Taxing Citizens: Socio-legal Constructions of Late Antique Muslim Identity


in Islamic Law and Society
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

The regulations pertaining to Islamic charity taxation illuminate underappreciated dimensions of how Muslims defined identity boundaries in late antiquity. To demarcate the contours of a historical process of Muslim identity construction, I analyze Islamic jurisprudential debates about who is and who is not obligated to pay the charity tax. Most late antique and medieval jurists made the charity tax incumbent on minors or others lacking full legal capacity, even though these groups were exempt from “for-thedivine” practices. I suggest Muslim citizenship as a framework for understanding late antique Muslim identity. Because charity tax liability had socio-political and economic implications, it functioned simultaneously as a gate into and out of a Muslim community. This article contributes to the discourse on Islamic beginnings by exploring the intricacies of Muslim self-conceptions in late antiquity.


Taxing Citizens: Socio-legal Constructions of Late Antique Muslim Identity


in Islamic Law and Society

Sections

References

  • 4

     Talal AsadGenealogies of religion (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press1993) 54.

  • 22

     M.M. Bravmann“The surplus of property: an early Arab social concept,” Der Islam 38 (1962). See also Michael Bonner “Poverty and economics in the Qur’an” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 35 no. 3 (2005): 403. Limited material resources and semi-sedentary lifestyles in ancient Arabia probably made the accumulation of wealth extremely difficult. In the absence of concrete evidence I want to resist assuming a stereotype of Arabian society as relatively more egalitarian than other societies.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

     Wael B. HallaqSharīʿa: theory practice transformations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2009) 32 (citing Beeston’s “Religions of pre-Islamic Yemen”).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

     Sijpesteijn“Shaping a Muslim state” 159–60.

  • 67

     Qalʿah’jīʿAlī ibn Abī Ṭālib293–4.

  • 70

     Qalʿah’jīʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿUmar387–8.

  • 80

     Qalʿah’jīʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿAbbās367. See also Saḥnūn al-Mudawwanah 1:306–7 (Mālikī).

  • 84

     Ibn RushdDistinguished Jurist’s Primer1:284.

  • 88

     Elizabeth F. CohenSemi-citizenship in democratic politics (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press2009) 14.

  • 94

     ShoufaniAl-Riddah152.

  • 103

     Ziauddin Ahmed“Aḥmad B. Ḥanbal and the problems of ʾĪmān,” Islamic Studies 12 no. 4 (1973).

  • 104

     Khalil ʿAthamina“The early Murjiʾa: some notes,” Journal of Semitic Studies 35 no. 1 (1990). Madelung Religious schools and sects in medieval Islam 483.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 122

     ʿAbdūal-Wāfī fī aḥkām al-zakāh49–52.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 87 87 6
Full Text Views 179 179 2
PDF Downloads 20 20 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0