Hidden in the Margins: Contesting Legal Authority in Marginal Hadith Glosses
In: Islamic Law and SocietySearch for other papers by Muntasir Zaman in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
In the twentieth century, India witnessed a significant and ambitious scholarly output in the genre of hadith commentary, with multivolume compendia like Khalīl Aḥmad Sahāranpūrī’s (d. 1927) Badhl al-majhūd and ʿAbd al-Raḥmān Mubārakpūrī’s (d. 1935) Tuḥfat al-aḥwadhī. While there is new scholarly interest in hadith commentary, the focus has been on sustained modern commentaries like the aforementioned compendia or on premodern commentaries like those of the Mamluk-era hadith commentators. However, there is a substantial yet overlooked body of work between these two periods: nineteenth century marginal glosses on lithographed hadith literature. In this essay, I explore the impact of these marginal glosses on the competition over scholarly authority in the region. Among other things, these marginalia served as subtle yet crucial guides for readers within the madrasa network, particularly at a time when the advent of print technology intersected with intra-Muslim legal debates among the Ahl-i Ḥadīth and the Ḥanafīs. These marginalia are an ideal site to examine the divergent views of both groups, as they occupy the margins of the very hadith collections that shaped the former and conflicted with the legal practices of the latter.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 565 | 565 | 364 |
| Full Text Views | 23 | 23 | 13 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 43 | 43 | 26 |
Hidden in the Margins: Contesting Legal Authority in Marginal Hadith Glosses
In: Islamic Law and SocietySearch for other papers by Muntasir Zaman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
In the twentieth century, India witnessed a significant and ambitious scholarly output in the genre of hadith commentary, with multivolume compendia like Khalīl Aḥmad Sahāranpūrī’s (d. 1927) Badhl al-majhūd and ʿAbd al-Raḥmān Mubārakpūrī’s (d. 1935) Tuḥfat al-aḥwadhī. While there is new scholarly interest in hadith commentary, the focus has been on sustained modern commentaries like the aforementioned compendia or on premodern commentaries like those of the Mamluk-era hadith commentators. However, there is a substantial yet overlooked body of work between these two periods: nineteenth century marginal glosses on lithographed hadith literature. In this essay, I explore the impact of these marginal glosses on the competition over scholarly authority in the region. Among other things, these marginalia served as subtle yet crucial guides for readers within the madrasa network, particularly at a time when the advent of print technology intersected with intra-Muslim legal debates among the Ahl-i Ḥadīth and the Ḥanafīs. These marginalia are an ideal site to examine the divergent views of both groups, as they occupy the margins of the very hadith collections that shaped the former and conflicted with the legal practices of the latter.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 565 | 565 | 364 |
| Full Text Views | 23 | 23 | 13 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 43 | 43 | 26 |
