Save

Reforming the United Nations Security Council: Feasibility or Utopia?

In: International Negotiation
Author:
Kai Schaefer 70 Rue Davis, J0T 2V0, Montcalm, Quebec Canada kaischaefer89@gmail.com

Search for other papers by Kai Schaefer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Reforming the United Nations Security Council has been on the agenda of the General Assembly for over two decades. However, structural reform of the Council remains elusive. This article explains why after so many years nearly all 193 states within the un remain actively seized on the matter of reform, despite no immediate outcome being in sight. In order to analyze Security Council reform efforts and the various obstacles along the way, this article emphasizes states’ motivations during the reform process. With the help of new institutionalist theory, an argument is formed that highlights how certain states are driven by strategic calculations and self-interest, while others are more normatively motivated. Furthermore, the article highlights that despite only lukewarm support for reform from certain states, not a single state can publicly denounce Council reform, because the reform issue itself has become an ingrained norm.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 3121 430 46
Full Text Views 782 89 17
PDF Views & Downloads 1090 180 42