Save

Populism in East Asian Democracies: Report on the International Lecture Series of the Institute of East Asian Studies, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany (Oct 2020–Feb 2021)

In: International Journal of Taiwan Studies
Authors:
Axel Klein Professor of Japanese Politics, Institute of East Asian Studies, University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany, axel.klein@uni-due.de

Search for other papers by Axel Klein in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Frédéric Krumbein Heinrich Heine Visiting Professor, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel, frederic.krumbein@fu-berlin.de

Search for other papers by Frédéric Krumbein in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Hannes Mosler Professor of Korean Politics and Society, Institute of East Asian Studies and Institute of Political Science, University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany, hannes.mosler@uni-due.de

Search for other papers by Hannes Mosler in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

Diagnosing a gap in our knowledge on populist phenomena in East Asian democracies, especially the lack of attention paid to the region by comparative studies, the organisers of the online lecture series ‘Populism in East Asian Democracies’ (PinEAD) brought together small but substantial research on East Asia by inviting presentations by nine experts, three each on Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. Their findings showed how different phenomena and actors analysed as populists in East Asian democracies are from those in Europe or the Americas. They also highlighted how heterogeneous the group of politicians referred to as ‘East Asian populists’ is. While, on an abstract level, most East Asian populists are similar, in that they appeal to voters discontented with the democratically elected ruling parties and executives and promise to govern in a way more favourable to ‘the people’, they do so in ways that differentiate them from the standard style of political campaigning and rhetoric in their respective country.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1295 239 16
Full Text Views 131 24 1
PDF Views & Downloads 325 49 3