Mediation in Territorial, Maritime and River Disputes

in International Negotiation
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

This article seeks to explain factors that make mediation attempts more or less likely in territorial, maritime, and river disputes. I argue that the intensity of the dispute and the salience of disputed territory have strong influence on mediation attempts. The study further examines the impact of these factors on the type of mediation strategy (directive, procedural, or communications). Hypotheses about mediation attempts are tested with the icow data set of interstate territorial, maritime, and river disputes from 1816 to 2001. Findings indicate that intensity of the dispute and salience of disputed territory have a strong impact on the selection of mediation in the first place, and second, that salience of disputed territory makes the directive strategy more likely, while intensity of the dispute makes procedural or communications strategies more likely.

Mediation in Territorial, Maritime and River Disputes

in International Negotiation

Sections

References

AbbottKenneth W.SnidalDuncan “Why States Act Through Formal International Organizations” Journal of Conflict Resolution 1998 42 1 3 32

Act of Montevideo United Nations Treaty Series 1979 vol. 1088 135

BercovitchJacob J. BercovitchJacob J.KremenyukVictorZartmanI. William “Mediation and Conflict Resolution” Sage Handbook on Conflict Resolution 2009 Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Press

BercovitchJacobAnagnosonJ. TheodoreWilleDonnett L. “Some Conceptual Issues and Empirical Trends in the Study of Successful Mediation in International Relations” Journal of Peace Research 1991 28 1 7 17

BercovitchJacob J. BercovitchJacob J.RubinJeffrey Z. “The Structure and Diversity of Mediation in International Relations” Mediation Research: The Process and Effectiveness of Third-Party Intervention 1992 New York St. Martin’s Press

BercovitchJacob J.RubinJeffrey Z. Mediation in International Relations: Multiple Approaches to Conflict Management 1992 New York St. Martin’s Press

BercovitchJacob J.LangleyJ.P. “The Nature of the Dispute and the Effectiveness of International Mediation” Journal of Conflict Resolution 1993 34 4 670 691

BercovitchJacob J.WellsR. “Evaluating Mediation Strategies: Theoretical and Empirical Analysis” Peace and Change 1993 18 3 25

BercovitchJacob J.ReganPatrick M. “The Structure of International Conflict Management: An Analysis of the Effects on Intractability and Mediation” International Journal of Peace Studies 1999 4 1

BercovitchJacob J.HoustonAllison “Why Do They Do It Like This? An Analysis of the Factors Influencing Mediation Behavior in International Conflicts” Journal of Conflict Resolution 2000 44 2 170 202

BercovitchJacob J.SchneiderGerald “Who Mediates? The Political Economy of International Conflict Management” Journal of Peace Research 2000 37 2 145 165

BercovitchJacob J.GartnerScott S. “Is There Method in the Madness of Mediation? Some Lessons for Mediators from Quantitative Studies of Mediation” International Interactions 2006 34 2 329 354

FrazierDerrick V. “Third Party Characteristics, Territory and the Mediation of Militarized Interstate Disputes” Conflict Management and Peace Science 2006 23 4 267 284

GartnerScott Sigmund “The Influence of Directive Strategies on Settlement Duration” International Negotiation: A Journal of Theory and Practice 2014 19 2

GentStephenShannonMegan “Decision Control and the pursuit of binding conflict management: Choosing the ties that bind” Journal of Conflict Resolution 2011 55 5 710 734

GriegJ. Michael “Moments of Opportunity: Recognizing Conditions for Ripeness for International Mediation between Enduring Rivals” Journal of Conflict Resolution 2001 45 6 691 718

GriegJ. Michael “Stepping Into the Fray: When Do Mediators Mediate?” American Journal of Political Science 2005 49 2 249 266

GriegJ. MichaelDiehlPaul F. International Mediation 2012 Cambridge MA: Polity

GriegJ. MichaelMeernikJames D. “To Prosecute or Not to Prosecute: Civil War Mediation and the International Criminal Court” International Negotiation: A Journal of Theory and Practice 2014 19 2

HansenHolleyMitchellSara McLaughlinNemethStephen C “IO Mediation of Interstate Conflicts: Moving Beyond the Global vs. Regional Dichotomy” Journal of Conflict Resolution 2008 52 2 295 325

HenselPaul R “Contentious Issues and World Politics: The Management of Territorial Claims in the Americas, 1816–1992” International Studies Quarterly 2001 45 1 81 109

HenselPaul RMitchellSara McLaughlin “Issue Indivisibility and Territorial Claims” GeoJournal 2005 64 4 275 285

HenselPaul RMitchellSara McLaughlinSowersThomas E.IIThyneClayton L. “Bones of Contention: Comparing Territorial, Maritime and River Issues” Journal of Conflict Resolution 2008 52 1 117 143

HenselPaul RTuresJohn “International Law and the Settlement of Territorial Claims in South America, 1816–1992” 1997 Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association September 1997 Washington, D.C.

HuthPaul K. Standing Your Ground: Territorial Disputes and International Conflict 1996 Ann Arbor, MI The University of Michigan Press

HuthPaul K.AlleeTodd L. The Democratic Peace and Territorial Conflict in the Twentieth Century 2002 Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press

JamesPatrickParkJohannChoiSeung-Whan “Democracy and Conflict Management: Territorial Claims in the Western Hemisphere Revisited” International Studies Quarterly 2006 50 4 803 817

KratochwilFriedrich Peace and Disputed Territory 1985 Lanham, MD University Press of America

MitchellSara McLaughlin “A Kantian System? Democracy and Third Party Conflict Resolution” American Journal of Political Science 2002 46 4 749 759

MitchellSara McLaughlinKaderaKelly M.CrescenziMark J.C. BercovitchJacobGartnerScott Sigmund “Practicing Democratic Community Norms: Third Party Conflict Management and Successful Settlements” International Conflict Mediation: New Approaches and Findings 2008 New York, NY Routledge

OwsiakAndrewFrazierDerrick V. “The Conflict Management Efforts of Allies in Interstate Disputes” Foreign Policy Analysis 2014 forthcoming

PowellEmilia JustynaWiegandKrista E. “Strategic Selection: Political and Legal Mechanisms of Territorial Dispute Resolution” Journal of Peace Research 2014 51 3

ReganPatrickStamAllen C. “In the Nick of Time: Conflict Management, Mediation Timing, and the Duration of Interstate Disputes” International Studies Quarterly 2000 44 2 239 260

RubinJeffrey Z. “Experimental Research on Third-Party Intervention in Conflict” Psychological Bulletin 1980 87 379 391

ShannonMegan “Preventing War and Providing the Peace? International Organizations and the Management of Territorial Disputes” Conflict Management and Peace Science 2009 26 2 144 163

TirJaroslav Redrawing the Map to Promote Peace: Territorial Dispute Management via Territorial Changes 2006 Lanham, MD Lexington Books

WiegandKrista E. Enduring Territorial Disputes: Strategies of Bargaining Coercive Diplomacy and Settlement 2011 Athens, GA The University of Georgia Press

WiegandKrista E.PowellEmilia Justyna “Past Experience, Quest for the Best Forum, and Peaceful Attempts to Resolve Territorial Disputes” Journal of Conflict Resolution 2011 55 1 33 59

WilkenfeldJonathanYoungKathleenAsalVictorQuinnDavid “Mediating International Crises: Cross National and Experimental Perspectives” Journal of Conflict Resolution 2003 47 3 279 301

ZartmanI. William SternPaul C.DruckmanDaniel “Ripeness: The Hurting Stalemate and Beyond” International Conflict Resolution After the Cold War 2000 Washington, DC National Academy Press

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 35 35 21
Full Text Views 7 7 7
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0