Trying Again: Power-Sharing in Post-Civil War Lebanon

in International Negotiation
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

The paper situates Lebanon in the context of consociationalist theorizing about politics in deeply divided societies. It suggests that none of the four prevailing models of Middle Eastern political systems (liberalism, patrimonial, nationalist-authoritarian, and corporatist) explicitly addresses vertical solidarist formations. Consociationalism attempts to do so, but Lebanon's experience with it has yielded negative as well as positive results. The paper reviews the contradictions of Lebanon's recent history, examining first ``the golden age'' and then the era of the civil war and the ``militia republic'' (1975–1990). It then analyzes the ``Ta'if Accord'' which provided the basis for a post-civil war reconstruction, and while it notes some institutional improvements (hence the designation of the agreement as ``consociationalism-plus'') it expresses skepticism whether the provisions in Ta'if that call for the gradual elimination of political confessionalism will be implemented. The paper draws attention to the presence of external players on the Lebanese scene, especially Israel and Syria, and discusses the two post-civil war parliamentary elections in 1992 and 1996. It concludes that Lebanon's political recovery has been only partly successful.

Trying Again: Power-Sharing in Post-Civil War Lebanon

in International Negotiation

Sections

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 62 62 29
Full Text Views 87 87 61
PDF Downloads 23 23 15
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0