From the Phenomenology of Reactivation to the Hermeneutics of Innovation
Paul Ricœur on Sedimentation as the Dialectical Counterpart of Productive Imagination
In: International Journal of Social ImaginariesSearch for other papers by Saulius Geniusas in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
While in Husserl’s and Merleau-Ponty’s writings, the concept of sedimentation was linked to that of reactivation, Ricœur replaced the juxtaposition of these two concepts with the collocation of sedimentation and innovation. The central goal of this paper is to clarify why Ricœur replaces the phenomenological concept of reactivation with the hermeneutical concept of innovation. After explicating how reactivation was understood in Husserlian phenomenology, I show why this concept is out of place in Ricœur’s phenomenological hermeneutics. I further identify four possible ways to understand the relation between Ricœur’s hermeneutics of innovation and Husserl’s phenomenology of reactivation. Afterwards, while offering a detailed analysis of the threefold mimesis—the central theme in Ricœur’s Time and Narrative—I show that Ricœur’s concept of innovation is tied to that of productive imagination. Ricœur’s productive imagination is therefore not any kind of creatio ex nihilo. Being rooted in cultural and historical worlds, productive imagination configures and reconfigures the world against the background of sedimented prefigurations. While Husserl had offered a vertical model to understand sedimentations, and while Merleau-Ponty had replaced this model with a horizontal one, Ricœur’s model can be qualified as circular: the dialectical play of sedimentations and innovations shapes the hermeneutical circle within which the human experience of the world unfolds. This means: just as productive imagination is grounded in sedimentations, so also, sedimentations spring from productive imagination.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Carr, D. (1987). Interpreting Husserl. Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nojhoff Pub.
-
Carr, D. (1991). Time, Narrative, and History. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
-
Derrida, J. (1989). Edmund Husserl’s “Origin of Geometry.” An Introduction. Translated by J.P. Leavey. University of Nebraska Press.
-
Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and Method. Translated by J. Weinsheimer & D.G. Marshall. New York: Continuum.
-
Geniusas, S. (2023a). Paul Ricœur’s Husserlian Heresies: The Case of the Cartesian Meditations. In: D. de Santis, ed., Edmund Husserl’s The Cartesian Meditation: Commentaries, Interpretations and Discussions, Baden-Baden: Karl Alber, pp. 303-328.
-
Geniusas, S. (2023b). Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Sedimentations. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 54/2: 155-177.
-
Geniusas, S. (2024). The Origins of Sedimentation in Husserl’s Phenomenology. European Journal of Philosophy, pp. 1-17.
-
Husserl, E. (1960). Cartesian Meditations. Translated by D. Cairns. The Hague: Nijhoff.
-
Husserl, E. (1969). Formal and Transcendental Logic. Translated by D. Cairns. The Hague: Nijhoff.
-
Husserl, E. (1970). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Translated by D. Carr. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
-
Husserl, E. (1981). Philosophy as Rigorous Science. In: P. McCormick and F. Elliston, eds., Husserl: Shorter Works. Ind: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 166-198.
-
Husserl, E. (1989). Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. Second Book: Studies in the Phenomenology of Constitution. Translated by R. Rojcewicz and A. Schuwer. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
-
Husserl, E. (2001). Analyses Concerning Passive and Active Synthesis. Lectures on Transcendental Logic. Translated by A.J. Steinbock. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
-
Husserl, E. (2008). Die Lebenswelt: Auslegungen der vorgegebenen Welt und ihrer Konstitution. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1916-1937). R. Sowa, ed., Dordrecht: Springer.
-
Husserl, E. (2012). Ideas: General Introduction to Phenomenology. Translated by W.R. Boyce Gibson. London and New York: Routledge.
-
Husserl, E. (2014). Grenzprobleme der Phänomenologie: Analysen des Unbewusstseins und der Instinkte. Metaphysik. Späte Ethik. R. Sowa and T. Vongehr, eds., New York: Springer.
-
Husserl, E. (2019). First Philosophy: Lectures 1923/24 and Related Texts from the Manuscripts (1920-1925). Translated by S. Luft and T.M. Naberhaus. New York: Springer.
-
Madison, G.B. (2004). The Interpretive Turn in Phenomenology: A Philosophical History. Symposium: Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy 8: pp. 397-467.
-
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The Visible and the Invisible. Translated by A. Lingis. Evanston, Ill: Northwestern University Press.
-
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1973). The Prose of the World. Translated by J. O’Neill. Evanston, Ill: Northwestern University Press.
-
Raynova, Y. (2003). All that Gives Us to Think: Conversations with Paul Ricœur. In: A. Wiercinski, ed., Between Suspicion and Sympathy: Paul Ricœur’s Unstable Equilibrium. Toronto: The Hermeneutic Press, pp. 670-696.
-
Ricœur, P. (1976). Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning. Fort Worth: Texas Christian University Press.
-
Ricœur, P. (1990a). Time and Narrative. Vol. 1. Translated by K. Blamey and D. Pellauer. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
-
Ricœur, P. (1990b). Time and Narrative. Vol. 2. Trans. by K. Blamey and D. Pellauer. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
-
Ricœur, P. (1990c). Time and Narrative. Vol. 3. Translated by K. Blamey and D. Pellauer. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
-
Ricœur, P. (1992). Oneself as Another. Translated by K. Blamey. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
-
Ricœur, P. (1995). Intellectual Autobiography. In: L. Hahn, ed., The Philosophy of Paul Ricœur (Library of Living Philosophers, Vol. 22). Chicago: Open Court.
-
Ricœur, P. (1996). A Key to Husserl’s Ideas I. Translated by B. Harris and J.B. Spurlock. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.
-
Ricœur, P. (2008). From Text to Action: Essays in Hermeneutics, II. Translated by K. Blamey and J.B. Thompson. New York: Continuum.
-
Ricœur, P. and Castoriadis, C. (2017). Dialogue on History and Social Imaginary. Translated by S Davidson. In: S. Adams, ed., Ricœur and Castoriadis in Discussion. London and New York: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 1-20.
-
Ricœur, P. (2024). Lectures on Imagination. G.H. Taylor, R.D. Sweeney, J.-L. Amalric, and P.F. Crosby, eds., Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
-
Taylor, G. (2017). On the Cusp: Ricœur and Castoriadis at the Boundary. In: S. Adams, ed., Ricœur and Castoriadis in Discussion. London and New York: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 23-48.
-
Taylor, G. (2024). Editor’s Introduction. In: Paul Ricœur, Lectures on Imagination. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
-
Toth, T, (2003). The Graft, the Residue, and Memory: Two Conversations with Paul Ricœur. In: A. Wiercinski, ed., Between Suspicion and Sympathy: Paul Ricœur’s Unstable Equilibrium. Toronto: The Hermeneutic Press, pp. 642-669.
-
Rump, J. (2013-2014). History as Soil and Sediment: Geological Tropes of Historicity in Heidegger, Husserl, and Merleau-Ponty. Danish Yearbook of Philosophy, Vol. 48-49, pp. 139-152.
-
Steinbock, A. (1995). Home and Beyond: Generative Phenomenology after Husserl. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 399 | 339 | 64 |
| Full Text Views | 261 | 261 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 547 | 547 | 0 |
From the Phenomenology of Reactivation to the Hermeneutics of Innovation
Paul Ricœur on Sedimentation as the Dialectical Counterpart of Productive Imagination
In: International Journal of Social ImaginariesSearch for other papers by Saulius Geniusas in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
While in Husserl’s and Merleau-Ponty’s writings, the concept of sedimentation was linked to that of reactivation, Ricœur replaced the juxtaposition of these two concepts with the collocation of sedimentation and innovation. The central goal of this paper is to clarify why Ricœur replaces the phenomenological concept of reactivation with the hermeneutical concept of innovation. After explicating how reactivation was understood in Husserlian phenomenology, I show why this concept is out of place in Ricœur’s phenomenological hermeneutics. I further identify four possible ways to understand the relation between Ricœur’s hermeneutics of innovation and Husserl’s phenomenology of reactivation. Afterwards, while offering a detailed analysis of the threefold mimesis—the central theme in Ricœur’s Time and Narrative—I show that Ricœur’s concept of innovation is tied to that of productive imagination. Ricœur’s productive imagination is therefore not any kind of creatio ex nihilo. Being rooted in cultural and historical worlds, productive imagination configures and reconfigures the world against the background of sedimented prefigurations. While Husserl had offered a vertical model to understand sedimentations, and while Merleau-Ponty had replaced this model with a horizontal one, Ricœur’s model can be qualified as circular: the dialectical play of sedimentations and innovations shapes the hermeneutical circle within which the human experience of the world unfolds. This means: just as productive imagination is grounded in sedimentations, so also, sedimentations spring from productive imagination.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 399 | 339 | 64 |
| Full Text Views | 261 | 261 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 547 | 547 | 0 |