Is Reconciliation Negotiable?

in International Negotiation
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to question some basic assumptions regarding reconciliation after wars and mass atrocities. Indeed, how can numerous policy-makers, practitioners, and scholars contend that reconciliation is necessary while it is often distrusted and rejected by victims? Are there not cases where calls for reconciliation would prove to be fruitless and even detrimental for peace and/or democracy? To answer these questions, it is worth looking at the interactions between reconciliation and negotiation. Beyond a theoretical interest, this question has a direct impact for practitioners; a better understanding of the issue is actually a sine qua non condition for more efficient interventions. In terms of methodology, this study refers to various examples as illustrative cases (Afghanistan, Rwanda, South-Africa, and the Franco-German case). Its objective is not to capture the complexity of each case study but to determine to what extent reconciliation can be considered as negotiable.

Is Reconciliation Negotiable?

in International Negotiation

Sections

References

Abu-NimerMohammed Reconciliation Justice and Coexistence. Theories and Practice 2001 Lanham Lexington Books

AckermannAlice “Reconciliation as a Peace-Building Process in Post-War Europe: The Franco-German case” Peace and Change 1994 19 3 229 250

AllenJonathan “Balancing Justice and Social Unity: Political Theory and the Idea of a Truth and Reconciliation Commission” University of Toronto Law Journal 1999 49 3 315 353

AméryJean Par-delà le crime et le châtiment. Essai pour surmonter le mal 1995 Paris Actes sud

AmstutzMark R. The Healing of Nations. The Promise and Limits of Political Forgiveness 2005 Lanham Rowman and Littlefield Publishers

ArendtHannah Condition de l’homme moderne 1961 Paris Calmann-Lévy

AsmalKaderAsmalLouiseRobertsRonald S. Reconciliation Through Truth: Reckoning of Apartheid’s Criminal Governance 1997 Cape town David Philips

BanusiewiczJohn D. “Clinton, Gates Voice support for Afghan Reconciliation” Defense Department Documents and Publications 2010 October 14 2010

BargalDavidSivanEmmanuel Bar-Siman-TovY. “Leadership and Reconciliation” From Conflict Resolution to Reconciliation 2004 Oxford Oxford University Press

Bar-Siman-TovYaacov KacowiczArie M. “Israel-Egypt Peace: Stable Peace?” Stable Peace among Nations 2000 Boulder Rowman and Littlefield Publishers

Bar-Siman-TovYaacov From Conflict Resolution to Reconciliation 2004 Oxford Oxford University Press

Bar-TalDaniel “From Intractable Conflict Through Conflict Resolution to Reconciliation: Psychological Analysis” Political Psychology 2000 21 351 365

BiddleStephenFotiniChristiaThierAlexander “Defining Success in Afghanistan Subtitle: What Can the United States Accept?” Foreign Affairs 2010 89 4 48

BiggarNigel Burying the Past. Making Peace and doing Justice after Civil Conflicts 2003 Washington Georgetown University Press

BrudholmThomas Resentment’s Virtue: Jean Amery and the Refusal to Forgive 2008 Philadelphia Temple University Press

BrudholmThomasRosouxValerie “The Unforgiving. Reflections on the Resistance to Forgiveness after Atrocity” Law and Contemporary Problems 2009 72 101 117

CherryJanet “Just war’ and ‘just means’: Was the TRC wrong about the ANC?” Transformation 2000 42 9 28

CohenRaymond Bar-Siman-TovYaacov “Apology and Reconciliation in International Relations” From Conflict Resolution to Reconciliation 2004 Oxford Oxford University Press

de GaulleCharles Discours et messages 1970 Paris Plon

De GreiffPablo The Handbook of Reparations 2006 Oxford Oxford University Press

DeloriMathias Le travail de mémoire au sein de l’OFAJ (1963–2001) 2002 Final dissertation Institut d’Etudes Politiques de Grenoble.

DuclosNathalie “Incertaine réconciliation au Kosovo” Raisons politiques 2003 9 2 141 159

DwyerSusan “Reconciliation for Realists” Ethics and International Affairs 1999 13 81 98

EdkinsJenny Trauma and the Memory of Politics 2003 Cambridge Cambridge University Press

EvensonElizabeth M. “Truth and Justice in Sierra Leone: Coordination between Commission and The Court” Columbia Law Review 2004 104 3 730 767

FeronElise “Irlande du Nord: la paix en haut, la guerre en bas?” Critique internationale 2002 16 3 24 30

ForsbergTuomas BiggarNigel “The Philosophy and Practice of Dealing with the Past” Burying the Past. Making Peace and doing Justice after Civil Conflicts 2003 Washington Georgetown University Press

GaltungJohan Abu-NimerMohammed “After Violence, Reconstruction, Reconciliation, and Resolution” Reconciliation Justice and Coexistence. Theory and Practice 2001 Lanham Lexington Books

Gardner-FeldmanLily “The Principle and Practice of ‘Reconciliation’ in German Foreign Policy/ Relations with France, Israel, Poland and Czech Republic” International Affairs 2002 75 2 333 356

Gardner-FeldmanLily Germany’s External Reconciliation as a Defining Feature of Foreign Policy: Lessons for Japan? 2006 Available at: http://www.aicgs.org/analysis/c/lgf042806.aspx.

Garton AshTimothy Le GloannecAnne-MarieSmolarAlexander “The Waters of Mesomnesia” Entre Kant et Kosovo. Etudes offertes à Pierre Hassner 2003 Paris Presses de Sciences Po.

GeissPeterLe QuintrecGuillaume Histoire/Geschichte. L’Europe et le monde depuis 1945 2007 Paris Nathan

GibsonJames L. Overcoming Apartheid: Can Truth Reconcile a Divided Nation? 2004 New York Russell Sage Foundation

GovierTrudyVerwoerdWilhelm “Trust and the Problem of National Reconciliation” Philosophy of the Social Science 2002 32 6 178 205

GrosserAlfred French Foreign Policy under de Gaulle 1967 Boston Little Brown

HaynerPriscilla B. Unspeakable Truths: Confronting State Terror and Atrocity 2001 New York Routledge

HazanPierre “Measuring the Impact of Punishment and Forgiveness: a Framework for evaluating Transitional Justice” International Review of the Red Cross 2006 88 861 19 47

HeYinan The Search for Reconciliation: Sino-Japanese and German-Polish Relations since World War II 2009 New York Cambridge University Press

HendersonJenniferWakehamPauline “Colonial Reckoning. National Reconciliation? Aboriginal Peopls and the Culture of Redress in Canada” English Studies in Canada 2009 35 1 1 26

HermannTamar S. Bar-Siman-TovYaacov “Reconciliation: Reflections on the Theoretical and Practical Utility of the Term” From Conflict Resolution to Reconciliation 2004 Oxford Oxford University Press

JospinLionelSchröderGerhard “Memory and Identity” Genshagen 1999 Sept. 24–25

KacowiczArie M.Bar-Siman-TovYaacov KacowiczArie M. “Stable Peace: A Conceptual Framework” Stable Peace among Nations 2000 Lanham Rowman & Littlefield

KelmanHerbert C. Bar-Siman-TovYaacov “Reconciliation as Identity Change: A Social Psychological Perspective” From Conflict Resolution to Reconciliation 2004 Oxford Oxford University Press

KriesbergLouis Bar-Siman-TovYaacov “Comparing Reconciliation Actions within and between Countries” From Conflict Resolution to Reconciliation 2004 Oxford Oxford University Press

KurbjuweitDirk “Let Down by the US: Why Germany Needs Europe” Der Spiegel 2010 December 14 Available at: http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/let-down-by-the-us-why-germany-needs-europe-a-734430.html.

LederachJohn Paul Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies 1997 Washington, D.C. United States Institute of Peace Press

LederachJohn Paul WeinerEugene “Beyond Violence: Building Sustainable Peace” The Handbook of Interethnic Coexistence 1998 New York Continuum

LloydRobert B. ZartmanWilliam “Expecting satisfaction: Negotiating a durable peace in South Africa” Peace versus Justice. Negotiating Forward – and Backward-Looking Outcomes 2005 Lanham Rowman & Littlefield Publishers

LongWilliam JBreckePeter B. War and Reconciliation. Reason and Emotion in Conflict Resolution 2003 Cambridge The MIT Press

MontvilleJoseph SandoleDennisvan der MerveHugo “The Healing Function in Political Conflict Resolution” Conflict Resolution theory and Practice: Integration and Application 1993 Manchester Manchester University Press

MontvilleJoseph “Justice and the Burdens of History” 2001 paper presented at the 24th conference of the International Society of Political Psychology 14–18 July Cuernavaca, Mexico

Mossom StanekzaiMohammad “Thwarting Afghanistan’s Insurgency. A Pragmatic Approach toward Peace and Reconciliation” U.S.I.P. Special Report 2008 212

MujawayoEstherBelhaddadSaouad Survivantes. Rwanda histoire d’un génocide 2004 La Tour-d’Aigues Éditions de l’Aube

MukayirangaSpeciosa CoquioCatherine “Sentiments de rescapés” L’Histoire trouée. Négation et témoignage 2004 Nantes l’Atalante

MurphyJeffrie GHamptonJean Forgiveness and Mercy 1988 Cambridge Cambridge University Press

PBS Newshour “Will ‘Target and Talk’ Approach Work With the Taliban?” 2010 Interview with David Lamm air date: October 15.

PeyrefitteAlain C’était de Gaulle 1994 Paris Fayard

PhilippsAnn “The Politics of Reconciliation Revisited: Germany and East-Central Europe” World Affairs 2001 163 4 171 191

PhilpottDaniel Politics of Past Evil: Religion Reconciliation And the Dilemmas of Transitional Justice 2006 Chicago University of Notre-Dame Press

RosouxValerie Les usages de la mémoire dans les relations internationales 2001 Brussels Bruylant

RosouxValerie “Human rights and the ‘work of memory’ in international relations” International Journal of Human Rights 2004 3 2 159 170

RosouxValerie “La gestion du passe au Rwanda. Ambivalences et poids du silence” Geneses 2005 4 61 28 46

SchappAndrew Political Reconciliation 2005 London Routledge

ShriverDonald W. An Ethic for Enemies: Forgiveness in Politics 1995 New York Oxford University Press

StaubErvin “Genocide and Mass Killing: Origins, Prevention, Healing and Reconciliation” Political Psychology 2000 21 367 362

Truth and Reconciliation Commission Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report 1998 Vol. 2 Johannesburg

TutuDesmund No Future without Forgiveness 1999 New York Doubleday

TutuDesmund “Reconciliation in Post-Apartheid South Africa: Experience of the Truth Commission” The Art of Peace: Nobel Peace Laureates Discuss Human Rights Conflict and Resolution 2000 Ithaca, N.Y. Snow Lion Publications

Van der MerweHugo BiggarNigel “National and Community Reconciliation. Competing Agendas in the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission” Burying the Past. Making Peace and doing Justice after Civil Conflicts 2003 Washington Georgetown University Press

Van NessDaniel “New Wine and Old Wineskins: Four Challenges of Restorative Justice” Criminal Law Forum 1993 4 2 251 276

WilmerFranke “The Social Construction of Conflict Reconciliation in the Former Yugoslavia” Social Justice 1998 25 4 90 113

WilsonRichard A. de BritoAlexandra Barahona “Justice and Legitimacy in South African Transition” The Politics of Memory. Transitional Justice in Democratizing Societies 2001 Oxford Oxford University Press

ZartmanI. William SternPaulDruckmanDaniel “Ripeness: The Hurting Stalemate and Beyond” International Conflict Resolution after the Cold War 2000 Washington, D.C. National Academy Press

ZartmanI. WilliamBermanMaureen The Practical Negotiator 1982 New Haven Yale University Press

ZartmanI. WilliamKremenyukVictor Peace versus Justice: Negotiating Forward – and Backward-Looking Outcomes Lanham Rowman & Littlefield Publishers

4)

Gardner-Feldman (2002) distinguishes philosophical-emotional and practical-material components of reconciliation. In the same line Long and Brecke (2003) analyse two main models of reconciliation: a signalling model and a forgiveness model. Hermann (2004) discerns cognitive emotional-spiritual and procedural aspects of reconciliation. Nadler (2001) puts an emphasis on socio-emotional and instrumental reconciliation. Schaap (2005) emphasizes restorative and political reconciliation approaches. Galtung (2001) refers to no less than twelve different conceptions of reconciliation.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 34 34 24
Full Text Views 10 10 10
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0