The present study challenges three common assumptions of the international mediation literature. First, it challenges the perception that pure or weak mediators are unable to use manipulative and coercive strategies in the mediation process, but can only resort to facilitating the dialogue and at most formulating a proposal on behalf of the disputants. Secondly, it challenges the perception that only resource-based power can be used to manipulate the process and coerce (and direct) the parties toward mutually acceptable solutions. This misconception is based on the assumption that the expansion of the zone of possible agreement, which is mainly attributed to manipulative strategies, can be achieved only by the employment of carrots and sticks which are often inaccessible to pure or weak mediators. Lastly, it shows how this type of leverage can also indicate a particular bias that an apparent pure mediator might have: bias of outcome.
BercovitchJacobCrockerChester A.HampsonFen OslerAallPamela“Mediation in the Most Resistant Cases,”Grasping the Nettle: Analyzing Cases of Intractable Conflict2005Washington D.C.U.S. Institute of Pease Press
FretterJudithBercovitchJacob“International Organizations and Conflict Management: The United Nations and the Mediation of International Conflicts,”Studies in International Mediation2002New YorkPalgrave MacMillan
HopmannTerrance P.CrockerChester A.HampsonFen OslerAallPamela“Bargaining and Problem Solving: Two Perspectives on International Negotiation,”Turbulent Peace: The Challenge of Managing International Conflict2001Washington D.C.U.S. Institute of Peace Press
TouvalSaadiaCrockerChester A.HampsonFen OslerAallPamela“International Mediation in the Post-Cold War Era,”Turbulent Peace: The Challenges of Managing International Conflict2006Washington, D.C.United States Institute of Peace Press
Venice CommissionOpinion on the compatibility of the existing legislation in Montenegro concerning the organization of referendum with applicable international standards2005Accessed on June 15, 2015Strasbourg
ZartmanI. WilliamCrockerChester A.HampsonFen OslerAallPamela R.“International Mediation in the Post-Cold War Era,”Managing Global Chaos: Sources of and Responses to International Conflict1996Washington, D.C.United States Institute of Peace Press