Emerging Powers, Domestic Politics, and wto Dispute Settlement Reform

in International Negotiation
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

As the wto’s Dispute Settlement Body (dsb) gains relevance as a rule-maker in trade governance, understanding the reform negotiations addressing its legal framework becomes increasingly important. This article examines how domestic ideas and interests affect the reform positions of two of the dsb’s most active users, emerging power states Brazil and India. Regarding domestic interests, I draw on the domestic politics and two-level games literatures to argue that the amount and favorability of domestic sectors’ experience with the dsb affects their incentives to lobby during the reform negotiations. Interestingly, this results in countries pursuing liberal interests within negotiations, despite having conflicting domestic interest preferences overall. Regarding domestic ideas, I find evidence that Brazilian and Indian politicians feel accountable to voters in the negotiations, contradicting claims to the contrary in the literature. This highlights the need for more research illustrating links between voters and officials in this context.

Emerging Powers, Domestic Politics, and wto Dispute Settlement Reform

in International Negotiation

Sections

References

AgiusMaria F. “Strategies and Success in Litigation and Negotiation in the wto.” International Negotiation 2012 17 1 139 162

AmorimCelso Luiz Nunes 2005 Statement at the Union Ministerial Conference on WTO Negotiations Itamaraty

ArnoldJens MatthiasJavorcikBeataLipscombMollyMattooAaditya “Services Reform and Manufacturing Performance: Evidence from India.” The Economic Journal 2016 126 590 1 39

BartelsLorand “Making wto Dispute Settlement Work for African Countries: An Evaluation of Current Proposals for Reforming the dsu.” The Law and Development Review 2013 6 2 47 66

bbc bbc World Service Poll 2010 April 18 accessed February 21 2016 At http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/170610_bbcpoll.pdf

BesleyTimothyBurgessRobin “The Political Economy of Government Responsiveness: Theory and Evidence from India.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 2002 117 4 1415 1451

BurgesSean W. “Brazil as a Bridge Between Old and New Powers?” International Affairs 2013 89 3 577 594

BuschMarc L. Overlapping Institutions and Global Commerce: Forum Shopping for Dispute Settlement in International Trade 2005 American Political Science Association Annual Meeting Washington, D.C.

BuschMarc L.ReinhardtEricShafferGregory “Does Legal Capacity Matter? Explaining Patterns of Protectionism in the Shadow of wto Litigation.” Issue Paper International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development Geneva Switzerland 2008 accessed February 21 2016 At http://ssrn.com/abstract=1091435

C-Voter Team Survey conducted for author via the csr Initiative Team C-Voter 2010

CapdevilaGustavo wto Rules against Canada in Dispute with Brazil Inter Press Service 2002 accessed February 21 2016 At http://www.ipsnews.net/2002/02/trade-wto-rules-against-canada-in-dispute-with-brazil/

ccga Global Views 2006: India Public Topline Report Chicago Council on Global Affairs 2006

cia “The World Factbook.” 2015 accessed November 16 2015 At https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/

cii Indian Industry Suggestions for Negotiating Free Trade Agreements 2006 November New Delhi Confederation of Indian Industry

CortellAndrew P.DavisJames W.Jr. “How Do International Institutions Matter? The Domestic Impact of International Rules and Norms.” International Studies Quarterly 1996 40 4 451 478

CrossKaren Halverson “King Cotton, Developing Countries and the ‘Peace Clause’: The WTO’s US Cotton Subsidies Decision.” Journal of International Economic Law 2006 9 1 149 195

da Conceição-HeldtEugénia “Emerging Powers in WTO Negotiations: The Domestic Sources of Trade Policy Preferences.” International Trade Journal 2013 27 5 431 449

Datafolha Utopia do brasileiro Opinião Pública 2000 accessed February 21 2016 São Paulo Datafolha Instituto de Pesquisas At http://datafolha.folha.uol.com.br/opiniaopublica/2000/04/1223886-utopia-do-brasileiro.shtml

DaveyWilliam J. “The WTO Dispute Settlement System: The First Ten Years.” Journal of International Economic Law 2005 8 1 17 50

DaveyWilliam J. “The WTO and Rules-Based Dispute Settlement: Historical Evolution, Operational Success, and Future Challenges.” Journal of International Economic Law 2014 17 679 700

DavisChristina L.BermeoSarah Blodgett “Who Files? Developing Country Participation in GATT/WTO Adjudication.” The Journal of Politics 2009 71 3 1033 1049

de BièvreDirkPolettiArlo “Judicial Politics in International Trade Relations: Introduction to the Special Issue.” World Trade Review 2015 14 S1 S11

DoC Statement by the Honourable Murasoli Maran 2001 accessed February 21 2016 Ministerial Conference, Fourth Session D.o.C. (India) At https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/minist_e/min01_e/statements_e/st10.pdf

DoctorMahrukh “Brazil’s Role in Institutions of Global Economic Governance: The WTO and G20.” Global Society 2015 29 3 286 300

EberhardtPiaKumarDharmendra Trade Invaders. How Big Business is Driving the EU-India Free Trade Negotiations 2010 Brussels Corporate Europe Observatory 43

FattoreChristina “The Influence of Legal Capacity on WTO Dispute Duration.” The International Trade Journal 2013 27 5 450 464

GilboyGeorge J.HeginbothamEric “Double Trouble: A Realist View of Chinese and Indian Power” The Washington Quarterly 2013 36 3 125 142

GlobeScan 20 Nation Poll Finds Strong Global Consensus: Support for Free Market System, But Also More Regulation of Large Companies 2006 accessed February 21 2016 At http://www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/pdf/jan06/FreeMarkets_Jan06_quaire.pdf

GrossmanGene M.HelpmanElhanan “Protection for Sale” The American Economic Review 1994 84 4 833 850

HillmanArye L. “Declining Industries and Political-Support Protectionist Moves” American Economic Review 1982 72 5 1180 1187

HillmanJennifer Saving Multilateralism: Renovating the House of Global Economic Governance for the 21st Century Brussels Forum Paper Series 2010 Washington, D.C. German Marshall Fund

HoekmanBernardMartinWillMattooAaditya “Conclude Doha: It Matters!” World Trade Review 2010 9 3 505 530

HopewellKristen “New Protagonists in Global Economic Governance: Brazilian Agribusiness at the WTO” New Political Economy 2013 18 4 603 623

HurrellAndrewNarlikarAmrita “A New Politics of Confrontation? Brazil and India in Multilateral Trade Negotiations” Global Society 2006 20 4 415 433

JaishankarDhruva Interview with author 2011 German Marshall Fund of the United States Washington D.C.

KaleSunila “The Political Economy of India’s Second-Generation Reforms” Journal of Strategic Studies 2002 25 4 207 225

KaleSunila “Inside Out: India’s Global Reorientation” India Review 2009 8 1 43 62

KennedyMatthew “China’s Role in WTO Dispute Settlement” World Trade Review 2012 11 4 555 589

KhemaniStuti “Political Cycles in a Developing Economy: Effect of Elections in the Indian States” Journal of Development Economics 2004 73 1 125 154

KrishnaPravin Interview with author 2011 Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies Washington D.C.

LiljaJannie “Domestic-Level Factors and Negotiation (In)Flexibility in the WTO” International Negotiation 2012 17 1 115 138

Lins da SilvaCarlos Eduardo MarconiniM. “Relatório: Relações Bilaterais com os EUA, Argentina, Países Intermediários e outros,” A Política: Externa Brasileira em Perspectiva: Segurança Comércio e Relações Bilaterais 2006 São Paulo LEX Editora

MahrenbachLaura Carsten The Trade Policy of Emerging Powers: Strategic Choices of Brazil and India 2013 Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan

MancusoWagner PralonJorge de OliveiraAmânciio “Abertura Econômica, empresariado e Política: Os Planos domestic e internacional” Lua Nova 2006 69 147 172

ManjiaoChi “China’s Participation in WTO Dispute Settlement over the Past Decade: Experiences and Impacts” Journal of International Economic Law 2012 15 1 29 49

Martinez-DiazLeonardoBrainardLael BrainardL.Martinez-DiazL. “Brazil: The ‘B’ Belongs in the BRICs,” Brazil as an Economic Superpower?: Understanding Brazil’s Changing Role in the Global Economy 2009 Washington D.C. Brookings Institution Press

MilnerHelen V. “The Political Economy of International Trade” Annual Review of Political Science 1999 2 91 114

MoJongryn “The Logic of Two-Level Games with Endogenous Domestic Coalitions” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 1994 38 3 402 422

MoravcsikAndrew “Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics” International Organizations 1997 51 4 513 553

MoreiraMauricio Mesquita BrainardL.Martinez-DiazL. “Brazil’s Trade Policy: Old and New Issues,” Brazil as an Economic Superpower?: Understanding Brazil’s Changing Role in the Global Economy 2009 Washington D.C. Brookings Institution Press

NarlikarAmrita New Powers: How to Become One and How to Manage Them 2010 London Hurst & Company

OsavaMario Cotton Ruling Strengthens the G20 Inter Press Service 2004 accessed February 21 2016 At http://www.ipsnews.net/2004/04/trade-brazil-cotton-ruling-strengthens-the-g20/

Permanent Mission of India Negotiations on the Dispute Settlement Understanding, World Trade Organization 2002 TN/DS/W/18

Pew Pew Global Attitudes Project 44-Nation Major Survey (2002): Final Topline Pew Global Attitudes Project 2003a accessed February 21 2016 Pew Research Center At http://www.pewglobal.org/2003/06/03/views-of-a-changing-world-2003/

Pew Views of a Changing World Pew Global Attitudes Project 2003b accessed February 21 2016 Pew Research Institution At http://www.pewglobal.org/2003/06/03/views-of-a-changing-world-2003/

Pew Brazilians Upbeat about Their Country, Despite Its Problems Pew Global Attitudes Project 2010 accessed February 21 2016 Pew Research Center At http://www.pewglobal.org/2010/09/22/brazilians-upbeat-about-their-country-despite-its-problems/

Pew Pervasive Gloom about the World Economy Pew Global Attitudes Project 2012 accessed February 21 2016 Pew Research Center At http://www.pewglobal.org/2012/07/12/pervasive-gloom-about-the-world-economy/

Press Trust of India India-us Disputes: wto Forms Panels to Resolve Issues 2013

PutnamRobert D. “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games” International Organization 1988 42 3 427 460

RiosSandra MarconiniM. “Relatório: Comércio e Integração,” A Política: Externa Brasileira em Perspectiva: Segurança Comércio e Relações Bilaterais 2006 São Paulo LEX Editora

RiosSandra mercosur: Dilemas [sic] and Alternatives for the Trade Agenda INTAL-ITD Working Paper 2004 Institute for the Integration of Latin America and the Caribbean. SITI-06c

RiosSandra Interview with author Centro de Estudos de Integração e Desenvolvimento Rio de Janeiro 2010

RoettRiordan The New Brazil 2010 Washington, D.C. Brookings Institution Press

RoettRiordan Interview with author 2011 Washington, D.C. Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies

RogowskiRonald “Political Cleavages and Changing Exposure to Trade” The American Political Science Review 1987 81 4 1121 1137

RuddyBrendan “The Critical Success of the WTO: Trade Policies of the Current Economic Crisis” Journal of International Economic Law 2010 13 2 475 495

Saborío SotoRonald Report by the Chairman, Ambassador Ronald Saborío Soto 2015 Geneva World Trade Organization. TN/DS/27

SallyRazeen Indian Trade Policy after the Crisis Brussels European Centre for International Political Economy 2011 accessed February 21 2016 At http://www.ecipe.org/app/uploads/2014/12/indian-trade-policy-after-the-crisis.pdf

SchirmStefan A. “Ideas and Interests in Global Financial Governance: Comparing German and US Preference Formation” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 2009 22 3 501 521

SennesRicardo Ubiraci Interview with author 2010 Prospectiva Consultoria São Paulo Brazil

ShafferGregory C. “The Challenges of WTO Law: Strategies for Developing Country Adaptation” World Trade Review 2006 5 2 177 198

ShafferGregory C.Ratton SanchezMichelleRosenbergBarbara “The Trials of Winning at the WTO: What Lies Behind Brazil’s Success” Cornell International Law Journal 2008 41 2 381 501

SinhaAseema “Global Linkages and Domestic Politics: Trade Reform and Institution Building in India in Comparative Perspective” Comparative Political Studies 2007 40 10 1183 1210

TrachtmanJoel P. “International Law and Domestic Political Coalitions: The Grand Theory of Compliance with International Law.” 2010 accessed December 12 2014 At http://works.bepress.com/joel_trachtman/1

VarshneyAshutosh “India’s Democratic Challenge” Foreign Affairs 2007 86 2 93 106

VeigaPedro da Motta BrainardL.Martinez-DiazL. “Brazil’s Trade Policy: Moving Away from Old Paradigms?,” Brazil as an Economic Superpower?: Understanding Brazil’s Changing Role in the Global Economy 2009 Washington, D.C. Brookings Institution Press

VickersBrendan NarlikarA.DauntonM.SternR.M. “The Role of the BRICS in the WTO: System-Supporters or Change Agents in Multilateral Trade?,” The Oxford Handbook on the World Trade Organization 2012 Oxford Oxford University Press

wto Minutes of Meeting: 10 September 2002, Centre William Rappard Geneva, World Trade Organization 2002 TN/DS/M/4

wto Minutes of Meeting: 14 October 2002, Centre William Rappard 2003a Geneva World Trade Organization. TN/DS/M/5

wto Minutes of Meeting: 16-18 December 2002, Centre William Rappard 2003b Geneva World Trade Organization. TN/DS/M/7

wto Trade Policy Review – Brazil: Report by the Secretariat 2004 Geneva World Trade Organization. WT/TPR/S/140

wto Minutes of Meeting: 24–25 April 2006, Centre William Rappard 2006 Geneva World Trade Organization. TN/DS/M/32

wto Trade Policy Review – Brazil: Report by the Secretariat – Revision, World Trade Organization 2009 WT/TPR/S/212/Rev.1

wto Trade Policy Review Report by the Secretariat – India, World Trade Organization 2011 WT/TPR/S/249/Rev.1

wto Trade Policy Review – Brazil: Report by the Secretariat – Revision, World Trade Organization 2013 WT/TPR/S/283/Rev.1

wto Trade Policy Review Report by the Secretariat – India 2015 Geneva World Trade Organization. WT/TPR/S/313

ZahrntValentin “Domestic Constituents and the Formulation of WTO Negotiating Positions: What the Delegates Say” World Trade Review 2008 7 2 393 421

ZimmermannThomas A. “WTO Dispute Settlement at Ten: Evolution, Experiences, and Evaluation” Aussenwirtschaft – The Swiss Review of International Economic Relations 2005 60 I 27 61

9

Three and a half years; see Fattore 2013.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 14 14 13
Full Text Views 22 22 22
PDF Downloads 5 5 5
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0