While Mongolian citizens have a ‘right’ (erh) to receive a plot of urban land from their government, accessing and keeping land in Ulaanbaatar is not necessarily a clear-cut process. Situated in the confluence between the two main property regimes of temporary possession (ezemshil) as well as ownership (ömchlöl), this paper traces the slippages that occur as people attempt to make and hold onto land plots. It does this by ethnographically charting one person’s quest to secure legal ownership of their land. Here, the importance of cadastral mapping emerges as an essential but fraught practice that can either build or break the bridge between socially acquired land and the formation of its bureaucratic legitimacy. Securing the right map of this land forced a number of social, economic and bureaucratic issues into view, revealing how people negotiate uncertain bureaucratic processes, difficult physical terrain and fluctuating value in Ulaanbaatar’s commercialised land market.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Anderson R. , Hooper M. & Tuvshinbat A. Towers on the steppe: compact city plans and local perceptions of urban densification in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability 2016 doi: 10.1080/17549175.2016.1223739
Bayartsetseg T. Social exclusion in the ger districts of Ulaanbaatar Emerging Subjects Blog 2015 accessed 19 February 2016 24 June 2015. https://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/mongolian-economy/2015/06/24/social-exclusion-in-the-ger-districts-of-ulaanbaatar/
Bonilla Lauren In Search of the Boom in Resource Rich Mongolia: Development, Debt, and Disorder Forthcoming UCL Press Manuscript in preparation
Busse M. & Strang V. Busse M. & Strang V. Introduction: ownership and appropriation Ownership and Appropriation 2011 Oxford/New York Berg 1 19
Choi C. Inexorable rise of ger in Mongolia: demolition for redevelopment or conservation for improvement? International Review of Public Administration 2012 17 2 121 141
Chu J.Y. When infrastructures attack: the workings of disrepair in China American Ethnologist 2014 41 2 351 367
Cross J. The economy of anticipation—hope, infrastructure, and economic zones in south India Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 2015 35 3 424 437
Dettoni J. Mongolia’s property boom set to cool Nikkei Asian Review 2014 March 13 accessed 10 February 2017 http://asia.nikkei.com/magazine/20140313-The-Xi-show/Markets/Mongolia-s-property-boom-set-to-cool
Empson R. Da Col Giovanni Claiming resources, honoring debts: miners, herders, and the masters of the land in Mongolia Ethnos: Journal of Anthropology Forthcoming Special issue on cosmopolitics
Endicott E. A History of Land Use in Mongolia: The thirteenth century to the present 2012 New York (NY) Palgrave Macmillan
Goldstein D.M. Outlawed: Between security and rights in a Bolivian city 2012 Durham (NC) Duke University Press
Guyer J. Prophecy and the near future: thoughts on macroeconomic, evangelical, and punctuated time American Ethnologist 2007 34 3 409 421
Humphrey Caroline Hirsch E. Chiefly and Shamanist Landscapes The Anthropology of Landscape—Perspectives on Place and Space 1995 Oxford Clarendon Press 135 162
Jensen C.B. Infrastructural fractals: revisiting the micro-macro distinction in social theory Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 2007 25 832 850
Leach J. Leach J. & Kalinoe L. Land, trees and history: disputes involving boundaries and identities in the context of development Rationales of Ownership: Transactions and claims to ownership in contemporary Papua New Guinea 2004 Wantage Sean Kingston Publishing 42 56
Miller J.E. Nomadic and Domestic: Dwelling on the edge of Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia 2013 PhD thesis. University of California, Los Angeles
Mongolian Economy Mortgages and risk in the construction industry Mongolian Economy 2015 May 21 accessed 10 February 2017 http://mongolianeconomy.mn/en/i/8011
Myers F.R. Pintupi Country, Pintupi Self: Sentiment, place, and politics among Western Desert Aborigines 1986 Washington/London Smithsonian Institution Press Canberra: Australian Institution of Aboriginal Studies
Pedersen M.A. & Højer L. Lost in transition: fuzzy property and leaky selves in Ulaanbaatar Ethnos 2008 73 1 1 23
Pedersen M.A. & Højer L. Urban Hunters—Dealing and dreaming in times of transition Forthcoming Yale University Press
Pinker A. Papering over the gaps: documents, infrastructure and political experimentation in highland Peru Cambridge Journal of Anthropology 2015 33 1 97 112
Schwenkel C. Spectacular infrastructure and its breakdown in socialist Vietnam American Ethnologist 2015 42 3 520 534
Simone A. Graham S. & McFarlane C. Relational infrastructures in postcolonial urban worlds Infrastructural Lives 2015 London/New York Routledge 17 38
Sneath D. Notions of rights over land and the history of Mongolian pastoralism Inner Asia 2001 3 1 41 58
Strathern M. Kalinoe L. & Leach J. Introduction: rationales of ownership Rationales of Ownership: Transactions and claims to ownership in contemporary Papua New Guinea 2004 Wantage Sean Kingston Publishing 1 12
Strathern M. Chesters T. Land: intangible or tangible property? Land Rights, The Oxford Amnesty Lectures 2005 2009 Oxford Oxford University Press 13 38
Tsing A. The Mushroom at the End of the World—On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins 2015 Princeton/Oxford Princeton University Press
World Bank Land Administration and Management in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia 2015 Washington (DC) World Bank
Zimmermann A.E. Dierkes J. Local leaders between obligation and corruption: state workplaces, the discourse of ‘moral decay’, and ‘eating money’ in the Mongolian province Change in Democratic Mongolia—Social Relations, Health, Mobile Pastoralism, and Mining 2012 Leiden/Boston Brill 83 109
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 604 | 141 | 15 |
Full Text Views | 252 | 24 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 122 | 30 | 4 |
While Mongolian citizens have a ‘right’ (erh) to receive a plot of urban land from their government, accessing and keeping land in Ulaanbaatar is not necessarily a clear-cut process. Situated in the confluence between the two main property regimes of temporary possession (ezemshil) as well as ownership (ömchlöl), this paper traces the slippages that occur as people attempt to make and hold onto land plots. It does this by ethnographically charting one person’s quest to secure legal ownership of their land. Here, the importance of cadastral mapping emerges as an essential but fraught practice that can either build or break the bridge between socially acquired land and the formation of its bureaucratic legitimacy. Securing the right map of this land forced a number of social, economic and bureaucratic issues into view, revealing how people negotiate uncertain bureaucratic processes, difficult physical terrain and fluctuating value in Ulaanbaatar’s commercialised land market.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 604 | 141 | 15 |
Full Text Views | 252 | 24 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 122 | 30 | 4 |