Mongolia’s new resource politics, central to the country’s geopolitical considerations and ambitions in the twenty-first century, must be understood in relation to their complex, multi-scalar socio-cultural, historical and environmental dimensions. This paper draws on the author’s participatory research activities with key informants in Ulaanbaatar and amongst rural herding communities to illuminate key aspects, contexts and implications of the new resource politics. Specifically, the paper presents an empirically informed analysis of pertinent social and institutional forms, environmental and cultural values and aspects of resource governance, with particular reference to land issues, pastoralism, mining and resistance. Conceptually, it draws on recent work, especially in geography and political ecology, on activism, conservation and particularly on emerging discourses and framings of natural resources as ‘ecosystem services’. Through attention to these concepts, it highlights contested dimensions of environmental values and valuation, of critical contemporary importance in Mongolia’s new resource politics.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Agrawal A. Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources World Development 2001 29 1649 72
Agrawal A. & Ostrom E. Collective action, property rights, and decentralisation in resource use in India and Nepal Politics and Society 2001 29 4 485 514
Arsel M. & Buscher B. NatureTM Inc: Changes and continuities in neoliberal conservation and market-based environmental policy Development and Change 2012 43 1 53 78
Bebbington A. Underground political ecologies: The second annual lecture of the Cultural and Political Ecology Speciality Group of the Association of American Geographers Geoforum 2012 43 1152 62
Bebbington D. Extraction, inequality and indigenous peoples: insights from Bolivia Environmental Science and Policy 2013 33 438 446
Beck L., Mendel T. & Thindwa J. The Enabling Environment for Social Accountability in Mongolia 2007 (accessed 23/11/12) Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia World Bank Available at http://www.sasanet.org/curriculum_final/downlaods/ev/Case%20Studies/ee%20cs3.pdf
Brockington D. Brockington D., Duffy R. & Igoe J. Conservation and capitalism Nature Unbound: Conservation, Capitalism and the Future of Protected Areas 2008 London Earthscan 175 201
Cheng A., Kruger L. & Daniels S. ‘Place’ as an integrating concept in natural resource politics: Propositions for a social science research agenda Society and Natural Resources 2003 16 87 104
Emel J., Huber M. & Makene M. Extracting sovereignty: capital, territory and gold mining in Tanzania Political Geography 2011 30 70 79
Endicott E. A History of Land Use in Mongolia: The Thirteenth Century to the Present 2012 New York Palgrave Macmillan
Fernández-Giménez M. Spatial and social boundaries and the paradox of pastoral land tenure: A case study from post-socialist Mongolia Human Ecology 2002 30 49 78
Fernández-Giménez M. & Batbuyan B. Law and disorder: Local implementation of Mongolia’s Land Law Development and Change 2004 35 141 61
Fernández-Giménez M., Wang X., Bathishig B., Klein J. & Reid Robin Restoring Community Connections to the Land: Building Resilience Through Community-Based Rangeland Management in China and Mongolia 2012 Wallingford CABI
Fish R. Environmental decision-making and an ecosystems approach: some challenges from the perspective of social science Progress in Physical Geography 2011 35 671 80
High M. & Schlesinger J. Rulers and rascals: the politics of gold in Mongolian Qing history Central Asian Survey 2010 29 3 289 304
Johnson C. Uncommon ground: the ‘poverty of history’ in common property discourse Development and Change 2004 35 3 407 33
Leach M. & Scoones I. Mobilising Citizens: Social Movements and the Politics of Knowledge ids Working Paper 276 2007 Brighton University of Sussex, Institute of Development Studies
McDonald K. & Corson C. teeb begins now: a virtual moment in the production of natural capital Development and Change 2012 43 1 159 84
Mearns R. Community, collective action and common grazing: the case of post-socialist Mongolia Journal of Development Studies 1996 32 297 339
Milne S. & Adams W.M. Market masquerades: uncovering the politics of community-level payments for environmental services in Cambodia Development and Change 2012 43 1 133 58
Mongolian Nature Protection Coalition (mnpc) 2007 Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia MNPC Membership Directory
Mongolian Nature Protection Civil Movement Coalition (mnpcm) Green Star: Mongolian Nature and Environment Legislative Scorecard. Fall 2009 and Spring 2010 Parliamentary Session 2010 Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia Soyombo Printing
New Zealand Nature Institute (nzni) Gobi Regional Component, Project ‘Conservation and Sustainable Management of Natural Resources’: Summary of Project Strategies, and Impacts on Local Livelihoods and Natural Resources 2006 Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia NZNI
Ostrom E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action 1990 Cambridge Cambridge University Press
Peters P. Challenges in land tenure and land reform in Africa: anthropological contributions World Development 2009 37 8 1317 25
Potschin M. & Haines-Young R. Ecosystem services: exploring a geographical perspective Progress in Physical Geography 2011 35 5 575 94
Robertson M. Measurement and alienation: making a world of ecosystem services Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 2012 37 386 401
Scott H. Colonialism, landscape and the subterranean Geography Compass 2008 2 6 1853 69
Sick D. Social contexts and consequences of institutional change in common pool resource management Society and Natural Resources 2008 21 94 105
Sneath D. Notions of rights over land and the history of Mongolian pastoralism Inner Asia 2001 3 41 59
Sneath D. Landuse, the environment and development in post-socialist Mongolia Oxford Development Studies 2003 31 4 441 59
Snow K.H. Goldman Prizewinner Gets 21 Years for Resistance to Genocide: Foreign Mining, State Corruption and Genocide in Mongolia 2014 (accessed 1/3/13) Available online at: http://www.globalresearch.ca/foreign-mining-state-corruption-and-human-rights-in-mongolia/5367622
Sullivan S. Green capitalism and the cultural poverty of constructing nature as service provider Radical Anthropology 2009 3 18 27
Sullivan S. Banking Nature? The Financialisation of Environmental Conservation oac Press, Working Paper 2011 (accessed 2/3/13) Series 8 Available at http://openanthcoop.net/press/http:/openanthcoop.net/press/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Sullivan-Banking-Nature.pdf
Sullivan S. After the Green Rush? Biodiversity Offsets, Uranium Power and the “Calculus of Casualties” in Greening Growth 2012 (accessed 2/3/13) Available online at: http://siansullivan.net/2012/04/24/after-the-green-rush-biodiversity-offsets-uranium-power-and-the-calculus-of-casualties-in-greening-growth/
Sullivan S. Banking nature? The spectacular financialisation of environmental conservation Antipode 2013 45 1 198 217
Suzuki Y. Yamamura N., Fujita N. & Maekawa A. Conflict between mining development and nomadism in Mongolia The Mongolian Ecosystem Network: Environmental Issues under Climate and Social Changes 2013 Tokyo Springer 269 94
United Nations Development Programme Sustainable Grassland Management Project Exit Strategy 2007 Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia UNDP (mon/02/301)
Upton C. Social capital, collective action and group formation: developmental trajectories in post-socialist Mongolia Human Ecology 2008 36 175 88
Upton C. Custom and contestation: land reform in post-socialist Mongolia World Development 2009 37 8 1400 10
Upton C. Nomadism, identity and the politics of conservation Central Asian Survey 2010 29 3 305 19
Upton C. Managing Mongolia’s commons: land reforms, social contexts and institutional change Society and Natural Resources 2012a 25 156 75
Upton C. Values and valuation: new approaches to conservation in Mongolia Darwin Initiative Newsletter 2012b (accessed 2/2/13) 9 July 2012 Available at www.darwininitiative.org.uk/. . ./Darwin-Newletter-Issue-21-July-2012.pdf
World Bank Mongolia: A Review of Environmental and Social Impacts in the Mining Sector 2006 (accessed 3/2/13) Washington World Bank Available online at http://siteresources.worldbank.org/intmongolia/Resources/Mongolia-Mining.pdf
After Bebbington (2012).
Bebbington (2013) uses the term ‘landscapes of meaning’ to refer to ‘cultural meaning in the form of territory’ for local indigenous populations, thus moving beyond concerns with land ownership per se, and indicating concepts of value that elude economic valuation techniques.
From the late 1950s until the early 1990s, herders in Mongolia’s rural areas were members of Soviet-inspired, state-run collectives (negdel). Amongst their other roles in regulating herders’ livelihoods and labour, negdel were responsible for conferring land rights on constituent herder divisions (e.g. brigades) and for managing land use in their territories, including herders’ movement between seasonal pastures. The degree to which aspects of negdel-era land use and land rights reflected pre collective ‘traditional’ or ‘customary’ norms is contested and geographically variable, albeit with general reductions in herders’ mobility linked to changes in administrative boundaries in the negdel period (Mearns 1996; Upton 2009). Pastureland remained in state ownership during these changes and to the present day, although the post-decollectivisation era has been marked by (ongoing) debates over appropriate forms of land rights and tenure.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1002 | 76 | 14 |
Full Text Views | 230 | 13 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 81 | 16 | 5 |
Mongolia’s new resource politics, central to the country’s geopolitical considerations and ambitions in the twenty-first century, must be understood in relation to their complex, multi-scalar socio-cultural, historical and environmental dimensions. This paper draws on the author’s participatory research activities with key informants in Ulaanbaatar and amongst rural herding communities to illuminate key aspects, contexts and implications of the new resource politics. Specifically, the paper presents an empirically informed analysis of pertinent social and institutional forms, environmental and cultural values and aspects of resource governance, with particular reference to land issues, pastoralism, mining and resistance. Conceptually, it draws on recent work, especially in geography and political ecology, on activism, conservation and particularly on emerging discourses and framings of natural resources as ‘ecosystem services’. Through attention to these concepts, it highlights contested dimensions of environmental values and valuation, of critical contemporary importance in Mongolia’s new resource politics.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1002 | 76 | 14 |
Full Text Views | 230 | 13 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 81 | 16 | 5 |