Gender and Legal Authority: An Examination of Early Juristic Opposition to Women's Hadīth Transmission
In: Islamic Law and SocietySearch for other papers by Asma Sayeed in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
This article analyzes two cases of early juristic opposition to the legal authority of hadīth narrated by women. These cases appear as striking anomalies for two reasons: first, jurists broadly agreed that the gender of narrators in a chain of transmission was not a criterion in evaluating hadīth; and second, the cases involve female Companions of the Prophet whose value as transmitters came to be universally acknowledged by Muslim scholars of the classical period. In this article, I demonstrate that these incidents of gender-based disparagement are more useful because of what they reveal about the development of hadīth transmission (riwāya) and legal testimony (shahāda) as technical categories rather than for what they can tell us about normative gender discourse in early and classical Islam. I also contextualize the cases in terms of early methodological debates on the legal authority of isolated reports (khabar al-wāhid, akhbār al-ahād).
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 633 | 265 | 17 |
| Full Text Views | 163 | 3 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 144 | 5 | 0 |
Gender and Legal Authority: An Examination of Early Juristic Opposition to Women's Hadīth Transmission
In: Islamic Law and SocietySearch for other papers by Asma Sayeed in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
This article analyzes two cases of early juristic opposition to the legal authority of hadīth narrated by women. These cases appear as striking anomalies for two reasons: first, jurists broadly agreed that the gender of narrators in a chain of transmission was not a criterion in evaluating hadīth; and second, the cases involve female Companions of the Prophet whose value as transmitters came to be universally acknowledged by Muslim scholars of the classical period. In this article, I demonstrate that these incidents of gender-based disparagement are more useful because of what they reveal about the development of hadīth transmission (riwāya) and legal testimony (shahāda) as technical categories rather than for what they can tell us about normative gender discourse in early and classical Islam. I also contextualize the cases in terms of early methodological debates on the legal authority of isolated reports (khabar al-wāhid, akhbār al-ahād).
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 633 | 265 | 17 |
| Full Text Views | 163 | 3 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 144 | 5 | 0 |
