Sovereignty as the Axis of State-Making: the Re-sovereignisation of the Republic of China/Taiwan’s South China Sea Claim
In: International Journal of Taiwan StudiesSearch for other papers by Hui-Yi Katherine Tseng in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
This article proposes to repostulate the sovereignty-statehood complex of the Republic of China (roc/Taiwan)—namely, the dynamism between its full-fledged sovereign capability and its indeterminate statehood—by using a critical-constructivist approach. To counter legal textualism and rigidity, a three-phase approach is developed to address the under-theorisation of this issue by analysing (1) the establishment of a modern nation-state governance system, (2) identifying the national of the nation-state polity, and (3) obtaining democratic authorisation of its sovereign practice. Therefore, a state should not be considered a static edifice but an ongoing process, fraught with re-instantiations of sovereign exercises via consistent practices, through which criteria of statehood can be re-contemplated and refined. The roc/Taiwan’s South China Sea claim thus effectively demonstrates that its re-sovereignisation remains unaccomplished and has produced a stalemate that substantially impacts the roc/Taiwan’s ongoing state-making efforts.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Agence France-Presse (2012) ‘Philippines renames Coast “West Philippine Sea”’, South China Morning Post, 12 September. Retrieved 10 January 2022 from https://www.scmp.com/news/china/article/1035119/philippines-tags-coast-west-philippine-sea.
-
Agnew, John (2005) ‘Sovereignty regimes: Territoriality and state authority in contemporary world politics’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 95(2): 437–461.
-
Akashi, Kinji (2013) ‘(Re-)examination of the Eurocentric story of international law through the Japanese experience’, Proceedings of the asil Annual Meeting 107: 379–382.
-
Beckershoff, André (2017) ‘The Sunflower Movement: Origins, structures, and strategies of Taiwan’s resistance against the “black box”’, in Dafydd Fell (ed.), Taiwan’s Social Movements under Ma Ying-jeou: From the Wild Strawberries to the Sunflowers, London: Routledge, 113–133.
-
Besson, Samatha (2011) ‘Sovereignty’, in Rüdiger Wolfrum (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, secs. 17–34.
-
Biersteker, Thomas J. (2013) ‘State, sovereignty, and territory’, in Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, and Beth A. Simmons (eds), Handbook of International Relations, London: SAGE, 245–272.
-
Biersteker, Thomas J. and Weber, Cynthia (eds) (1996) State Sovereignty as Social Construct, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Boyle, Francis A. (1990) ‘The creation of the state of Palestine’, European Journal of International Law 1(1): 301–306.
-
Butcher, Charles R. and Griffiths, Ryan D. (2017) ‘Between Eurocentrism and Babel: A framework for the analysis of states, state systems, and international orders’, International Studies Quarterly 61(2): 328–336.
-
Chen, Edward I-te (1972) ‘Formosan political movements under Japanese colonial rule, 1914–1937’, Journal of Asian Studies 31(3): 477–497.
-
Chen, Hurng-yu (2009) ‘Taiwan must defend its territory’, Taipei Times, 25 May: 8. Retrieved 30 March 2021 from http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2009/05/25/2003444464.
-
Chen, Chun-i (2016) ‘Legal aspects of the roc’s position on the U-shaped line’, Prospect Journal 15(April): 1–27.
-
Chiang, Jeremy (2016) ‘Taiwan’s South China Sea dilemma’, Australian Institute of International Affairs, 18 July. Retrieved 30 March 2021 from https://www.internationalaffairs.org.au/australianoutlook/taiwans-south-china-sea-dilemma/.
-
Chiang, Huang-Chih and Hwang, Jau-Yuan (2008) ‘On the statehood of Taiwan: A legal reappraisal’, in Peter C. Y. Chow (ed.), The ‘One China’ Dilemma, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
-
Chiu, Hungdah (1992) ‘The international legal status of the Republic of China’, Occasional Papers/Reprints Series in Contemporary Asian Studies 5(112): 2–37.
-
Chung, Chieh and Lee, Chih-Te (2016) ‘八年任期中馬英九政府怎麼經營南海？’ [How did the Ma Ying-jeou administration run the South China Sea during the eight-year reign?], The Initium Media, 12 July. Retrieved 10 January 2022 from https://theinitium.com/article/20160712-taiwan-South-China-Sea/.
-
Clough, Ralph N. (1993) ‘The status of Taiwan in the new international legal order in the western Pacific’, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law) 87: 73–77.
-
Cox, Robert W. (1981) ‘Social forces, states and world orders: Beyond international relations theory’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies 10(2): 126–155.
-
Crawford, James (1990) ‘The creation of the state of Palestine: Too much too soon?’, European Journal of International Law 1(1): 307–313.
-
Crawford, James (2006) The Creation of States in International Law, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
-
Cristol, Jonathan (2019) ‘Constructivism’, Oxford Bibliographies, 30 October. Retrieved 10 January 2022 from https://doi.org/10.1093/OBO/9780199743292-0061.
-
Davidson, Donald (1963) ‘Actions, reasons, and causes’, Journal of Philosophy 60: 685–700.
-
Fan, Yun (2019) Social Movements in Taiwan’s Democratic Transition Linking Activists to the Changing Political Environment, London: Routledge.
-
Ferguson, James and Gupta, Akhil (2002) ‘Spatializing states: Toward an ethnography of neoliberal governmentality’, American Ethnologist 29(4): 981–1002.
-
Gao, Zhiguo and Jia, Bingbing (2013) ‘The nine-dash line in the South China Sea: History, status, and implications’, American Journal of International Law 107(1): 98–123.
-
Gathii, Thuo James (1999) ‘International law and Eurocentricity’, European Journal of International Law 9(1): 184–211.
-
Glassman, Jim (1999) ‘State power beyond the “territorial trap”: The internationalization of the state’, Political Geography 18(6): 669–696.
-
Government Information Office, roc/Taiwan (1993) ‘The Republic of China’s sovereignty over the Spratly Islands’, Reference: roc on Taiwan (30 April): 2.
-
Hammer, Leonard (2020) ‘Taiwan and Itu Aba (Taiping): Creating an “Island for All” in the South China Sea’, International Journal of Taiwan Studies 3(1): 93–111.
-
He, Bao-gang (2001) ‘The national identity problem and democratization: Rustow’s theory of sequence’, Government and Opposition 36(1): 97–119.
-
Hickey, Dennis V. (2018) ‘Continuity and change: Ma Ying-Jeou, Tsai Ing-Wen and the dispute in the South China Sea’, Journal of Territorial and Maritime Studies 5(1): 64–82.
-
Ho, Ming-sho (2019) Challenging Beijing’s Mandate of Heaven: Taiwan’s Sunflower Movement and Hong Kong’s Umbrella Movement, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
-
Hobson, John M. and Sharman, Jason C. (2005) ‘The enduring place of hierarchy in world politics: Tracing the social logics of hierarchy and political change’, European Journal of International Relations 11(1): 63–98.
-
Hsiao, Anne Hsiu-an and Lin, Cheng-yi (2016) ‘Taiwan’s evolving policy towards the South China Sea dispute, 1992–2016’, in Ian Storey and Cheng-yi Lin (eds), The South China Sea Dispute: Navigating Diplomatic and Strategic Tensions, Singapore: ISEAS—Yusof Ishak Institute, 74–103.
-
Huth, Paul K (2000) ‘Why are territorial disputes between states a central cause of international conflict?’, in John A. Vasquez (ed.), What Do We Know about War?, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
-
Jacobs, Bruce J. (2013) ‘Whither Taiwanization? The colonization, democratization and Taiwanization of Taiwan’, Japanese Journal of Political Science 14(4): 567–586.
-
Jin, Guan-tao; Liu, Qing-feng; and Chiu, Wei-yun (2019) ‘中國現代主權觀念形成的數位人文研究’ [The formation of the concept of sovereignty in modern terms in China: A digital humanity study], The 21st Century Bimonthly 172: 49–67.
-
Katzenstein, Peter J.; Keohane, Robert O.; and Krasner, Stephen D. (1998) ‘International organization and the study of world politics’, International Organization 52(4): 645–685.
-
Katzenstein, Peter J.; Keohane, Robert O.; and Krasner, Stephen D. (eds) (1999) Exploration and Contestation in the Study of World Politics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
-
Kobayashi, Shigeru (2012) ‘Japanese mapping of Asia-Pacific areas, 1873–1945: An overview’, Cross-Currents: East Asian History and Culture Review 2. Retrieved 30 March 2021 from https://cross-currents.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/e-journal/articles/kobayashi_shigeru.pdf.
-
Krasner Stephen D. (1999) Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
-
Kuok, Lynn (2015a) ‘Tides of change: Taiwan’s evolving position in the South China Sea’, Brookings Institution Report, 7 May. Retrieved 30 March 2021 from https://www.brookings.edu/research/tides-of-change-taiwans-evolving-position-in-the-south-china-sea/.
-
Kuok, Lynn (2015b) ‘Taiwan and the South China Sea: More steps in the right direction’, Brookings Institution Report, 24 August. Retrieved 30 March 2021 from https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/taiwan-and-the-south-china-sea-more-steps-in-the-right-direction/.
-
Kymlicka, Will (1995) Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Kymlicka, Will (2012) ‘Multiculturalism: Success, failure and the future’, Migration Policy Institute. Retrieved 30 March 2021 from www.migrationpolicy.org/research/TCM-multiculturalism-success-failure.
-
Kymlicka, Will and Banting, Keith (2006) ‘Immigration, multiculturalism and welfare state’, Ethics & International Affairs 20(3): 281–304.
-
Lee, Jinming and Li, Dexia (2003) ‘The dotted line on the Chinese pap of the South China Sea: A note’, Ocean Development and International Law Journal 34(3–4): 287–295.
-
Liao, Ping-hui and Wang, David Der-wei (2006) Taiwan under Japanese Colonial Rule 1895–1945, History, Culture, Memory, New York: Columbia University Press.
-
Lin, Cheng-yi (2008) ‘Taiwan’s Spratly Initiative in the South China Sea’, China Brief 8(4). Retrieved 30 March 2021 from https://jamestown.org/program/taiwans-spratly-initiative-in-the-south-china-sea/.
-
Linklater, Andrew (2001) ‘The changing contours of critical international relations theory’, in Richard Wyn-Jones (ed.), Critical Theory and World Politics, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 23–43.
-
Linz, Juan J. and Stepan, Alfred (1996) ‘Toward consolidated democracies’, Journal of Democracy 7(2): 14–33.
-
Liu, Kwang-Ching and Smith, Richard J. (1980) ‘The military challenge: The north-west and the coast’, in John K. Fairbank and Kwang-Ching Liu (eds), The Cambridge History of China: Late China (1800–1911), vol. 11, part 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 202–273.
-
Mackin-Solomon, Ashley (2020) ‘Tales from the uss Frank Knox: La Jollan embarks on story-collecting project’, La Jolla Light, 3 November. Retrieved 30 March 2021 from https://www.lajollalight.com/news/story/2020-11-03/tales-from-the-uss-frank-knox-la-jollan-embarks-on-story-collecting-project.
-
Mainwaring, Scott and Bizzarro, Fernando (2019) ‘The fates of Third-Wave democracies’, Journal of Democracy 30(1): 99–113.
-
Martineau, Anne-Charlotte (2014) ‘Overcoming Eurocentrism? Global history and the Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law’, European Journal of International Law 25(1): 329–336.
-
Matsuda, Hiroko (2016) ‘Japanese “New Imperial History” in comparative perspective: The cases of Okinawan and Taiwanese migrations’, Journal of History for the Public 13: 194–199.
-
Mattern, Janice Bially and Zarakol, Ayşe (2016) ‘Hierarchies in world politics’, International Organization 70(3): 623–654.
-
McCormack, Gavan (2012) ‘Yonaguni: Dilemmas of a frontier island in the East China Sea’, The Asia-Pacific Journal 10(40). Retrieved 30 March 2021 from https://apjjf.org/-Gavan-McCormack/3837/article.pdf.
-
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, roc/Taiwan (2021) ‘外交部歷年來就南海爭議問題之聲明一覽表’ [The list of statements of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of China on the South China Sea issues], Archives of Position Paper and Statement of the Government. Retrieved 30 March 2021 from https://www.mofa.gov.tw/News.aspx?n=751&sms=211&page=2&PageSize=20.
-
Ministry of the Interior, roc/Taiwan (2015) Compilation of Historical Archives on the Southern Territories of the Republic of China, Taipei: Ministry of the Interior.
-
Montevideo Convention on Rights and Duties of States (The Montevideo Convention) (1933) 49 Stat. 3097, 3100, 165 L.N.T.S., 17. 26 December.
-
Murphy, Alexander B. (1990) ‘Historical justifications for territorial claims’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 80(4): 531–548.
-
Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood (1989) World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations, Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
-
Permanent Court of Arbitration (2016) The South China Sea Arbitration (The Republic of Philippines v. The People’s Republic of China), 2013–2019. Award of 12 July (30 March 2021). Retrieved 10 January 2022 from https://pca-cpa.org/en/cases/7/.
-
Phillips, Andrew and Sharman, Jason C. (2015) International Order in Diversity: War, Trade and Rule in the Indian Ocean, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Philpott, Daniel (2016) ‘Sovereignty’, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 30 March 2021 from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/sovereignty/.
-
Price, Richard and Reus-Smit, Christian (1998) ‘Dangerous liaisons?: Critical international theory and constructivism’, European Journal of International Relations 4(3): 259–294.
-
Rengger, Nicholas John and Thirkell-White, Tristram Benedict (2007) ‘Critical international theory after 25 Years’, Review of International Studies 33: 3–74.
-
Rickards, Jane (2016) ‘South China Sea: Taiwan between a rock and a hard place’, Taiwan Business topics, 29 September. Retrieved 11 February 2023 from https://topics.amcham.com.tw/2016/09/south-china-sea-taiwan-between-a-rock-and-a-hard-place/.
-
roc/Taiwan Kaohsiung District Court (2011) ‘History’, Taiwan Kaohsiung District Court, 15 October. Retrieved 30 March 2021 from https://web.archive.org/web/20111015160854/https://ksd.judicial.gov.tw/english/index.html.
-
Ruggie, John Gerard (1993) ‘Territoriality and beyond: Problematizing modernity in international relations’, International Organization 47(1): 139–174.
-
Ruggie, John (1998) Constructing the World Polity, New York: Taylor and Francis.
-
Rustow, Dankwart Alexander (1970) ‘Transitions to democracy: Toward a dynamic model’, Comparative Politics 2(3): 337–363.
-
Sands, Gary (2019) ‘Rethinking Taiwan’s claims in the South China Sea’, The Diplomat, 28 June. Retrieved 10 March 2021 from https://thediplomat.com/2019/06/rethinking-taiwans-claims-in-the-south-china-sea/.
-
Sharman, Jason C. (2013) ‘International hierarchies and contemporary imperial governance: A tale of three kingdoms’, European Journal of International Relations 19(2): 189–207.
-
Shepherd, John Robert (1993) Statecraft and Political Economy on the Taiwan Frontier, 1600–1800, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
-
Simon, Wilson O. (2011) ‘Centre-periphery relationship in the understanding of development of internal colonies’, International Journal of Economic Development Research and Investment 2(1): 147–156.
-
Smith, Steve (2000) ‘Wendt’s world’, Review of International Studies 26(1): 151–163.
-
Song, Yann-huei (2017) ‘U.S. practice regarding Article 121(3) of unclos and the South China Sea Arbitration Case’, Chinese (Taiwan) Yearbook of International Law and Affairs 33: 21–61.
-
Taiwan Today (2016) ‘President Tsai states as unacceptable South China Sea award’, 22 July. Retrieved 10 January 2022 from https://taiwantoday.tw/news.php?unit=2,6,10,15,18&post=3936.
-
Tsai, Caroline Hui-yu (2009) Taiwan in Japan’s Empire-building: An Institutional Approach to Colonial Engineering, London: Routledge.
-
Tsai, Chi-Ting (2016) ‘Has Taiwan implicitly clarified the meaning of the U-shaped line?’, Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative and the Center for Strategic and International Studies, 6 May. Retrieved 10 January 2022 from https://amti.csis.org/taiwan-implicitly-clarified-u-shaped-line/.
-
Tzeng, Albert (2020) ‘從太陽花到2020年大選: 時代結構，政治軸綫與民粹起落’ [From Sunflower Movement to 2020 presidential election: The macro-context, axis of political reform and vicissitude of populism], The 21st Century Bimonthly 177: 4–17.
-
Vasquez, John A. and Henehan, Marie T (2001) ‘Territorial disputes and the probability of war, 1816–1992’, Journal of Peace Research 38(2): 123–138.
-
Wallerstein, Immanuel (1974) The Modern World-System, New York: Vintage Books.
-
Wang, Kuan-hsiung (2010) ‘The roc’s maritime claims and practices with special reference to the South China Sea’, Ocean Development and International Law Journal 41(3): 237–252.
-
Wang, Kuan-hsiung (2015) ‘Peaceful settlement of disputes in the South China Sea through fisheries resources cooperation and management’, Maryland Series in Contemporary Asian Studies (3): 1–42.
-
Wendt, Alexander (1994) ‘Collective identity formation and the international state’, American Political Science Review 88(2): 384–396.
-
Wight, Colin (2002) ‘Philosophy of social science and international relations’, in Water Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, and Beth A. Simmons (eds), Handbook of International Relations, London: SAGE Publications, 23–51.
-
Williams, Marc (1996) ‘Rethinking sovereignty’, in Eleanor Kofman and Gillian Youngs (eds), Globalization: Theory and Practice, London: Pinter, 109–122.
-
Wu, Naiteh (2014) ‘台灣民主化的特徵’ [The particularities of Taiwan’s democratic transition], Router: A Journal of Cultural Studies 18: 227–234.
-
Wu, Shang-su (2016) ‘Taiwan’s South China Sea Dilemma’, The Diplomat, 12 February. Retrieved 30 March 2021 from https://thediplomat.com/2016/02/taiwans-south-china-sea-dilemma/.
-
Xie, Jiazhen (2014) ‘首次南海史料展 檔案照片珍貴’ [Taiwan hold first exhibition on South China Sea documents], Central News Agency, 1 September. Retrieved 30 March 2021 from https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20140901004024-260407?chdtv.
-
Yang, Bichuan (1997) 臺灣歷史詞典 [Taiwan Historical Dictionary], Taipei: Qianwei.
-
Zou, Keyuan and Liu, Xinchang (2015) ‘The legal status of the U-shaped line in the South China Sea and its legal implications for sovereignty, sovereign rights and maritime jurisdiction’, Chinese Journal of International Law 14(1): 57–77.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 111 | 111 | 17 |
| Full Text Views | 10 | 10 | 3 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 18 | 18 | 2 |
Sovereignty as the Axis of State-Making: the Re-sovereignisation of the Republic of China/Taiwan’s South China Sea Claim
In: International Journal of Taiwan StudiesSearch for other papers by Hui-Yi Katherine Tseng in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
This article proposes to repostulate the sovereignty-statehood complex of the Republic of China (roc/Taiwan)—namely, the dynamism between its full-fledged sovereign capability and its indeterminate statehood—by using a critical-constructivist approach. To counter legal textualism and rigidity, a three-phase approach is developed to address the under-theorisation of this issue by analysing (1) the establishment of a modern nation-state governance system, (2) identifying the national of the nation-state polity, and (3) obtaining democratic authorisation of its sovereign practice. Therefore, a state should not be considered a static edifice but an ongoing process, fraught with re-instantiations of sovereign exercises via consistent practices, through which criteria of statehood can be re-contemplated and refined. The roc/Taiwan’s South China Sea claim thus effectively demonstrates that its re-sovereignisation remains unaccomplished and has produced a stalemate that substantially impacts the roc/Taiwan’s ongoing state-making efforts.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 111 | 111 | 17 |
| Full Text Views | 10 | 10 | 3 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 18 | 18 | 2 |