Save

Judicial Reform in China: What Do Judges Think?

In: International Journal of Procedural Law
Author:
Peter C.H. Chan null

Search for other papers by Peter C.H. Chan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Online Publication Date:
04 Nov 2023
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00
Add to Cart

Other access options

Rent on DeepDyve
Redeem Access Token

This article assesses the extent to which the objectives of the Chinese Judicial Reform in the 2010s have been achieved, using the empirical data from a questionnaire survey of 43 judges. It provides a systematic overview of the Judicial Reform in the 2010s and examines the effectiveness of the reform. It finds that although the judicial reform slightly reduced the courts’ reliance on the government for certain resources and improved the quality of adjudication of civil and commercial cases, it did not fundamentally change government interference in court proceedings in China.

Title:
Judicial Reform in China: What Do Judges Think?
Article Type:
Research Article
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1163/30504856-01302008
Language:
English
Pages:
312–330
Keywords:
judicial reform; Chinese justice; civil and commercial litigation; judicial perception of reform
In:
International Journal of Procedural Law
In:
Volume 13: Issue 2
Publisher:
Brill | Nijhoff
E-ISSN:
3050-4856
Print ISSN:
2034-5275
Subjects:
Private International Law / Conflict of Laws, International Law

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 67 67 11
Full Text Views 0 0 0
PDF Views & Downloads 0 0 0