Save

The ‘Power of Process:’ How Negotiation Management Influences Multilateral Cooperation

In: International Negotiation
Author:
Kai Monheim London School of Economics and Political Science Houghton St, London WC2A 2AE United Kingdom K.Monheim@lse.ac.uk

Search for other papers by Kai Monheim in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Management of a multilateral negotiation has frequently played a crucial role in developing global regimes but is often ignored in International Relations theory. The long-awaited un climate summit in Copenhagen, for example, broke down in 2009 but negotiations reached agreement one year later in Cancún. This article argues that power and interests remained largely constant between Copenhagen and Cancún, and that significantly altered negotiation management by the host government and the un explains much of the difference. An analytical framework is presented to address whether and how the management of a multilateral negotiation by the organizers increases or decreases the probability of agreement. The empirical focus is on the Danish and Mexican Presidencies of climate negotiations, with extensive evidence from participant observation and 55 interviews with senior negotiators, high-level un officials, and lead organizers. The argument adds to the scholarship on regime development by complementing structural with process analysis.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1121 197 21
Full Text Views 454 78 17
PDF Views & Downloads 468 154 37