Khulʿ Divorce in the Netherlands: Dutch Muslim Women Seeking Religious Divorce

in Islamic Law and Society
No Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

In this article, the author examines the ways in which a number of Dutch Muslim women try to obtain an Islamic divorce. The road to a divorce, often long and winding, does not always lead to a satisfactory conclusion. I explore the question of why it can be difficult for Muslim women to obtain a religious divorce. Drawing on recent empirical research into the phenomenon of ‘marital captivity’ – a situation in which someone is unable to terminate a (religious) marriage, I examine the case of a Dutch Muslim woman who, at the instigation of a civil court, managed to negotiate a khulʿ agreement with her ‘ex’-husband, who released her from the marital bond. This exceptional example of a khulʿ practice in the Netherlands attests to the versatility of this under-researched form of Islamic divorce and how it is used in a Muslim minority context in Europe.

Khulʿ Divorce in the Netherlands: Dutch Muslim Women Seeking Religious Divorce

in Islamic Law and Society

Sections

References

27

AliShaheen Sardar. 2013. Authority and Authenticity: Sharia Councils, Muslim Women’s Rights, and the English Courts. Child and Family Law Quarterly 25 (2): 113-137.

28

BakkerL.G.H.et al. 2010. Sharia in Nederland: Een Studie naar Islamitische Advisering en Geschilbeslechting bij Moslims in Nederland. Nijmegen: WODC/Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen.

29

BowenJohn. 2016. On British Islam. Religion Law and Everyday Practice in Shari‘a Councils. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

30

CaeiroAlexandre. 2011. The Making of the Fatwa. The Production of Islamic Legal Expertise in Europe. Archives de sciences sociales des religions 155 (juillet-septembre 2011): 81-100. Available online at: <https://www.assr.revues.org/23312> accessed 7 August 2017.

31

De BloisMatthijs. 2011. Jewish Family Law and Secular Legal Orders: The Example of the Get Refusal. In The Place of Religion in Family Law: A Comparative Search edited by Jane Mair and Esin Örücü pp. 207-27 Cambridge: Intersentia.

32

EinhornTalia. 2000. Jewish Divorce in the International Arena. In Private Law in the International Arena – Liber Amicorum Kurt Siehr edited by J. Basedow et al. pp. 135-53 The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press.

33

European Council for Fatwa and Research. 2008. Fatwa (17) Resolution 3/5, ‘Ruling on a divorce issued [sic!] a non-Muslim Judge. In Anas Osama Altikriti and Mohammed Adam Howard (ed.) Resolutions and Fatwas Second Collection trans. Shakir Nasif Al-Ubaydi and Anas Osama Altikriti (n.d. n.p.). [No longer available online; a copy is in the possession of the author]

34

FournierP.P. McDougall and M. Lichtsztral. 2012. Secular Rights and Religious Wrongs? Family Law, Religion and Women in Israel. William & Mary Journal of Women and the Law 18 (2): 333-362.

35

KruinigerPauline. 2015. Islamic Divorces in Europe: Bridging the Gap between European and Islamic Legal Orders. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing.

36

KruinigerPauline. 2016a. De seculiere rechtsstaat en religieuze aangelegenheden. Nederlands Juristenblad 20: 1429-1432.

37

KruinigerPauline and Gerrit van Maanen. 2016b. Jewish and Muslim women in marital captivity: the tort action as a solution? In Grootboek Liber Amicorum prof. mr. Gerard-René de Groot edited by Olivier Vonket al.Deventer: Wolters Kluwer.pp. 241-261.

38

LiversageAnika. 2012. Muslim Divorces in Denmark. Findings from an Empirical Investigation. In Interpreting Divorce Laws in Islam edited by Rubya Mehdiet al.Copenhagen: Djøf Publishing.pp. 179-201.

39

MacfarlaneJulie. 2012. Islamic Divorce in North America: A Shari’a Path in a Secular Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

40

MoorsAnnelies. 2013. Unregistered Islamic Marriages: Anxieties About Sexuality and Islam in the Netherlands. In Applying Sharia in the West. Facts Fears and the Future of Islamic Rules on Family Relations in the West edited by Maurits S. BergerLeiden: Leiden University Press. pp. 141-164.

41

Nationaal Coördinator Terrorismebestrijding (NCTb). 2006. Informele Islamitische Huwelijken. Het Verschijnsel en de Veiligheidsrisico’s. The Hague: NCTb.

42

PearlDavid and Werner Menski. 1998. Muslim Family Law. London: Sweet & Maxwell.

43

RuttenSusan. 2008. Het Recht van de Gescheiden Vrouw om Verlost te Worden uit het Huwelijk. NJCM-Bulletin 33 (6): 755-769.

44

RuttenSusan. 2010. Protection of Spouses in Informal Marriages by Human Rights. Utrecht Law Review 6 (2): 77-92.

45

RuttenSusanEsther van EijkLisanne DrostKhadija Kadrouch-OutmanyEliane Smits van Waesberge. 2015. Gewoon Getrouwd. Een Onderzoek naar Kindhuwelijken en Religieuze Huwelijken in Nederland (Research report on child marriages and religious marriages commissioned by the Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment) Maastricht: Maastricht University. .

46

ShmueliBenjamin. 2013. Tort Actions for Acts that are Valid according to Religious Family Law but Harm Women’s Rights: Legal Pluralism in Cases of Collision between Two Sets of Law, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 46: 823-897.

47

SchmeetsHans and Carly van Mensvoort. 2015. Religieuze Betrokkenheid van Bevolkingsgroepen 2010–2014. Den Haag: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek.

48

Smits van WaesbergheElianeIris SportelLisanne DrostEsther van EijkElja Diepenbrock. 2014. Zo zijn we niet getrouwd. Een onderzoek naar omvang en aard van huwelijksdwang achterlating en huwelijkse gevangenschap (Research report on forced marriages abandonment and marital captivity commissioned by the Ministery of Social Affairs and Employment) Utrecht: Verwey Jonker Instituut. .

49

SonneveldNadia. 2012. Khulʿ Divorce in Egypt. Public Debates Judicial Practices and Everyday Life. Cairo and New York: American University in Cairo Press and Oxford University Press.

50

SpalterNaomi. 2007. Gevangen in het Huwelijk, Tijdschrift voor Familie- en Jeugdrecht 15: 37-42.

51

SportelIris. 2016. Divorce in Transnational Families: Marriage Migration and Family Law. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 106 106 39
Full Text Views 47 47 14
PDF Downloads 10 10 4
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0