Khul‘ over the longue durée: the decline of traditional fiqh-based divorce mechanisms in Indonesian legal practice

in Islamic Law and Society
No Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

In this essay, I describe the historical development of three traditional fiqh-baseddivorce mechanisms in Indonesia that commonly result in a khul‘ divorce: regular khul‘ (khuluk), conditional divorce(taklik talak), and marital discord (syiqaq). In the practice of present-day Islamic courts these traditional fiqh-based divorce mechanisms have lost almost all of their former prominence. Through a historical analysis of legal practices offemale-initiated divorce, I will explain how this happened. Legal reforms under the 1974 Marriage Law, their adoption into the 1991 Compilation of Islamic Law, and case law of the Supreme Court broadened women’s divorce rights significantly. The same reforms made out-of-court divorce illegal. In contrast to fiqh-baseddivorce mechanisms, judicial divorce on the grounds of ‘continuous and irreconcilable marital discord’ does not require the consent of the husband or the payment of compensation and has therefore become an easier and cheaper option for Indonesian women.

Khul‘ over the longue durée: the decline of traditional fiqh-based divorce mechanisms in Indonesian legal practice

in Islamic Law and Society

Sections

References

40

Bibliography

41

As-SubkiA.Y. 2010. Fiqh Keluarga: Pedoman Berkeluarga dalam Islam. Jakarta: AMZAH.

42

BergL.W.C. van den. 1892. De afwijkingen van het Mohammedaansche familie- en erfrecht op Java en Madoera. Bijdragen tot de Taal- Land- en Volkenkunde van Nederlandsch-Indië41 (1): 454-512.

43

BergL.W.C. van den. 1882. De Mohammedaansche geestelijkheid en de geestelijke goederen op Java en Madoera. Tijdschrift voor Indische Land -en Volkenkunde uitgegeven door het Bataviaasch Genootschap van Kunsten en Wetenschappen27: 1-46.

44

BlackburnS. 2004. Women and the State in Indonesia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

45

BowenJ.R. 2003. Islam law and equality in Indonesia: An anthropology of public reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

46

BruinessenM. van. 1995. Shari’a court, tarekat and pesantren: Religious institutions in the Banten sultanate. Archipel: Études Interdisciplinaires Sur Le Monde Insulindien 50: 165-200.

47

CammackM.E. 2007. The Indonesian Islamic judiciary. In Feener M. & CammackM.E. (eds.). Islamic law in contemporary Indonesia: Ideas and institutions. Cambridge: Harvard University Press146-169.

48

CammackM.E. 1997. Indonesia’s 1989 Religious Judicature Act: Islamization of Indonesia or Indonesianization of Islam? Indonesia63: 143-168.

49

CammackM.E. 1989. Islamic Law in Indonesia’s New Order. International and Comparative Law Quarterly38 (1): 53-73.

50

CammackM.E.Bedner A.W. & HuisS.C. van. 2015. Democracy, Human Rights, and Islamic Family Law in Post-Soeharto Indonesia. New Middle Eastern Studies5.

51

CammackM.E.DonovanH. & HeatonT.B. 2007. Islamic Divorce Law and Practice in Indonesia. In FeenerM. & CammackM.E. (eds.). Islamic law in contemporary Indonesia: Ideas and institutions. Cambridge: Harvard University Press99-127.

52

DrewesG.W.J. 1968. New light on the coming of Islam to Indonesia. Bijdragen Tot De Taal- Land- En Volkenkunde. 124 (4): 433-459.

53

HakN.A.SohR.C.IbrahimN. & NiringjueraeM. 2012. Right of women to obtain divorce under Shari’ah and Islamic family law of Malaysia: With special reference to ta’liq and khulu. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 6 (11): 286-293.

54

HansteinT. 2002. Islamisches Recht und nationales Recht: Eine Untersuchung zum Einfluß des islamischen Rechts auf die Entwicklung des modernen Familienrechts am Beispiel Indonesiens. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

55

HuisS.C. van. 2015. Islamic courts and women’s divorce rights in Indonesia. The cases of Cianjur and Bulukumba. Leiden University [Published dissertation].

56

KatzJ.S. & KatzR.S. 1975. The New Indonesian Marriage Law: A mirror of Indonesia’s political, cultural, and legal systems. American Journal of Comparative Law 23 (4): 653-681.

57

KatzJ.S. & KatzR.S. 1978. Legislating social change in a developing country: The new Indonesian marriage law revisited. American Journal of Comparative Law26: 309-320.

58

KernR.A. 1935. Djandji Dalem. Bijdragen Tot De Taal- Land- En Volkenkunde 92 (1): 471-475.

59

LaffanM.F. 2011. The makings of Indonesian Islam: orientalism and the narration of a Sufi past. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

60

LaffanM.F. 2003. Islamic nationhood and colonial Indonesia: The umma below the winds. London: RoutledgeCurzon.

61

LiddleR.W. 1996. The Islamic Turn in Indonesia: A Political Explanation. The Journal of Asian Studies. 55 (3): 613-634.

62

LevD.S. 1972. Islamic courts in Indonesia: A study in the political bases of legal institutions. Berkeley: University of California Press.

63

MartynE. 2005. The Women’s Movement in Postcolonial Indonesia: Gender and Nation in a New Democracy. New York: Routledge.

64

NakamuraH. 2006. Conditional divorce in Indonesia. Cambridge: Islamic Legal Studies Program, Harvard Law School.

65

NakamuraH. 1983. Divorce in Java: A study of the dissolution of marriage among Javanese Muslims. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

66

NasirMohamad Abdun. 2011. Islamic Law and Social Change: The Religious Court and the Dissolution of Marriage among Muslims in Lombok Indonesia. Emory University (dissertation).

67

NurlaelawatiE. 2010. Modernization tradition and identity: The Kompilasi Hukum Islam and legal practice in the Indonesian religious courts. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

68

NyazeeImran Ahsan Khan. 2000. Islamic jurisprudence: Uṣūl al-Fiqh. Islamabad: International Institute of Islamic Thought.

69

O’ShaughnessyK. 2009. Gender state and social power in contemporary Indonesia: Divorce and marriage law. London: Routledge.

70

OttoJ.M. & PompeS. 1988. Islamitisch recht in Indonesië: ‘inlijsting’ van de sharia in het huidige nationale huwelijksrecht. Recht van de Islam6: 9-23.

71

Prins J. 1951. Adat law and Muslim religious law in modern Indonesia: An introduction. The World of Islam 1(4): 283-300.

72

RicklefsM.C. 2001. A history of modern Indonesia since c. 1200. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

73

Ṣaḥeeḥ International. 2004. The Qur’an: English meanings. London: Al-Muntada Al-Islami.

74

Snouck HurgronjeC. 1924. Verspreide geschriften. Bonn; Leipzig: Schroeder.

75

Snouck HurgronjeC. 1906. The acehnese. Translated by A.W.S. O’Sullivan. Leiden: E.J. Brill.

76

SyarifuddinA. 2006. Hukum perkawinan Islam di Indonesia: Antara fiqh munakahat dan Undang-Undang Perkawinan. Jakarta: Kencana.

77

YakinAyang Utriza. 2015. The Register of the Qadi Court “Kiyahi Pĕqih Najmuddin” of the Sultanate of Banten 1754-1756. Studia Islamika. 22 (3): 443-486.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 69 69 32
Full Text Views 18 18 13
PDF Downloads 10 10 5
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0