The Political Dimension of Modernity and the Unsurpassable Exteriority of ‘Nature’
In: International Journal of Social ImaginariesSearch for other papers by José Maurício Domingues in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
The environment and climate change have achieved global, imaginary and institutional, centrality. Yet, despite efforts by social movements and intellectuals to change the status of ‘nature’ in social life, its unsurpassable exteriority in relation to ‘society’ remains a defining feature of modernity. While the imaginary is to a large extent fluid, these are core elements that hardly change, and by the same token are hard to change, one of the reasons being that they are crystalized in institutions, which contributes to their recursiveness and reiteration. This article explores the reasons for this, reconstructing the modern perspective, the role of subjectivity in it and some alternative views while focusing on the political dimension of modernity. It then goes on to tackle contemporary issues. If we aim to bring about a different world, and this does not exclude recourse to different civilizational alternatives, I argue that it is mostly from within the modern imaginary and institutional framework that we must face up to present challenges. I also suggest that the concepts of collective subjectivity and materiality may contribute to a renewed understanding of these questions within a critical theory perspective.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Adorno, T W 1980 [1966], Negative Dialektik, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp.
-
Adorno, T W and Horkheimer, M 1984 [1944], Dialektik der Aufklärung, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp.
-
Arnason, J P 1989, ‘The imaginary constitution of modernity’, Revue Européenne de sciences sociales, vol. 27, no. 86, pp. 323–37.
-
Beck, U 1986, Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg eine andere Moderne, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp.
-
Bentham, J 1996 [1780], An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation: The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
-
Benton, T 1993, Natural Relations: Ecology, Animal Rights & Social Justice, London and New York, Verso.
-
Bloch, E 1961, Naturrecht und menschliche Würde, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp.
-
Callon, M 2006, ‘Sociologie de l’acteur reseaux’, in Akrich, M and Latour, B (eds), Sociologie de la traducción: textes fondateurs, Paris, Presses de Mines.
-
Cannavò, P F and Lane Jr, J H 2014, Engaging Nature: Environmentalism and the Political Theory Canon, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
-
Chakrabarty, D 2009, ‘The climate of history: Four theses’, Critical Inquiry, vol. 35, no. 20, pp. 197–222.
-
Chakrabarty, D 2015, The human condition in the Anthropocene. Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Yale University(https://tannerlectures.utah.edu/Chakrabarty%20manuscript.pdf).
-
Chengzhou, H 2018 ‘New Confucianism, science and the future of the environment’, European Review, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 368–80.
-
Chernilo, D 2013, The Natural Law Foundations of Modern Social Theory: The Quest for Certainty, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.
-
Chernilo, D 2017, ‘The question of the human in the Anthropocene debate’, European Journal of Social Theory, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 44–60.
-
Clastres, P 2013 [1977] Archéologie de la violence. La Guerre dans le societies primitives, La Tour d’Aigues, Editions de l’Aube.
-
Danowski, D and Viveiros de Castro, E 2016 [2014], The Ends of the World, Cambridge, Polity.
-
Descola, P 2005, Par-delà nature et culture, Paris, Gallimard.
-
Domingues J M 1995 Sociological Theory and Collective Subjectivity, Houndmills, Macmillan and New York, Saint Martin’s Press.
-
Domingues J M 2000 Social Creativity, Collective Subjectivity and Contemporary Modernity, Houndmills, Macmillan and New York, Saint Martin’s Press.
-
Domingues J M 2006 Reconstructing Modernity, Cardiff, University of Wales Press.
-
Domingues J M 2017/2018 Emancipation and History: The Return of Social Theory, Leiden, Brill, 2017 and Chicago, Haymarket.
-
Domingues J M 2019 Critical Theory and Political Modernity, New York, Palgrave Macmillan.
-
Dryzek, J S, Norgaard, R B and Schlosberg, D 2013, Climate Challenged Society, New York, Oxford University Press.
-
Duit, A, Feindt, P H and Meadowcroft, J M 2016, ‘Greening the Leviathan: The rise of the environmental state’, Environmental Politics, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1–23.
-
Eder, K 1996 The Social Construction of Nature: A Sociology of Ecological Enlightenment, London, Sage.
-
Eder, K 2000 Kulturelle Identität zwischen Tradition und Utopie. Soziale Bewegung als Ort gesellschaftlicher Lernprozesse in Europa, Berlin, Campus.
-
Engels, F 1975 [1925] Dialektik der Natur, in Marx, K and Engels, F, Werke, vol. 20, Berlin, Dietz.
-
Foster, J B 2000, Marx’s Ecology: Materialism and Nature, New York, Monthly Review.
-
Foucault, M 1976, Histoire de la sexualité, vol. 1. La volonté de savoir, Paris, Gallimard.
-
Foucault, M 2009, Sécurité, territoire, population. Cours au Collège de France, 1977–1978, Paris, Gallimard/Seuil.
-
Freud, S 1969 [1915]‚ ‘Das Unbewuβte’, in Gesammelte Werke, 1913–1917, vol. 10, Frankfurt am Main, Fischer.
-
Giddens, A 1990 The Consequences of Modernity, Cambridge, Polity.
-
Giddens, A 2009 The Politics of Climate Change, Cambridge, Polity.
-
Gierke, O 1900 [1868] Political Theories of the Middle Ages, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
-
Grimm, H and Wild, M 2016, Tierethik zur Einführung, Hamburg, Junius.
-
Guthrie, W K C 1971 [1969] The Sophists, Cambridge, “Cambridge University Press.
-
Habermas, J 1968 [1965] ‘Erkenntnis und Interesse’, in Technik und Wissenschaft als ‘Ideologie’, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp.
-
Habermas, J 1968, ‘Technik und Wissenschaft als “Ideologie”’, in Technik und Wissenschaft als ‘Ideologie’, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp.
-
Habermas, J 1976, Zur Rekonstruktion historischen Materialismus, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp.
-
Habermas, J 1988 [1981] Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp.
-
Habermas, J 2005, Die Zukunft der menchlichen Natur. Auf dem Weg zu einer liberalen Eugenik? Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp.
-
Hall, I 2017‘Narenda Modi and India’s normative power’, International Affairs, vol. 93, no 1, pp. 113–31.
-
Heidegger, M 1997 [1930], Vom Wesen der Wahrheit, Frankfurt am Main, Vittorio Klostermann.
-
Jonas, H 1984 Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilization, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp.
-
Kassiola, J and Guo S (eds) 2010, China’s Environmental Crisis: Domestic and Global Political Impacts and Responses, New York, Palgrave.
-
Lahsen, M 2015‘Digging deeper into the why: Cultural dimensions of climate change skepticism among scientists’, in Barnes, J and Dove, M R (eds), Climate Culture: Anthropological Perspectives on Climate Change, New Haven and London, Yale University Press.
-
Latour, B 1991, Nous n’avons jamais été modernes. Essais de anthropologie symétrique, Paris, La Découverte.
-
Latour, B 2004, Politiques de la nature. Comment faire entrer les sciences dans democratie, Paris, La Découverte.
-
Latour, B 2012, Enquête sur les modes d’existence, Paris, La Découverte.
-
Leff, E 2004, Racionalidad ambiental. La reapropiación social de la naturaleza, Mexico, Siglo XXI.
-
Lévi-Strauss, C 1980 [1949], Les Structures élémentaires de la parenté, Paris, Mouton.
-
Lovelock, J 2006, The Revenge of Gaia: Why the Earth is Fighting Back – and How We Can Still Save Humanity, London, Penguin.
-
Marcuse, H 1974 [1955], Eros and Civilization: A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud, Boston, Beacon.
-
Marcuse, H 2002 [1964], One-dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Society, London and New York, Routledge.
-
Marx, K 1981 [1844], Ökonomische-philosophische Manuskript aus dem Jahre 1844, in Marx, K and Engels, F, Werke,vol. 1, Berlin, Dietz.
-
Marx, K 1961 [1859], ‘Vorwort’, in Zur Kritik der politischen Ökonomie, in Marx, K and Engels, F, Werke, vol. 13, Berlin, Dietz.
-
Marx, K. 1962 [1867], Das Kapital. Kritik der politischen Ökonomie, vol. 1, in Marx, K and Engels, F, Werke, vol. 23, Berlin, Dietz.
-
Marx, K and Engels, F 1969 [1845], Die deutsche Ideologie, in Marx, K and Engels, F, Werke, vol. 3, Berlin, Dietz.
-
Marx, K and Engels, F 1978 [1848], Manifest der kommunistischen Partei, in Marx, K and Engels, F, Werke, vol. 4, Berlin, Dietz.
-
Mead, G H 1934, Mind, Self, and Society, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
-
Melucci, A 1996, Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
-
Meyer, J M 2001, Political Nature: Environmentalism and the Interpretation of Western Thought, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
-
Moore, J W 2014, Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital, London and New York, Verso.
-
Moscovici, S 1968, Essai sur l’histoire humaine de la nature, Paris, Flammarion.
-
Murphy, M 2011, ‘The natural law tradition in ethics’, in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (plato.stanford.edu).
-
Naess, A 1973, ‘The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement. A summary’, Inquiry, vol. 16, nos 1–4, pp. 95–100.
-
O’Connor, J 1989‘Political ecology of socialism and capitalism’, Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 11–38.
-
O’Connor, J 1991a, ‘Socialism and ecology’, Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, vol. 1, no 3, pp. 1–12.
-
O’Connor, J 1991b, ‘On the two contradictions of capitalism’, Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 107–09.
-
Parsons, T 1966, Societies: Evolutionary and Comparative Perspectives, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall.
-
Popper, K 1972 [1967] ‘Epistemology without a knowing subject’, in Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
-
Porto Gonçalves, C W 2006, A globalização da natureza e a natureza da globalização, Rio de Janeiro, Civilização Brasileira.
-
Regan, T 1983, The Case for Animal Rights, Berkeley and Los Angeles, University of California Press.
-
Saryal, R 2018, ‘Climate change policy of India: Modifying the environment’, South Asia Research, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 1–19.
-
Shapiro, J 2016, China’s Environmental Challenges, Cambridge, Polity, 2nd edition.
-
Shiva, V 2008, Soil, Not Oil: Climate Change, Peak Oil and Food Insecurity, London, Zed Books.
-
Simón Campaña, F 2013, ‘Derechos de la naturaleza: innovación trascendental, retórica jurídica o proyecto político’, Iuris Dicto, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 9–38.
-
Singer, P 2009 [1975], Animal Liberation, New York, HarperCollins.
-
Strauss, L 1969 [1953], Natural Right and History, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
-
Svampa, M 2016, Debates latinoamericanos: indianismo, desarrollo, dependencia, populismo, Buenos Aires, Edhasa.
-
Svampa, M 2019, ‘El antropoceno como diagnóstico y paradigma. Lecturas globales desde el sur’, Utopia y praxis latinoamericana, vol. 24, no. 84, pp. 33–54.
-
Toulmin, S 1992 [1990], Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
-
Vetlesen, A J 2015, The Denial of Nature, London and New York, Routledge.
-
Vetlesen, A J 2019, Cosmologies of the Anthropocene: Panpsychism, Animism, and the Limits of Posthumanism, London and New York, Routledge.
-
Viveiros de Castro, E 2009, Métaphysiques cannibales, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.
-
Wang H 2014, China from Empire to Nation-State, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
-
Weber, M 1988 [1920] ‘Taoismus und Confucianismus’, in Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie, vol. 1, Tübingen, J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
-
Whitehead, A N 1933, Science and the Modern World, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
-
Wilding, A (2008) ‘Ideas for a critical theory of nature’, Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 48–67.
-
Zaffaroni, E R 2011, ‘La naturaleza como persona: Pachamama y Gaia’, in Acosta, A and Martínez, E (eds), La naturaleza con derechos. De la filosofía a la política, Quito, Abya Yala.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 919 | 508 | 204 |
| Full Text Views | 45 | 22 | 2 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 110 | 33 | 0 |
The Political Dimension of Modernity and the Unsurpassable Exteriority of ‘Nature’
In: International Journal of Social ImaginariesSearch for other papers by José Maurício Domingues in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
The environment and climate change have achieved global, imaginary and institutional, centrality. Yet, despite efforts by social movements and intellectuals to change the status of ‘nature’ in social life, its unsurpassable exteriority in relation to ‘society’ remains a defining feature of modernity. While the imaginary is to a large extent fluid, these are core elements that hardly change, and by the same token are hard to change, one of the reasons being that they are crystalized in institutions, which contributes to their recursiveness and reiteration. This article explores the reasons for this, reconstructing the modern perspective, the role of subjectivity in it and some alternative views while focusing on the political dimension of modernity. It then goes on to tackle contemporary issues. If we aim to bring about a different world, and this does not exclude recourse to different civilizational alternatives, I argue that it is mostly from within the modern imaginary and institutional framework that we must face up to present challenges. I also suggest that the concepts of collective subjectivity and materiality may contribute to a renewed understanding of these questions within a critical theory perspective.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 919 | 508 | 204 |
| Full Text Views | 45 | 22 | 2 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 110 | 33 | 0 |