Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have remained outside all the GATT rounds since the 1950s. In contrast, hundreds of NGOs have taken part in the current WTO round. This article maps the formal participation of NGOs in five ministerial conferences during the Doha round. It also analyzes various forms of NGO involvement in the WTO trade talks, such as lobbying and capacity-building of developing countries. An assessment of the current and potential capacities of NGOs in the Doha round requires that their performance be seen from an explicit negotiation perspective. Both NGO participation and involvement, as well the interaction between these two forms of NGO performance need to be considered. An assessment of how NGOs may have an impact on negotiation effectiveness and efficiency in WTO rounds should be approached from a long-term perspective and should consider other kinds of outcomes than formal final agreements. NGO performance in WTO may increase the complexity of negotiations or the significance of non-trade issues. NGO activities outside the WTO may disturb multilateral trade negotiations in the short term, such as during ongoing Ministerial Conferences. On the other hand, NGOs may also help to pave the way for constructive long-term changes in the WTO regime, which, in turn, may have a favorable impact on the effectiveness and efficiency of the overall WTO negotiation system.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
“About UNCTAD”, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development Homepage 1992
Albin Cecilia “Can NGOs enhance the effectiveness of international negotiations?” International Negotiation 1999 4 3 371 387
Anheier Helmut, Glasius Marlies & Kaldor Mary Global Civil Society 2001 2001 Oxford Oxford University Press
Bagwhati Jagdish “Reshaping the WTO” Far Eastern Economic Review 2005 25 30 January/February 2005
Office of Trade Negotiations, WTO Bagwhati Jagdish & Sutherland Peter The Doha Round. Setting a Deadline and Defining a Final Deal 2011
Baldwin Richard & Evenett Simon Why World Leaders Must Resist the False Promise of Another Doha Delay. 2011 London Centre for Economic Policy Research
Baogang He & Murphy Hannah “Global social justice at the WTO. The role of NGOs in constructing global contracts” International Affairs 2007 83 4 707 727
Barfield Claude Free Trade, Sovereignty, Democracy: the Future of the World Trade Organization 2001 Washington, D.C. AEI Press
Bebbington Antony & Mitlin Diana Can NGOs Make a Difference? The Challenge of Development Alternatives 2007 London ZED Books
Betsil Michele & Corell Elisabeth The Influence Of Nongovernmental Organizations In International Environmental Negotiations 2007 Cambridge MA MIT Press
Busch Lutz-Alexander, Wen Quan, Felli Leonardo & Anderlini Luca “Costly bargaining and renegotiation” Econometrica 2001 69 4 377 411 (March 2001)
Butler John “Trust, expectations, information sharing, climate of trust, and negotiation effectiveness and efficiency” Group & Organization Management 1999 24 217 238
Clapp Jennifer & Dauvergne Peter Paths to a Green World; The Political Economy of The Global Environment 2005 Cambridge MA MIT Press
Cline William, Kawanabe Noboru, Kronsjö T.O.M. & Williams Thomas Trade Negotiations in the Tokyo Round. A Quantitative Assessment 1978 Washington D.C. Brooking Institution
Congressional Record – House 24 200, December 6, 2001
Coote Belinda The Trade Gap: Poverty and the Global Commodities Markets 1996 Oxford Oxfam
Coulby Hilary Going to Qatar. How to get a NGO representative in your government delegation. Two case studies from the WTO Ministerial in Seattle 2000 London The UK NGO Trade Network
DeLuca Kevin & Peeples Jennifer “From Public Sphere to Public Screen: Democracy, Activism, and the “Violence”of Seattle” Critical Studies in Media Communication 2002 19 2 125 151
Doh Jonathan & Guay Terrence ”Corporate Social Responsibility, Public Policy, and NGO Activism in Europe and the United States: An Institutional-Stakeholder Perspective” Journal of Management Studies 2006 43 1 47 73
Doha development agenda: Negotiations, implementation and development 2008 Geneva World Trade Organization
“Doha Round: Keep talking or break it off ?” Alliance sud 2009 12 16
Doherty Ann Spector Bertram, Sjöstedt Gunnar & Zartman I. William “The Role of Nongovernmental Organizations in UNCED” Negotiating International Regimes. Lessons Learned from the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development 1994 London Graham & Trotman/Martinus Nijhoff
Ehlermann Claus WTO Decision-making Procedures: Member-Driven Rule-Making and WTO Consensus Practices. Are They Adequate? 2005 Dayton OH Wilmerhale
Epsteiņ Marc & Schnietz Karen “Measuring the cost of environmental and labour protests to globalization: An Event Study of the Failed 1999 Seattle WTO Talks” The International Trade Journal 2002 16 2 129
Evans John The Kennedy Round in American Trade Policy. The Twilight of the GATT 1970 Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press
Evans John Van Dijk Pitou & Faber Gerrit “The Trade Union’s View on International Labor Standards. A Comment” Challenges to the New World Trade Organization 1996 The Hague Kluwer Law International
Francois Joseph, McDonald Bradley & Nordström Håkan User’s Guide to Uruguay Round Assessments 1996 Geneva WTO
“General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade” Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 2011
Goffman Erving Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience 1974 Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press
the World Trade Organization “Guidelines for NGO participation in the work of WTO” Homepage 2011
Hoekman Bernard, Michalopoulos Constantine & Winter Alan “Special and different treatment of developing countries in the WTO: Moving forward after Cancun” The World Economy 2004 27 4 481 506
Hoekman Bernard, Michalopoulos Constantine, Winter Alan & Mavroidis Petros WTO Dispute Settlement, Transparency and Surveillance 2008 Washington, DC World Bank
Hudec Robert “The New WTO Dispute Settlement Procedure: An Overview of the First Three Years” Minnesota Journal of Global Trade 1999 8 2 1 53
Kramer Roderick & Messick David Negotiation as a Social Process 1995 London SAGE Publications
Krasner Stephen D. “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables.” International Organization 1982 36 2 185 205
Kremenyuk Victor International Negotiation. Analysis, Approaches, Issues 2002 San Francisco, CA Jossey Bass
Kupfer Schneider Andrea ”Shattering Negotiation Myths: Emprical Evidence on the Effective of Negotiation Style” Harvard Negotiation Law Review 2002 7 143
The EU, WTO Agricultural Negotiations and Interest Groups Landau Alice 2000 Paper presented to the ECPR Joint Sessions 14–19 April 2000 Copenhagen
Leary Virginia & Warner Daniel Social Issues, Globalization and International Institutions. Labor Rights and the WEU, ILO, OECD and WTO 2006 Leiden Martinus Nijhoff Publications
Lee Jihong & Sabourian Hamid “Efficiency in Negotiation: Complexity and Costly Bargaining” Birkbeck Working Papers in Economics and Finance 2005 No. 505
Mwangi W. Churie Kallhauge Angela, Sjöstedt Gunnar & Corell Elisabeth “Three decades of NGO activism in international environmental negotiations” Global Challenges. Furthering the Multilateral Process for Sustainable Development 2005 Aizlewood’s Mill Greenleaf Publishing
“NGO representation on Indian government delegation to the Doha Ministerial Conference” http//www.cuts-advocacy-ngo.htm
Nicolaïdis Calypso Nicolaïdis Calypso & Bressand Albert “Learning While Negotiating: How Services Got on the Uruguay Round Agenda.” Strategic Trends in Services – An Inquiry into the Global Services Economy 1989 New York Harper and Row
“Only G8 U-turn could prevent WTO meltdown” Oxfam International 2006 July 16
Pettenger Mary The Social Construction of Climate Change. Power, Knowledge, Norms, Discources 2007 London Ashgate
World Trade Organization “Pre-WTO legal texts. Havana Charter.” Homepage 2011
Raustiala Kai “States, NGOs, and International Institutions” International Studies 1997 41 719 740
Regan John ”Security fortress shuts down anti-WTO protest in Sydney” Agence France Presse 2002 Friday 15 November 2002
Rittberger Volker Regime Theory and International Relations 1995 Oxford Oxford University Press
Sjöstedt Gunnar & Sundelius Bengt Free trade–Managed Trade?: Perspectives on a Realistic International Trade Order 1986 Boulder, CO Westview Press
Trachtman Joel “The Domain of WTO Dispute Resolution,” Harvard International Law Journal 1999 40 2 333 377
“Trade Capacity Development for Africa” Trade Negotiations and Africa Series No. 2. 2005 Geneva United Nations United Nations Conference on Trade and Development/United Nations Development Programme
“Trade facilitation, technical assistance and capacity building” Homepage Geneva World Trade Organization
Treves Tullio, di Rattalma Marco Frigessi, Tanzi Attila, Fodella Alessandro & Pitea Cesare Civil Society, International Courts and Compliance Bodies 2004 Cambridge Cambridge University Press
“Understanding the WTO: The GATT years: from Havana to Marrakesh” Homepage 2011 Geneva The World Trade Organization
Unmüssig Barbara NGOs and Climate Crisis: Fragmentation, Lines of Conflict and Strategic Approaches 2010 Berlin Heinrich Böll Stiftung
UN Press Release, 11 June, 2008
WT/L/162
WT/INF/30, 12 April 2001
World Trade Organization Ministerial Conference 18 and 20 May, 1998 WT/MIN(98)/ST/10
WT/MIN(98)/ST/10
WTO The Seventh Session of the WTO Ministerial Conference 30 November to 2 December 2009 Geneva
WTO Treaty 1994
World Trade Organization “WTO and Organizations (NGOs). Relations with Non-Governmental Organizations/Civil Society.” Homepage
Zartman I. William “Common Elements in the Analysis of the Negotiation Process” Negotiation Journal 1988 4 1 31 43
Zartman I. William International Multilateral Negotiation: Approaches to the Management of Complexity 1994 San Francisco Jossey-Bass
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 200 | 22 | 1 |
Full Text Views | 184 | 6 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 40 | 17 | 1 |
Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have remained outside all the GATT rounds since the 1950s. In contrast, hundreds of NGOs have taken part in the current WTO round. This article maps the formal participation of NGOs in five ministerial conferences during the Doha round. It also analyzes various forms of NGO involvement in the WTO trade talks, such as lobbying and capacity-building of developing countries. An assessment of the current and potential capacities of NGOs in the Doha round requires that their performance be seen from an explicit negotiation perspective. Both NGO participation and involvement, as well the interaction between these two forms of NGO performance need to be considered. An assessment of how NGOs may have an impact on negotiation effectiveness and efficiency in WTO rounds should be approached from a long-term perspective and should consider other kinds of outcomes than formal final agreements. NGO performance in WTO may increase the complexity of negotiations or the significance of non-trade issues. NGO activities outside the WTO may disturb multilateral trade negotiations in the short term, such as during ongoing Ministerial Conferences. On the other hand, NGOs may also help to pave the way for constructive long-term changes in the WTO regime, which, in turn, may have a favorable impact on the effectiveness and efficiency of the overall WTO negotiation system.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 200 | 22 | 1 |
Full Text Views | 184 | 6 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 40 | 17 | 1 |