Setting the Table for Success – or Failure? Agenda Management in the WTO

in International Negotiation
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

How does the agenda management process influence the effectiveness of multilateral trade talks in the World Trade Organization (WTO)? How can the all-important agenda be shaped so as to enhance the prospects of an agreement being reached? How the agenda is managed directly affects the negotiation process which follows and the eventual outcome. Yet researchers have paid little attention to the particular dynamics and challenges of agenda management in large-scale multilateral negotiations, and actual practice points to several weaknesses. This article proposes that the complexity of the agenda in multilateral talks needs to be managed and reduced in procedurally just ways if a successful outcome (agreement) is to result. It develops an analytical framework of agenda management in multilateral negotiations and conducts a structured focused comparison to explain the differences in outcomes of two rounds of WTO negotiations: the failure of the 2003 Cancún Ministerial Conference and the success of the 2004 Geneva negotiations in reaching an agreement. The findings support the proposition that a successful outcome depends in part on reducing agenda complexity and that this needs to be achieved in procedurally acceptable (if not just) ways.

Setting the Table for Success – or Failure? Agenda Management in the WTO

in International Negotiation

Sections

References

AlbinC. Justice and Fairness in International Negotiation 2001 New York Cambridge University Press

AlbinC. “Using negotiation to promote legitimacy: an assessment of proposals for reforming the WTO” International Affairs 2008 84 4 757

AlbinC.DruckmanD. KilgourM.EdenC. “The Role of Justice in Negotiation” Handbook of Group Decision and Negotiation 2010 Part 1 Springer Publishers Advances in Group Decision and Negotiation 4

BarryB. Justice as Impartiality 1995 Oxford Clarendon Press

BeattyA. “Trade Text Biased, Says Brussels” EU Observer 2003 August 27

BernalR. L. “The Doha Development Agenda after Cancún: An Insider’s View” Integracion & Comercio 2003 7 19 21 43

BlusteinP. Misadventures of the Most Favored Nations: Clashing Egos Inflated Ambitions and the Shambles of the World Trade System 2009 New York Public Affairs

Bridges Daily Update “On the Fifth WTO Ministerial Conference” 2003a September 11 available at: http://ictsd.org/downloads/2008/08/ben030911.pdf.

Bridges Daily Update “On the Fifth WTO Ministerial Conference” 2003b September 13 available at: http://ictsd.org/downloads/2008/08/ben030913.pdf.

Bridges Daily Update “On the Fifth WTO Ministerial Conference” 2003c September 14 available at: http://ictsd.org/downloads/2008/08/ben030914.pdf.

Bridges Daily Update “On the Fifth WTO Ministerial Conference” 2003d September 15 available at: http://ictsd.org/downloads/2008/08/ben030915.pdf.

Bridges Monthly ICTSD 2004 July–August 8 7 Available at: http://ictsd.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/bridges08-07.pdf.

Bridges Weekly Trade News Digest ICTSD 2003a July 28 7 27 available at: http://ictsd.net/downloads/bridgesweekly/bridgesweekly7–27.pdf.

Bridges Weekly Trade News Digest ICTSD 2003b August 28 7 29 available at: http://ictsd.org/downloads/bridgesweekly/bridgesweekly7–29.pdf.

Bridges Weekly Trade News Digest ICTSD 2004 August 2 8 27 available at: http://ictsd.org/downloads/bridgesweekly/bridgesweekly8–27.pdf.

CrumpL.ZartmanI. W. “Multilateral Negotiation and the Management of Complexity” International Negotiation 2003 8 1 5

DasD. The Doha Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: Arduous Issues and Strategic Responses 2005 New York Palgrave MacMillan

Doha Round Briefing Series – Cancún Update “Agriculture” The International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD) and the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) 2003a 2 2

Doha Round Briefing Series – Cancún Update “The Singapore Issues: Investment, Competition Policy, Transparency in Government Procurement and Trade Faciliation” The International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD) and the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) 2003b 2 6

EvenettS. J. “The Failure of the WTO Ministerial Meeting in Cancún Implications For Future Research” CESifo Forum 2003 3 11 17

GibsonJ. L. “Understandings of justice: Institutional legitimacy, procedural justice, and political tolerance” Law & Society Review 1989 23 3 469 496

GrayS. “Developing Nations Attack Trade Proposal” Washington Post 2003 August 26

HaasE. “Why Collaborate? Issue-Linkage and International Regimes” World Politics 1980 April 32 3 357 405

HealdD. HoodC.HealdD. “Varieties of Transparency” Transparency: The Key to Better Governance? 2006 Oxford Oxford University Press

Hollander-BlumoffR.TylerT. “Procedural Justice in Negotiation: Procedural Fairness, Outcome Acceptance, and Integrative Potential” Law & Social Inquiry 2008 33 2 473 500

IsmailF. “A Development Perspective on the WTO July 2004 General Council Decision” Journal of International Economic Law 2005 8 2 377 404

KhorM. 2003a “An analysis of the WTO’s Fifth Ministerial Conference” 10–14 September 2003 Cancún available at http://www.g24.org/khorgva.pdf.

KhorM. “Cancún Draft is Imbalanced, Say Developing Countries” Third World Network 2003b August 26 Geneva.

KonovskyM. “Understanding Procedural Justice and its Impact on Business Organizations” Journal of Management 2000 26 3 489 512

LindE. A.TylerT. R. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice 1988 New York Plenum

MagnerN. “Enhancing Procedural Justice in Local Government Budget and Tax Decision Making” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2000 30 4 798 815

NarlikarA.TussieD. “The G20 at the Cancún Ministerial: Developing Countries and their Evolving Coalitions in the WTO” The World Economy 2004 27 7 947

NarlikarA.TussieD.WilkinsonR. “Collapse at the WTO: A Cancún post-mortem” Third World Quarterly 2004 25 3 447

OdellJ. “Breaking Deadlocks in International Institutional Negotiations: The WTO, Seattle and Doha” International Studies Quarterly 2009 53 2 273 299

OdellJ. “Chairing a WTO Negotiation” Journal of International Economic Law 2005 8 2 425 448

OshimaS. 2010 Personal interview with Shotaro Oshima, Chair of the WTO General Council and Japan’s Permanent Representative to the WTO at the time of the 2004 Geneva negotiations 21 October 2010

OshimaS. KanitzRoberto “Wrapping the July (2004) Package” Managing Multilateral Trade Negotiations: The Role of the WTO Chairman 2011 London Cameron May

PendergastW. R. “Managing the Negotiation Agenda” Negotiation Journal 1990 6 2 135 145

PettigrewP. 2010 Personal interview with Pierre Pettigrew, Canada’s Minister of International Trade (1999–2003) and Working Group Chair of the Singapore Issues at the 2003 WTO Ministerial Conference 15 Septemeber 2010 Cancún

PruzinD.YerkeyG. “Agriculture: Head of WTO Agriculture Negotiating Group Begins Drafting Framework With Time Waning” WTO Reporter 2004 July 29

RollandS. “Redesigning the Negotiation Process at the WTO” Journal of International Economic Law 2010 13 1 65 110

SebeniusJ. “Negotiation arithmetic: adding and subtracting issues and parties” International Organization 1983 Spring 37 2 281 316

SjöstedtG. SpectorB.SjöstedtG.ZartmanI. W. “Issue Clarification and the Role of Consensual Knowledge in the UNCED Process” Negotiating International Regimes: Lessons Learned from the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development 1994 London Graham and Trotman/Martinus Nijhoff

TallbergJ. “The agenda-shaping powers of the EU Council Presidency” Journal of European Public Policy 2003 February 10 1 1 19

TallbergJ. “The Power of the Chair: Formal Leadership in International Cooperation” International Studies Quartely 2010 54 241 265

ThibautJ.WalkerL. Procedural justice: A psychological analysis 1975 Hillsdale, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum

TylerT.CaineA. “The influence of outcomes and procedures on satisfaction with formal leaders” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1981 41 4 642 655

The Warwick Commission The Multilateral Trade Regime: Which Way Forward? 2007 Coventry, UK The University of Warwick

WatkinsM. “Strategic Simplification: Toward a Theory of Modular Design in Negotiation” International Negotiation 2003 8 149 167

WolfA. SpectorB.SjöstedtG.ZartmanI. W. “Food Security, Environment, and Development: A Case Analysis of Process Dynamics” Negotiating International Regimes: Lessons Learned from the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development 1994 London Graham and Trotman/Martinus Nijhoff

WolfeR. “The WTO Single Undertaking as Negotiating Technique and Constitutive Metaphor” Journal of International Economic Law 2009 12 4 835 858

World Trade Report 2007 Geneva, Switzerland The World Trade Organization

WTO “DDA July 2004 Package: Meeting Summary 28 July (Chairs report progress as hours tick by)” 2004 available at: http://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news04_e/dda_package_sum_28july04_e.htm.

ZartmanI. W. International Multilateral Negotiation: Approaches to the Management of Complexity 1994 San Francisco, CA Jossey-Bass

ZartmanI. W. “Conclusion: Managing Complexity” International Negotiation 2003 8 179 186

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 35 35 16
Full Text Views 92 92 60
PDF Downloads 5 5 2
EPUB Downloads 1 1 0