Modern empirical social science is unique in denying, dismissing, or discounting the role of justice considerations in human behavior. A relatively small group of International Relations (ir) scholars have attempted to address this lacuna, with limited uptake to date. The articles in this issue collectively seek to move this research program forward. In this essay, I explore various conceptual, epistemological, methodological, and sociology-of-the-field issues that may be responsible for its limited traction thus far and argue that only the last represents a serious obstacle. Whether recent trends and developments in ir indicate that the time may finally be ripe for a robust normal science on the role of justice considerations in international politics remains to be seen, but negotiation theorists are in the best position to move it forward.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Albin Cecilia “When the Weak Confront the Strong: Justice, Fairness, and Power in the Israel-PLO Interim Talks.” International Negotiation 1999 4 2 327 367
Albin Cecilia “Negotiating International Cooperation: Global Public Goods and Fairness.” Review of International Studies 2003 29 3 365 385
Albin Cecilia “Negotiating International Cooperation: Global Public Goods and Fairness.” Peace Research Abstracts 2005 42 1 236625
Albin Cecilia “Using Negotiation to Promote Legitimacy: An Assessment of Proposals for Reforming the WTO.” International Affairs 2008 84 4 757 775
Albin Cecilia & Druckman Daniel “Equality Matters: Negotiating an End to Civil Wars.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 2012 56 2 155 182
Brownlie Ian “The Peaceful Settlement of International Disputes.” Chinese Journal of International Law 2009 8 2 267 283
Castelli Ilaria, Massaro Davide, Sanfey Alan G. & Marchetti Antonella “‘What Is Fair for You?’ Judgments and Decisions about Fairness and Theory of Mind.” European Journal of Developmental Psychology 2014 11 1 49 62
Ciplet David, Roberts J. Timmons & Khan Mizan “The Politics of International Climate Adaptation Funding: Justice and Divisions in the Greenhouse.” Global Environmental Politics 2013 13 1 49 68
Crawford Neta C. “The Passion of World Politics: Propositions on Emotion and Emotional Relationships.” International Security 2000 24 4 116 156
Derman Brandon B. “Climate Governance, Justice, and Transnational Civil Society.” Climate Policy 2014 14 1 23 41
Druckman Daniel & Albin Cecilia “Distributive Justice and the Durability of Peace Agreements.” Review of International Studies 2011 37 3 1137 1168
Fiske Shelley T. “Schema-Based Versus Piecemeal Politics: A Patchwork Quilt, but Not a Blanket, of Evidence.” Political Cognition 1986 41 53
Franceschet A. “Justice and International Organization: Two Models of Global Governance.” Global Governance 2002 8 1 19 34
George Alexander L. & Bennett Andrew Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences 2005 Cambridge, MA MIT Press
Goertz Gary & Mahoney James A Tale of Two Cultures: Qualitative and Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences 2012 Princeton, NJ Princeton University Press
Haig Alexander M. Jr. Caveat: Realism, Reagan, and Foreign Policy 1984 New York Macmillan
Harris Paul G. & Symons Jonathan “Norm Conflict in Climate Governance: Greenhouse Gas Accounting and the Problem of Consumption.” Global Environmental Politics 2013 13 1 9 29
Hollis Martin & Smith Steve Explaining and Understanding International Relations 1991 Oxford Clarendon Press
King Gary, Keohane Robert O. & Verba Sidney Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research 1994 Princeton, NJ Princeton University Press
Kuhn Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 1970 2nd ed. Chicago University of Chicago Press
Kurki Milja “Causes of a Divided Discipline: Rethinking the Concept of Cause in International Relations Theory.” Review of International Studies 2006 32 2 189 216
Lapid Yosef “The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post-Positivist Era.” International Studies Quarterly 1989 33 3 235 254
Lebow Richard Ned The Tragic Vision of Politics: Ethics, Interests and Orders 2003 Cambridge Cambridge University Press
Lerner Melvin J. “The Justice Motive in Social Behavior: Introduction.” Journal of Social Issues 1975 31 3 1 19
Lerner Melvin J. & Lerner Sally C. The Justice Motive in Social Behavior: Adapting to Times of Scarcity and Change 1981 New York Plenum Press
Levy Jack S. & Vakili Lily I. Midlarsky Manus I. “Diversionary Action by Authoritarian Regimes: Argentina in the Falklands/Malvinas Case,” The Internationalization of Communal Strife 1992 London Routledge 118 146
Morgenthau Hans J. Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace 1948 New York Knopf
Morgenthau Hans J. “The Mainsprings of American Foreign Policy: The National Interest vs. Moral Abstractions.” American Political Science Review 1950 44 4 833 854
Morgenthau Hans J. Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace 1978 5th ed. New York Knopf
Powell Emilia Justyna & Wiegand Krista E. “Legal Systems and Peaceful Attempts to Resolve Territorial Disputes.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 2010 27 2 129 151
Redlick Fritz Hitler: Diagnosis of a Destructive Prophet 1999 New York Oxford University Press
Reis Harry T. Masters John C. & Smith William P. “The Nature of the Justice Motive: Some Thoughts on Operation, Internalization, and Justification,” Social Comparison, Social Justice, and Relative Deprivation: Theoretical, Empirical, and Policy Perspectives 1987 Hillsdale, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 131 150
Sinden Amy “Allocating the Costs of the Climate Crisis: Efficiency Versus Justice.” Washington Law Review 2010 85 2 293 353
Smart Nick Neville Chamberlain 2010 London Routledge
Stalley Phillip “Principled Strategy: The Role of Equity Norms in China’s Climate Change Diplomacy.” Global Environmental Politics 2013 13 1 1 8
Ubeda Paloma “The Consistency of Fairness Rules: An Experimental Study.” Journal of Economic Psychology 2014 41 88 100
Waltz Kenneth N. Theory of International Politics 1979 New York Random House
Welch David A. Justice and the Genesis of War 1993a Cambridge Cambridge University Press
Welch David A. Stein Janice Gross & Pauly Louis W. “The Politics and Psychology of Restraint: Israeli Decision-Making in the Gulf War,” Choosing to Co-Operate: How States Avoid Loss 1993b Baltimore, MD Johns Hopkins University Press 128 169
Welch David A. “Remember the Falklands? Missed Lessons of a Misunderstood War.” International Journal 1997 52 3 483 507
Welch David A. Renshon Stanley A. & Larson Deborah W. “Culture and Emotion as Obstacles to Good Judgment: The Case of Argentina’s Invasion of the Falklands/Malvinas,” Good Judgment in Foreign Policy: Theory and Application 2003a Lanham, MD Rowman & Littlefield 191 215
Welch David A. “Why International Relations Theorists Should Stop Reading Thucydides.” Review of International Studies 2003b 29 3 301 319
Welch David A. Painful Choices: A Theory of Foreign Policy Change 2005 Princeton, NJ Princeton University Press
Welch David A. Orwin Donna Tussing & McPeak Rick “Tolstoy the International Relations Theorist,” War and Peace across Disciplines 2012 Ithaca, NY Cornell University Press 175 189
Wendt Alexander Guzzini Stefano & Leander Anna “Social Theory as Cartesian Science: An Auto-Critique from a Quantum Perspective,” Constructivism and International Relations: Alexander Wendt and His Critics 2006 London Routledge 178 216
Whitehead Dennis “The Gleiwitz Incident.” After the Battle 2009 142 2 23
Zartman I. William “The Role of Justice in Global Security Negotiations.” American Behavioral Scientist 1995 38 6 889 903
Zartman I. William & Berman Maureen R. The Practical Negotiator 1982 New Haven Yale University Press
Zeitoun Mark “Global Environmental Justice and International Transboundary Waters: An Initial Exploration.” Geographical Journal 2013 179 2 141 149
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 626 | 149 | 7 |
Full Text Views | 236 | 2 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 97 | 9 | 0 |
Modern empirical social science is unique in denying, dismissing, or discounting the role of justice considerations in human behavior. A relatively small group of International Relations (ir) scholars have attempted to address this lacuna, with limited uptake to date. The articles in this issue collectively seek to move this research program forward. In this essay, I explore various conceptual, epistemological, methodological, and sociology-of-the-field issues that may be responsible for its limited traction thus far and argue that only the last represents a serious obstacle. Whether recent trends and developments in ir indicate that the time may finally be ripe for a robust normal science on the role of justice considerations in international politics remains to be seen, but negotiation theorists are in the best position to move it forward.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 626 | 149 | 7 |
Full Text Views | 236 | 2 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 97 | 9 | 0 |