPMk
Kauffman, S.A. (2016). Humanity in a creative universe. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Kauffman, S. (2023). The “adjacent possible”—and how it explains human innovation [Video]. TED Conferences. Retrieved January 8, 2024, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEtATZePGmg
Kramer, B.A., Sarabia del Castillo, J., & Pelkmans, L. (2022). Multimodal perception links cellular state to decision-making in single cells. Science, 3776606, 642–648. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abf4062
Lanza, R., Pavsic, M., & Berman, B. (2021). The grand biocentric design: How life creates reality. Dallas, TX: BenBella Books.
Lester, D. (2010). A multiple self theory of personality. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
Levin, M. (2022). Technological approach to mind everywhere: An experimentally grounded framework for understanding diverse bodies and mind. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 16, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2022.841425
Mills, J. (2018a). Psychic multiplicity and individuation: Reexamining the part-whole relationship. International Journal of Jungian Studies, 10(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/19409052.2018.1503808
Mills, J. (2018b). The essence of archetypes. International Journal of Jungian Studies, 10(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/19409052.2018.1503808
Mills, J. (2021). Archetypal metaphysics and the psyworld. International Journal of Jungian Studies, 13(2), 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1163/19409060-bja10007
Mills, J., & Goodwyn, E. (Eds.). (2023). Archetypal ontology: New directions in analytical psychology. London, UK: Routledge.
Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? The Philosophical Review, 83 (4), 435–450. Retrieved 12/03/2024 from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2183914
Plato. (2002). Five dialogues: Euthyphro, Apology, Crito, Meno, Phaedo (G.M.A. Grube, Trans.; 2nd ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.
Plotinus. (2015). The complete works of Plotinus. East Sussex, UK: Delphi Classics.
Redfearn, J.W.T. (1985). My self, my many selves. London, UK: Academic Press.
Rowan, J. (1990). Subpersonalities: The people inside us. London, UK: Routledge.
Strachan, R.T., & Reid, M. (2011). Self-soul-spirit: A current working model for understanding human development. Retrieved September 12, 2024, from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zxbSsMpmW5lP3w6aHNaiC9EF5hdn4iU3/view?pli=1
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 282 | 282 | 69 |
Full Text Views | 3 | 3 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 9 | 9 | 1 |
Jon Mills’ and Erik Goodwyn’s (2023) work Archetypal Origins establishes a foundation for ongoing dialogue about metaphysical origins for Jungian Psychology. This article explores tensions within their work, particularly concerning consciousness, agency, and the ontological status of matter. Examining Goodwyn’s cosmopsychism, it problematizes its treatment of matter and suggests an alternative framework. Retaining some of Goodwyn’s key themes of holism and formal cause, this variation of ontological idealism gives consciousness more primacy. The proposal suggests Universal Spirit as non-local absolute consciousness and Soul as a localized projection within the appearance of spacetime.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 282 | 282 | 69 |
Full Text Views | 3 | 3 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 9 | 9 | 1 |