Repertoire of traits in the sapling of a dwarf Mediterranean shrub confers withstanding the combined stress of drought and shade

In: Israel Journal of Plant Sciences

ABSTRACT

The ability to cope with combinations of stresses is crucial for the establishment and development of young plants and determines processes of population dynamics. Seedlings and saplings of Mediterranean woody species in woody ecosystems often experience both drought and shade stresses. Our study aims at understanding the effect of the combined stresses of drought and shade on young sapling survival and development. We tested three alternative hypotheses: (1) Drought decreases plant performance in shade. (2) The impact of drought is lessened in shade or shade may even ameliorate plant performance under drought. (3) Plant response to shade is independent of plant response to water availability. The first and second hypotheses imply an interaction between drought and shade, while the third implies an orthogonal impact of drought and shade. We also ask what are the functional morphological traits that are involved in tolerating shade and drought stresses. We tested the hypotheses and questions focusing on Sarcopoterium spinosum as a model species in a fully factorial container experiment with three shading levels and two levels of water availability. The results demonstrate that moderate shading (50%) ameliorates seedling performance (measured by final biomass) under dry conditions. In contrast, when water was available, shading had a monotonic negative effect on seedling performance. Conversely, shade and drought had an independent effect on biomass partitioning and under drought – allocation to roots increased, while under shade allocation to leaves increased. The dry conditions did not cause a reduction in shade tolerance, and both shade avoidance and tolerance morphology were evidenced under moderate (50%) and deep (70%) shading (stem elongation, increased leaf area). Deep rooting – a drought-avoidance trait – was similar in high and low water availability. Our overall results support the hypothesis that shade ameliorates drought stress. Moreover, S. spinosum demonstrates that woody species inhabiting water-limited ecosystems may have a repertoire of traits that allows simultaneous tolerance to both drought and shade.

  • AlonG, KadmonR. 1996. Effect of successional stages on the establishment of Quercus calliprinos in an East Mediterranean maquis. Israel J Plant Sci. 44:335–345.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BartholomeusRP, WitteJPM, van BodegomPM, van DamJC, AertsR. 2011. Climate change threatens endangered plant species by stronger and interacting water-related stresses. J Geophys Res Biogeosci. 116:G04023, doi: 04010.01029/02011jg001693.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BjorkmanO. 1981. Responses to different quantum flux densities.In: LangeOL, AragnoM., editors. Physiological plant ecology. Berlin: Springer.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BrunnerI, HerzogC, DawesMA, ArendM, SperisenC. 2015. How tree roots respond to drought. Front Plant Sci. 6:547, doi: 510.3389/fpls.2015.00547.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CanhamCD, BerkowitzAR, KellyVR, LovettGM, OllingerSV, SchnurrJ. 1996. Biomass allocation and multiple resource limitation in tree seedlings. Canadian J Forest Res. 26:1521–1530.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CastroJ, ZamoraR, HodarJA, GomezJM. 2004. Seedling establishment of a boreal tree species (Pinus sylvestris) at its southernmost distribution limit: consequences of being in a marginal Mediterranean habitat. J Ecol. 92:266–277.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ChapinFS, SchulzeED, MooneyHA. 1990. The ecology and economics of storage in plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 21:423–447.

  • ChavesMM, PereiraJS, MarocoJ, RodriguesML, RicardoCPP, OsorioML, CarvalhoI, FariaT, PinheiroC. 2002. How plants cope with water stress in the field. Photosynthesis and growth. Ann Bot London. 89:907–916.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • EvenariM, Noy MeirI, GoodallDW. 1986. Ecosystems of the world, 12B: hot desert and arid shrublands. Amsterdam, Oxford, New York & Tokyo: Elsevier.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FangYJ, XiongLZ. 2015. General mechanisms of drought response and their application in drought resistance improvement in plants. Cell Mole Life Sci. 72:673–689.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gomez-AparicioL, ZavalaMA, BonetFJ, ZamoraR. 2009. Are pine plantations valid tools for restoring Mediterranean forests? An assessment along abiotic and biotic gradients. Ecol Appl. 19:2124–2141.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GrimeJP. 1966. Shade avoidance and shade tolerance in flowering plants. In: BainbridgeRE, GC RackhamO, editor. Light as an ecological factor. Oxford: Blackwell; p. 187–207.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GrimeJP. 1979. Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Chichester, New York, Brisbane & Toronto: Wiley, 222 pp.

  • GrubbPJ. 2016. Trade-offs in interspecific comparisons in plant ecology and how plants overcome proposed constraints. Plant Ecol Diver. 9:3–33.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HenryHAL, AarssenLW. 2001. Inter- and intraspecific relationships between shade tolerance and shade avoidance in temperate trees. Oikos 93:477–487.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HolmgrenM. 2000. Combined effects of shade and drought on tulip poplar seedlings: trade-off in tolerance or facilitation? Oikos 90:67–78.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HolmgrenM, SchefferM, HustonMA. 1997. The interplay of facilitation and competition in plant communities. Ecology 78:1966–1975.

  • KingDA. 1990. The adaptive significance of tree height. Am Nat. 135:809–828.

  • KozlowskiTT, PallardySG. 2002. Acclimation and adaptive responses of woody plants to environmental stresses. Bot Rev. 68:270–334.

  • KummerowJ. 1981. Structure of roots and root systems. In: Di CastriF, GoodallDW, RaymondLS, editors. Mediterranean-type shrublands. Amsterdam, Oxford & New York: Elsevier; p. 269–288.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LinJ, HarcombePA, FultonMR, HallRW. 2002. Sapling growth and survivorship as a function of light in a mesic forest of southeast Texas, USA. Oecologia 132:428–435.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LitavM, OrshanG. 1971. Biological flora of Israel. 1. Sarcopoterium spinosum (L.) sp. Israel J Bot. 20:48–64.

  • MargarisNS. 1981. Adaptive strategies in plants dominating Mediterranean-type ecosystems. In: Di CastriF, GoodallDW, RaymondLS, editors. Mediterranean-type shrublands. Amsterdam, Oxford & New York: Elsevier; p. 309–315.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McConnaughayKDM, ColemanJS. 1999. Biomass allocation in plants: ontogeny or optimality? A test along three resource gradients. Ecology 80:2581–2593.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McDowellN, PockmanWT, AllenCD, BreshearsDD, CobbN, KolbT, PlautJ, SperryJ, WestA, WilliamsDG, YepezEA. 2008. Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought? New Phytol. 178:719–739.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MooneyHA. 1972. The carbon balance of plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 3:315–346.

  • NiinemetsU, ValladaresF. 2006. Tolerance to shade, drought, and waterlogging of temperate Northern Hemisphere trees and shrubs. Ecol Monogr. 76:521–547.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NobelPS. 1999. Physiochemical and environmental palnt physiology. 2nd ed. London: Academic Press.

  • PoorterH, NagelO. 2000. The role of biomass allocation in the growth response of plants to different levels of light, CO2, nutrients and water: a quantitative review. Aust J Plant Physiol. 27:595–607.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Reisman-BermanO. 2007. Age-related change in canopy traits shifts conspecific facilitation to interference in a semi-arid shrubland. Ecography 30:459–470.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ReyerCPO, LeuzingerS, RammigA, WolfA, BartholomeusRP, BonfanteA, de LorenziF, DuryM, GloningP, Abou JaoudeR 2013. A plant's perspective of extremes: terrestrial plant responses to changing climatic variability. Glob Change Biol. 19:75–89.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rodriguez-CalcerradaJ, CanoFJ, Valbuena-CarabanaM, GilL, ArandaI. 2010. Functional performance of oak seedlings naturally regenerated across microhabitats of distinct overstorey canopy closure. New Forest. 39:245–259.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SackL, GrubbPJ. 2002. The combined impacts of deep shade and drought on the growth and biomass allocation of shade-tolerant woody seedlings. Oecologia 131:175–185.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SmitC, den OudenJ, DiazM. 2008. Facilitation of Quercus ilex recruitment by shrubs in Mediterranean open woodlands. J Veg Sci. 19:193–200.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SmithT, HustonM. 1989. A theory of the spatial and temporal dynamics of plant communities. Vegetatio 83:49–69.

  • TilmanD. 1985. The resource-ratio hypothesis of plant succession. Am Nat. 125:827–852.

  • ValladaresF, NiinemetsU. 2008. Shade tolerance, a key plant feature of complex nature and consequences. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 39:237–257.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ZavalaMA, ZeaE. 2004. Mechanisms maintaining biodiversity in Mediterranean pine-oak forests: insights from a spatial simulation model. Plant Ecol. 171:197–207.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 36 14 1
Full Text Views 17 10 1
PDF Downloads 17 10 2